Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T16:03:52.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of Broth and Filtration Methods for Culturing of Intravenous Fluids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Jenice N. Longfield ,
Patricia Charache ,
Earl L. Diamond  and
Timothy R. Townsend
Jenice N. Longfield*
Affiliation:
Hospital Epidemiology Unit and the Microbiology Division of Laboratory Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
Patricia Charache
Affiliation:
Hospital Epidemiology Unit and the Microbiology Division of Laboratory Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
Earl L. Diamond
Affiliation:
Hospital Epidemiology Unit and the Microbiology Division of Laboratory Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
Timothy R. Townsend
Affiliation:
Hospital Epidemiology Unit and the Microbiology Division of Laboratory Medicine, and the Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
*
Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, MD 20014
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ninety-six specimens of intravenous fluid solutions (D5/025 NS) were inoculated with S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, E. agglomerans, or C. albicans in concentrations of .1, 1, 10, or 102 organisms/ml. They were cultured in tubes containing 5 ml of double enriched broth and after passage through a .45 μ pore membrane filter. After 24 hours of incubation, broth cultures were 68% as sensitive as the filter cultures (p<.001). At the lowest concentration (.1 organism/ml) broth cultures were only 45% as sensitive as the membrane filter technique after 24 hours of growth (p<.001). Membrane filters provide a rapid method to accurately detect and quantitate the presence of microbial contamination even at very low levels of concentration. The simplicity and accuracy of the filtration method offers the clinician a valuable adjunct in managing suspected cases of intravenous fluid related sepsis.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 3 , Issue 5 , October 1982 , pp. 397 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Maki, DG, Goldmann, DA, Rhame, FS: Infection control in intravenous therapy. Ann Intern Med 1973;79:867–887.Google Scholar
2. Cundy, KR, Ball, W (eds): Infection Control in Health Care Facilities: Microbiological Surveillance. Baltimore, University Park Press, 1977.Google Scholar
3. Mackel, DC, Maki, DG, Anderson, RL, et al: Nationwide epidemic of septicemia caused by contaminated intravenous products: Mechanisms of intrinsic contamination. J Clin Microbiol 1975;2:485–497.Google Scholar
4. Maki, DG: Growth properties of microorganisms in infusion fluid and methods of detection, in Phillips, I, Meers, PD, D'Arcy, PF (eds): Microbiological Hazards of Infusion Therapy. Littleton, Massachusetts, Publishing Sciences Group Inc. 1976, pp 13–47.Google Scholar
5. National Coordinating Committee on Large Volume Parenterals: Recommended procedures for in-use testing of large volume parenterals suspected of contamination or of producing a reaction in a patient. Am J Hasp Pharm 1978;35:678–682.Google Scholar
6. Code of Federal Regulations. July 1976;40:142.10, 141.28.Google Scholar
7. Armitage, P: Statistical Methods in Medical Research. New York. John Wiley & Sons, 1971.Google Scholar
8. McKee, JE, McLaughlin, RT, Lesgourgues, P: Application of molecular filter techniques to the bacterial assay of sewage. Sewage Ind Wastes 1958;30:245–252.Google Scholar
9. Brown, W, Kelsh, W: Improved method for cultivation of brucella from the blood. Proc Sot Exp Biol Med 1954;85:154–155.Google Scholar
10. Tidewell, WL, Gee, LL: Use of membrane filter in blood cultures. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1955;88:561–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Winn, WR, White, ML, Carter, WT, et al: Rapid diagnosis of bacteremia with quantitative differential-membrane filtration culture. JAMA 1966;197(7):539–548.Google Scholar
12. Kozub, WR, Kirkham, WR, Chatman, CF, et al: A practical blood culturing method employing dilution and filtration. Am J Clin Pathol 1969;52:105–113.Google Scholar
13. Finegold, SM, White, M, Ziment, I, et al: Rapid diagnosis of bacteremia Appl Microbiol 1969;18:458–463.Google Scholar
11. Buxton, AE, Highsmith, AK, Garner, JS, et al: Contamination of intravenous infusion fluid: Effects of changing administration sets. Ann Intern Med 1979;90:764–768.Google Scholar
15. Band, JD, Maki, DG: Safety of changing intravenous delivery systems at longer than 24-hour intervals. Ann Intern Med 1979;91:173–178.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed