Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T21:30:51.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Brucellosis Among Hospital Employees in Saudi Arabia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Frank W. Kiel
Affiliation:
King I&had National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
M. Yousuf Khan*
Affiliation:
King I&had National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
*
Infectious Diseases, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, P.O. Box 22490, Riyadh 11426, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Objective:

To report experience with brucellosis among expatriate hospital employees in an area of the world where brucellosis is endemic.

Design:

Review of cases from the viewpoints of direct supervisor and treating physician, including epidemiologic interviews and clinical follow-up.

Setting:

Tertiary care hospital center in a developing country that increased from 125 beds to 450 beds during the period studied.

Patients:

Employees with clinical findings suggesting brucellosis and in whom a positive blood culture or significantly elevated serologic test confirmed the diagnosis.

Results:

Nine hospital employees from nonendemic areas developed brucellosis. Five were from England and four from North America. Seven were bacteriology technologists, one was a nurse, and one was an obstetrician. Each had an acute febrile illness with malaise, arthralgia, or headache. Brucella titers were ≥ 1:1,280. Five were bacteremic with positive Brucella cultures. All responded to anti-Brucella therapy. Three patients had relapses, but there were no complications.

Conclusions:

Among Saudi patients, brucellosis is generally attributable to drinking infected milk or contacting infected animals. On the other hand, among expatriate hospital employees, the infection is likely due to processing Brucella cultures or dealing with infected body fluids. In 1988, the laboratory began stricter infection control measures. Since then, there has been only one case of brucellosis among the hospital employees.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kiel, FW, Khan, MY. Brucellosis in Saudi Arabia. Soc Sci Med. 1989:29:9991001.Google Scholar
2. Khan, MY Brucellosis: observations on 100 patients. Ann Saudi Med. 1986;6:S19S23.Google Scholar
3. Pike, RM. Laboratory-associated infections: incidence, fatalities, causes, and prevention. Ann Rev Microbiol. 1979;33:4146.Google Scholar
4. Kaufmann, AF, Fox, MD, Boyce, JM, et al. Airborne spread of brucellosis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1980;353:105114.Google Scholar
5. Anon, . How does Brucella abortus infect human beings? Lancet. 1983;2:1180.Google Scholar
6. Kiel, FW, Khan, MY. Analysis of 506 consecutive positive serologic tests for brucellosis in Saudi Arabia. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:13841387.Google Scholar
7. Meyer, KE Eddie, B. Laboratory infections due to Brucella. J Infect Dis. 1941;68:2432.Google Scholar
8. Howe, C, Miller, ES, Kelly, EH, Bookwalter, HL, Ellingson, HV. Acute brucellosis among laboratory workers. N Engl J Med. 1947;236:741747.Google Scholar
9. Montes, J, Rodriguez, MA, Martin, T, Martin, F. Laboratory-acquired meningitis caused by Brucella abortus strain 19. J Infect Dis. 1986;154:915.Google Scholar
10. Ollé-Goig, JE, Canela-Soler, J. An outbreak of Brucella melitensis infection by airborne transmission among laboratory workers. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:335338.Google Scholar
11. Al-Aska, AK, Chagla, AH. Laboratory-acquired brucellosis. J Hosp Infect. 1989;14:6971.Google Scholar
12. Nelson, KE, Ruben, FL, Andersen, B. An unusual outbreak of brucellosis. Arch Intern Med. 1975;135:691695.Google Scholar
13. Staszkiewicz, J, Lewis, CM, Colville, J, Zervos, M, Band, J. Outbreak of Brucella melitensis among microbiology laboratory workers in a community hospital. J Clin Microbiol. 1991;29:287290.Google Scholar