Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:04:26.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Elution efficiency of healthcare pathogens from environmental sampling tools

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2019

Rolieria M. West-Deadwyler*
Affiliation:
Clinical and Environmental Microbiology Branch, Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Heather A. Moulton-Meissner
Affiliation:
Clinical and Environmental Microbiology Branch, Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Laura J. Rose
Affiliation:
Clinical and Environmental Microbiology Branch, Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Judith A. Noble-Wang
Affiliation:
Clinical and Environmental Microbiology Branch, Division of Healthcare Quality and Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Author for correspondence: Rolieria M. West-Deadwyler, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, MS H17-4, Atlanta, GA 30329. E-mail: wgr2@cdc.gov

Abstract

Standardizing healthcare surface sampling requires the evaluation of sampling tools for organism adherence. Here, 7 sampling tools were evaluated to assess their elution efficiencies in the presence of 5 pathogens. Foam sponges (80.6%), microfiber wipes (80.5%), foam swabs (77.9%), and cellulose sponges (66.5%) yielded the highest median elution efficiencies.

Type
Concise Communication
Copyright
© 2019 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dancer, SJ.The role of environmental cleaning in the control of hospital-acquired infection. Am J Infect Control 2009;73:378385.Google ScholarPubMed
Weinstein, RA, Hota, B. Contamination, disinfection, and cross-colonization: are hospital surfaces reservoirs for nosocomial infection? Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;39:11821189.Google Scholar
Shams, AM, Rose, LJ, Edwards, JR, et al. Assessment of the overall and multidrug-resistant organism bioburden on environmental surfaces in healthcare facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:14261432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, G, Griffith, C.Problems associated with traditional hygiene swabbing: the need for in‐house standardization. J Appl Microbiol 2007;103:10901103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasan, JA, Japal, KM, Christensen, ER, Samalot-Freire, LC.In vitro production of Clostridium difficile spores for use in the efficacy evaluation of disinfectants: a precollaborative investigation. J AOAC Int 2011;94:259272.Google ScholarPubMed
Da Silva, SM, Filliben, JJ, Morrow, JB.Parameters affecting spore recovery from wipes used in biological surface sampling. J Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:23742380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Merode, AE, van der Mei, HC, Busscher, HJ, Krom, BP.Influence of culture heterogeneity in cell surface charge on adhesion and biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 2006;188:24212426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katsikogianni, M, Missirlis, YF.Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria–material interactions. Eur Cell Mater 2004;8:3757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sehulster, L, Rose, LJ, Noble-Wang, J.Microbiological sampling of the environment in healthcare facilities. In: Mayall, CG ed, Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012:10591076.Google Scholar
Rose, LJ, Hodges, L, O’Connell, H, Noble-Wang, J.National validation study of a cellulose sponge wipe-processing method for use after sampling Bacillus anthracis spores from surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011;77:83558359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

West-Deadwyler et al. supplementary material

West-Deadwyler et al. supplementary material

Download West-Deadwyler et al. supplementary material(File)
File 21.4 KB