Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:31:40.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Wipes for the Prevention of Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Colonization and Hospital-Acquired Infections in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Randomized Trial in Thailand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2015

Adhiratha Boonyasiri*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Peerapat Thaisiam
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Chairat Permpikul
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Tepnimitr Judaeng
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Bordeesuda Suiwongsa
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Napaporn Apiradeewajeset
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Teerawan Fakthongphan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Sunun Suddee
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Wandee Laoagtipparos
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Visanu Thamlikitkul
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
*
Address correspondence to Adhiratha Boonyasiri, MD, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University Bangkok, 10700 Thailand (nonghor@yahoo.com).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness of daily bathing with 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths in preventing multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-positive bacterial colonization and bloodstream infection.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label controlled trial was conducted in 4 medical intensive care units (ICUs) in Thailand from December 2013 to January 2015. Patients were randomized to receive cleansing with non-antimicrobial soap (control group) or 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths used to wipe the patient’s body once daily (chlorhexidine group). Swabs were taken from nares, axilla, antecubital, groin, and perianal areas on admission and on day 3, 5, 7, and 14. The 5 outcomes were (1) favorable events ( all samples negative throughout ICU admission, or initially positive samples with subsequent negative samples); (2) MDR bacteria colonization-free time; (3) hospital-acquired infection; (4) length of ICU and hospital stay; (5) adverse skin reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 481 patients were randomly assigned to the control group (241) or the chlorhexidine group (240). Favorable events at day 14 were observed in 34.8% of patients in the control group and 28.6% in the chlorhexidine group (P=.79). Median MDR bacteria colonization-free times were 5 days in both groups. The incidence rate of hospital-acquired infection and the length of the ICU and hospital stay did not differ significantly between groups. The incidence of adverse skin reactions in the chlorhexidine group was 2.5%.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of 2% chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths for the prevention of MDR gram-negative bacteria colonization and hospital-acquired infection in adult patients in ICU was not proven.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01989416.

Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016;37(3):245–253

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Pumart, P, Phodha, T, Thamlikitkul, V, Riewpaiboon, A, Prakongsai, P, Limwattananon, S. Health and economic impacts of antimicrobial resistant infections in Thailand: a preliminary study. J Health Syst Res 2012;6:352360.Google Scholar
2. Chavers, LS, Moser, SA, Benjamin, WH, et al. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: 15 years and counting. J Hosp Infect 2003;53:159171.Google Scholar
3. Safdar, N, Bradley, EA. The risk of infection after nasal colonization with Staphylococcus aureus . Am J Med 2008;121:310315.Google Scholar
4. Ren, Y, Ma, G, Peng, L, Ren, Y, Zhang, F. Active screening of multi-drug resistant bacteria effectively prevent and control the potential infections. Cell Biochem Biophys 2015;71:12351238.Google Scholar
5. Latibeaudiere, R, Rosa, R, Laowansiri, P, Arheart, K, Namias, N, Munoz-Price, LS. Surveillance cultures growing carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii predict the development of clinical infections: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 2015;60:415422.Google Scholar
6. Kassakian, SZ, Mermel, LA, Jefferson, JA, Parenteau, SL, Machan, JT. Impact of chlorhexidine bathing on hospital-acquired infections among general medical patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011;32:238243.Google Scholar
7. Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97132.Google Scholar
8. Puig Silla, M, Montiel Company, JM, Almerich Silla, JM. Use of chlorhexidine varnishes in preventing and treating periodontal disease: a review of the literature. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E257E260.Google Scholar
9. Bleasdale, SC, Trick, WE, Gonzalez, IM, Lyles, RD, Hayden, MK, Weinstein, RA. Effectiveness of chlorhexidine bathing to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infections in medical intensive care unit patients. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:20732079.Google Scholar
10. Climo, MW, Sepkowitz, KA, Zuccotti, G, et al. The effect of daily bathing with chlorhexidine on the acquisition of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, and healthcare-associated bloodstream infections: results of a quasi-experimental multicenter trial. Crit Care Med 2009;37:18581865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Climo, MW, Yokoe, DS, Warren, DK, et al. Effect of daily chlorhexidine bathing on hospital-acquired infection. N Engl J Med 2013;368:533542.Google Scholar
12. Munoz-Price, LS, Hota, B, Stemer, A, Weinstein, RA. Prevention of bloodstream infections by use of daily chlorhexidine baths for patients at a long-term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:10311035.Google Scholar
13. Popovich, KJ, Hota, B, Hayes, R, Weinstein, RA, Hayden, MK. Effectiveness of routine patient cleansing with chlorhexidine gluconate for infection prevention in the medical intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009;30:959963.Google Scholar
14. Vernon, MO, Hayden, MK, Trick, WE, Hayes, RA, Blom, DW, Weinstein, RA. Chlorhexidine gluconate to cleanse patients in a medical intensive care unit: the effectiveness of source control to reduce the bioburden of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:306312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Derde, LP, Dautzenberg, MJ, Bonten, MJ. Chlorhexidine body washing to control antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in intensive care units: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:931939.Google Scholar
16. Choorat, C, Rattanaumpawan, P, Thamlikitkul, V. Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistance Bacteria Colonization Among Hospitalized General Medical Patients at Siriraj Hospital [dissertation]. Bangkok: Mahidol University, 2014.Google Scholar
17. Block, SS. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation, 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001:321336.Google Scholar
18. Chlorhexidine gluconate 2% w/v impregnated pads PL27821/0004: UK Public Assessment Report. Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency website. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/home/groups/par/documents/websiteresources/con091190.pdf. Updated July 7, 2010. Accessed October 15, 2015.Google Scholar
19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 23rd informational supplement. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2013:M100S23.Google Scholar
20. Bass, P, Karki, S, Rhodes, D, et al. Impact of chlorhexidine-impregnated washcloths on reducing incidence of vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization in hematology-oncology patients. Am J Infect Control 2013;41:345348.Google Scholar
21. Karki, S, Cheng, AC. Impact of non-rinse skin cleansing with chlorhexidine gluconate on prevention of healthcare-associated infections and colonization with multi-resistant organisms: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2012;82:7184.Google Scholar
22. Evans, HL, Dellit, TH, Chan, J, Nathens, AB, Maier, RV, Cuschieri, J. Effect of chlorhexidine whole-body bathing on hospital-acquired infections among trauma patients. Arch Surg 2010;145:240246.Google Scholar
23. Ridenour, G, Lampen, R, Federspiel, J, Kritchevsky, S, Wong, E, Climo, M. Selective use of intranasal mupirocin and chlorhexidine bathing and the incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection among intensive care unit patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007;28:11551161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Cassir, N, Papazian, L, Fournier, PE, Raoult, D, La Scola, B. Insights into bacterial colonization of intensive care patients’ skin: the effect of chlorhexidine daily bathing. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2015;34:9991004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. McDonnell, G, Russell, AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev 1999;12:147179.Google Scholar
26. Hassan, KA, Jackson, SM, Penesyan, A, et al. Transcriptomic and biochemical analyses identify a family of chlorhexidine efflux proteins. Pro Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:2025420259.Google Scholar
27. Apisarnthanarak, A, Pinitchai, U, Warachan, B, Warren, DK, Khawcharoenporn, T, Hayden, MK. Effectiveness of infection prevention measures featuring advanced source control and environmental cleaning to limit transmission of extremely-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in a Thai intensive care unit: an analysis before and after extensive flooding. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:116121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Munoz-Price, LS, Hayden, MK, Lolans, K, et al. Successful control of an outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae at a long-term acute care hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:341347.Google Scholar
29. Popovich, KJ, Hota, B, Hayes, R, Weinstein, RA, Hayden, MK. Daily skin cleansing with chlorhexidine did not reduce the rate of central-line associated bloodstream infection in a surgical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med 2010;36:854858.Google Scholar
30. Noto, MJ, Domenico, HJ, Byrne, DW, et al. Chlorhexidine bathing and health care-associated infections: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;313:369378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Martinez-Resendez, MF, Garza-Gonzalez, E, Mendoza-Olazaran, S, et al. Impact of daily chlorhexidine baths and hand hygiene compliance on nosocomial infection rates in critically ill patients. Am J Infect Control 2014;42:713717.Google Scholar
32. Chen, W, Cao, Q, Li, S, et al. Impact of daily bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate on ventilator associated pneumonia in intensive care units: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Dis 2015;7:746753.Google ScholarPubMed