Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Detection of Postoperative Surgical-Site Infections: Comparison of Health Plan–Based Surveillance With Hospital-Based Programs

  • Kenneth E. Sands (a1) (a2), Deborah S. Yokoe (a1) (a3) (a4), David C. Hooper (a1) (a3) (a4) (a5), John L. Tully (a1) (a6), Teresa C. Horan (a7), Robert P. Gaynes (a7), Steven L. Solomon (a7) and Richard Platt (a1) (a3) (a4) (a8)...

Abstract

Background:

Review of health plan administrative data has been shown to be more sensitive than other methods for identifying postdischarge surgical-site infections (SSIs), but there has not been a direct comparison between this method and hospital-based surveillance for all infections, including those diagnosed before discharge. We compared these two methods for identifying SSIs following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures:.

Methods:

We studied 1,352 CABG procedures performed among members of one health plan from March 1993 through June 1997. Health plan administrative records were reviewed based on claims containing diagnoses or procedures suggestive of infection or outpatient dispensing of antibiotics appropriate for SSI. Hospital-based surveillance information was also reviewed. SSI rates were calculated based on the total events identified by either mechanism.

Results:

Postdischarge information was reviewed for 328 (85%) of 388 procedures. SSIs were confirmed in 167 patients (13% overall risk of confirmed SSI; range, 3% to 14% in the 5 hospitals). The overall sensitivity of hospital-based surveillance was 49.7% (83 of 167), and that of health plan data was 71.8% (120 of 167). There was no significant difference among hospitals in the sensitivity of either surveillance mechanism.

Conclusions:

Surveillance based on health plan data identified more postoperative infections, including those occurring before discharge, than did hospital-based surveillance. Screening administrative data and pharmacy activity may be an important adjunct to SSI surveillance, allowing efficient comparison of hospital-specific rates. Interpretation of differences among hospitals' infection rates requires case mix adjustment and understanding of variations in hospitals' discharge diagnosis coding practices

Copyright

Corresponding author

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215

References

Hide All
1.Haley, RW, Culver, DH, White JW et al.The efficacy of infection surveillance and control programs in preventing nosocomial infections in US hospitals. Am J Epidemiol 985;121:182205.
2.Gaynes, RP, Horan, TC. Surveillance of nosocomial infections. In: Mayhall, CG, ed. Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 1999.
3.Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WL. Guideline for the prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999;20:250278.
4.Emori, TG, Edwards, JR, Culver, DH, et al.Accuracy of reporting nosocomial infections in intensive-care-unit patients to the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system: a pilot study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:308316.
5.Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Platt, R. Surgical site infections occurring after hospital discharge. J Infect Dis 1996;173:963970.
6.Reimer, K, Gleed, G, Nicolle, LE. The impact of postdischarge infection on surgical wound infection rates. Infection Control 1987;8:237240.
7.Manian, FA, Meyer, L. Comprehensive surveillance of surgical wound infections in outpatient and inpatient surgery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1990;11:515520.
8.Burns, SJ. Postoperative wound infections detected during hospitalization and after discharge in a community hospital. Am J Infect Control 1982;10:6065.
9.Polk, BF, Shapiro, M, Goldstein, P, Tager, I, Gore-White, B, Schoenbaum, SC. Randomised clinical trial of perioperative cefazolin in preventing infection after hysterectomy. Lancet 1980;1:437441.
10.Brown, RB, Bradley, S, Opitz, E, Cipriani, D, Pieczrka, R, Sands, M. Surgical wound infections documented after hospital discharge. Am J Infect Control 1987;15:5458.
11.Byrne, DJ, Lynce, W, Napier, A, Davey, P, Malek, M, Cuschieri, A. Wound infection rates: the importance of definition and post-discharge wound surveillance. J Hosp Infect 1994;26:3743.
12.Holtz, TH, Wenzel, RP. Postdischarge surveillance for nosocomial wound infection: a brief review and commentary. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:206213.
13.Sherertz, RJ, Garibaldi, RA, Marosok, RD. Consensus paper on the surveillance of surgical site infections. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:263270.
14.Sands, K, Vineyard, G, Livingston, J, Christiansen, C, Platt, R. Efficient identification of postdischarge surgical site infections using automated medical records. J Infect Dis 1999;179:434441.
15.Kaye, KS, Sands, K, Donahue, JG, Chan, KA, Fishman, P, Platt, R. Preoperative drug dispensing predicts surgical site infection. Emerg Infect Dis 2001;7:5765.
16.Horan, TC, Gaynes, RP, Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Am J Infect Control 1992;20:271274.
17.Newcombe, RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med 1998;17:873890.
18.Perencevich, EN, Sands, KE, Cosgrove, SE, Guadagnoli, E, Meara, E, Platt, R. Health and economic impact of surgical site infections diagnosed after hospital discharge. Emerg Infect Dis 2003;9:196203.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
  • ISSN: 0899-823X
  • EISSN: 1559-6834
  • URL: /core/journals/infection-control-and-hospital-epidemiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed