Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Controlled Trial Measuring the Effect of a Feedback Intervention on Hand Hygiene Compliance in a Step-Down Unit

  • Alexandre R. Marra (a1), Cláudia D'Arco (a1), Bruno de Arruda Bravim (a1), Marinês Dalla Valle Martino (a2), Luci Correa (a3), Cláudia Vallone Silva, Luiz Carlos R. Lamblet (a3), Moacyr Silva Junior (a1), Gisele de Lima (a1), Luciana Reis Guastelli (a1), Luciana Barbosa (a4), Oscar Fernando Pavão dos Santos (a1) and Michael B. Edmond (a5)...

Abstract

Objective.

To evaluate hand hygiene compliance in 2 adult step-down units (SDUs).

Design.

A 6-month (from March to September 2007), controlled trial comparing 2 SDUs, one with a feedback intervention program (ie, the intervention unit) and one without (ie, the control unit).

Setting.

Two 20-bed SDUs at a tertiary care private hospital.

Methods.

Hand hygiene episodes were measured by electronic recording devices and periodic observational surveys. In the intervention unit, feedback was provided by the SDU nurse manager, who explained twice a week to the healthcare workers the goals and targets for the process measures.

Results.

A total of 117,579 hand hygiene episodes were recorded in the intervention unit, and a total of 110,718 were recorded in the control unit (P = .63). There was no significant difference in the amount of chlorhexidine used in the intervention and control units (34.0 vs 26.7 L per 1,000 patient-days; P = .36) or the amount of alcohol gel used (72.5 vs 70.7 L per 1,000 patient-days; P = .93). However, in both units, healthcare workers used alcohol gel more frequently than chlorhexidine (143.2 vs 60.7 L per 1,000 patient-days; P < .001). Nosocomial infection rates in the intervention and control units, respectively, were as follows: for bloodstream infection, 3.5 and 0.79 infections per 1,000 catheter-days (P = .18); for urinary tract infection, 15.8 and 15.7 infections per 1,000 catheter-days (P = .99); and for tracheostomy-associated pneumonia, 10.7 and 5.1 infections per 1,000 device-days (P = . 13). There were no cases of infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci and only a single case of infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (in the control unit).

Conclusions.

The feedback intervention regarding hand hygiene had no significant effect on the rate of compliance. Other measures must be used to increase and sustain the rate of hand hygiene compliance.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Av. Albert Einstein, 627/701, Intensive Care Unit, 5th floor, Morumbi, Sao Paulo 05651-901, Brazil (a.marra@uol.com.br)

References

Hide All
1.Pittet, D, Mourouga, P, Perneger, TV; Members of the Infection Control Program. Compliance with handwashing in a teaching hospital. Ann Intern Med 1999;30:126130.
2.Boyce, JM, Pittet, D; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee; HICPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health-Care Settings: recommendations of the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee and the HIPAC/SHEA/APIC/IDSA Hand Hygiene Task Force. Am J Infect Control 2002;30:S1S46.
3.Miyachi, H, Furuya, H, Umezawa, K, et al.Controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by stepwise implementation of preventive strategies in a university hospital: impact of a link-nurse system on the basis of multidisciplinary approaches. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:115121.
4.Harris, AD, Lautenbach, E, Perencevich, E. A systematic review of quasi-experimental study designs in the fields of infection control and antibiotic resistance. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:7782.
5.Gould, DJ, Chudleigh, JH, Moralejo, D, Drey, N. Interventions to improve hand hygiene compliance in patient care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD005186.
6.Berhe, M, Edmond, MB, Bearman, GM. Practices and an assessment of health care workers' perceptions of compliance with infection control knowledge of nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control 2005;33:5557.
7.Bischoff, WE, Reynolds, TM, Sessler, CN, Edmond, MB, Wenzel, RP. Handwashing compliance by health care workers. The impact of introducing an accessible, alcohol-based hand antiseptic. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:10171021.
8.Muto, CA, Sistrom, MG, Farr, BM. Hand hygiene rates unaffected by installation of dispensers of a rapidly acting hand antiseptic. Am J Infect Control 2000;28:273276.
9.Kinsella, G, Thomas, AN, Taylor, RJ. Electronic surveillance of wall-mounted soap and alcohol gel dispensers in an intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:3439.
10.Garner, JS, Jarvis, WR, Emori, TG, Horan, TC, Hughes, JM. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections (published correction appears in Am J Infect Control 1988;16:177). Am J Infect Control 1988;16:128140.
11.Tenover, FC, Arbeit, RD, Goering, RV, et al.Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1995;33:22332239.
12.Keene, AR, Cullen, DJ. Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System: update 1983. Crit Care Med 1983;11:13.
13.Bittner, MJ, Rich, EC, Turner, PD, Arnold, WH Jr. Limited impact of sustained simple feedback based on soap and paper towel consumption on the frequency of hand washing in an adult intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:120126.
14.Harris, AD, Bradham, DD, Baumgarten, M, Zuckerman, IH, Fink, JC, Perencevich, EN. The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38:15861591.
15.Haas, JP, Larson, EL. Measurement of compliance with hand hygiene. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:614.
16.Gould, DJ, Chudleigh, J, Drey, NS, Moralejo, D. Measuring handwashing performance in health service audits and research studies. J Hosp Infect 2007;66:109115.
17.Rupp, ME, Fitzgerald, T, Puumala, S, et al.Prospective, controlled, crossover trial of alcohol-based hand gel in critical care units. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008;29:815.
18.Pittet, D, Hugonnet, S, Harbarth, S, et al.Effectiveness of a hospital wide programme to improve compliance with hand antisepsis. Lancet 2000;356:13071312.
19.Warren, DK, Guth, RM, Coopersmith, CM, Merz, LR, Zack, JE, Fraser, VJ. Impact of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus active surveillance program on contact precaution utilization in a surgical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2007;35:430434.
20.Lucet, JC, Paoletti, X, Lolom, I, et al.Successful long-term program for controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:10511017.
21.Davis, KA, Stewart, JJ, Crouch, HK, Florez, CE, Hospenthal, DR. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at hospital admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection. Clin Infect Dis 2004;39:776782.
22.Edwards, JR, Peterson, KD, Andrus, ML, et al.National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Report, data summary for 2006, issued June 2007. Am J Infect Control 2007;35:290301.
23.Broughall, JM, Marshman, C, Jackson, B, Bird, P. An automatic monitoring system for measuring handwashing frequency in hospital wards. J Hosp Infect 1984;5:447453.
24.Larson, EL, Eke, PI, Wilder, MP, Laughon, BE. Quantity of soap as a variable in handwashing. Infect Control 1987;8:371375.
25.Moret, L, Tequi, B, Lombrial, P. Should self-assessment methods be used to measure compliance with handwashing recommendations? A study carried out in a French university hospital. Am J Infect Control 2004;32:384390.
26.Ojajärvi, J, Mäkelä, P, Rantasalo, I. Failure of hand disinfection with frequent hand washing: a need for prolonged field studies. J Hyg (Lond) 1977;79:107119.
27.Winnefeld, M, Richard, MA, Drancourt, M, Grobb, JJ. Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use. Br J Dermatol 2000;143:546550.
28.Gawande, A. Better: A Surgeon's Notes on Performance. 1st ed. New York: Metropolitan Books; 2007.

Controlled Trial Measuring the Effect of a Feedback Intervention on Hand Hygiene Compliance in a Step-Down Unit

  • Alexandre R. Marra (a1), Cláudia D'Arco (a1), Bruno de Arruda Bravim (a1), Marinês Dalla Valle Martino (a2), Luci Correa (a3), Cláudia Vallone Silva, Luiz Carlos R. Lamblet (a3), Moacyr Silva Junior (a1), Gisele de Lima (a1), Luciana Reis Guastelli (a1), Luciana Barbosa (a4), Oscar Fernando Pavão dos Santos (a1) and Michael B. Edmond (a5)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed