Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:04:33.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Drainage Bag Additive Saga

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Calvin M. Kunin*
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
*
Pomerene Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Rm M110 Starling-Loving Hall, 320 W. 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210-1240
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1985

References

1.Kunin, CM: Genitourinary infections in the patientnt risk: Extrinsic risk factors. Am J Med 1984; 75(5A):131139.Google Scholar
2.Givens, CD, Wenzel, RP: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections in surgical patients: A controlled study on the excess morbidity and costs. J Urol 1980; 124:646648.Google Scholar
3.Dukes, C: Urinary infections after excision of the rectum: Their cause and prevention. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 1928;22:111.Google Scholar
4.Maizels, M, Schaeffer, AJ: Decreased incidence of bacteriuria associated with periodic instillations of hydrogen peroxide in the urethral catheter drainage bag. J Urol 1980; 123:841845.Google Scholar
5.Evans, AT, Cicmanic, JF: The role of Betadine microbicides in urine bag sterilization, in Proceedings of the Second World Congress on A ntisepsis, New York, H.P. Publishing, 1980, pp 8586.Google Scholar
6.Southampton Infection Control Team. Evaluation of aseptic techniques and Chlorhexidine on the rate of catheter-associated urinary-tract infection. Lancet 1982; 1:8991.Google Scholar
7.Thompson, RL, Haley, CE, Searcy, MA, et al: Catheter-associated bacteriuria: Failure to reduce attack rates using periodic instillations of a disinfectant into urinary drainage systems. JAMA 1984; 251:747751.Google Scholar
8.Gillespie, WA, Jones, JE, Teasdale, C, et al: Does the addition of disinfectant to urine drainage bags prevent infection in calheterized patients? Lancet 1983; 2:10371039.Google Scholar
9.Kunin, CM, McCormack, RC: Prevention of catheter-induced urinary tract infections by sterile closed drainage. N Engl J Med 1966; 274:11561161.Google Scholar
10.Schaeffer, AJ: Catheter-associated bacteriuria in patients in reverse isolation. J Urol 1982; 128:752754.Google Scholar
11.Kass, EH, Schneiderman, LJ: Entry of bacteria into the urinary tracts of patients with inlying catheters. N Engl J Med 1957; 256:556557.Google Scholar
12.Garibaldi, RA, Burke, JP, Britt, MR, et al: Meatal colonization and catheter-associated bacteriuria. N Engl J Med 1980; 303:216218.Google Scholar
13.Daifuku, R, Stamm, WE: Association of rectal and urethral colonization with urinary tract infection in patients with indwelling catheters. JAMA 1984; 252:20282030.Google Scholar
14.Kunin, CM, Steele, C: Culture of the surface of urinary catheters to sample the urethral flora and study the effect of antimicrobial therapy. J Clin Microbiol 1985, to be published.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Maki, DG, Hennekens, CG, Phillips, CW, et alNosocomial urinary tract infection with Seiratia marscescens: An epidemiologic study. J Infect Dis 1973; 128:579587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Schaberg, DR, Alford, RH, Anderson, R, et al: An outbreak of nosocomial infection due to multiply resistant Seiratia marscescens: Evidence for interhospital spread. Infect Dis 1976; 134:181188.Google Scholar