Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Bactericidal Activity of Copper and Non-Copper Paints

  • Timothy E. Cooney (a1)

Abstract

Objective:

To screen copper and noncopper paints for their bactericidal effectiveness in rendering surfaces self-disinfecting.

Design:

Tested paints were applied to glass coverslips, cured, inoculated with test organisms (Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterococcus faecalis), and dried. After 0, 24, or 48 hours, surviving organisms were eluted and enumerated, and counts compared with those obtained from inoculated control (unpainted) coverslips for the corresponding time periods. Copper elution from select copper paints was quantified by complete immersion of coated coverslips followed by spectroscopic analysis to infer a threshold relationship between kill and copper release.

Results:

Nearly all of the tested copper paints were capable of reducing organism counts to negligible levels within 24 hours. Exterior latex paints supplemented with a fungicide were similarly efficacious. Standard interior latex paint reduced bacterial counts to nearly zero within 24 hours for E coli and P aeruginosa, and to zero within 48 hours for E faecalis. However, substantial survival of S aureus occurred (up to 4 logs at 24 hours). Chi-squared analysis of elution and cidal data indicated that lethality was dependent on copper release in excess of 32 μg.

Conclusion:

The data support presumptive bactericidal claims for several copper and noncopper paints. Despite controversy over environment-based contagion, such paints could be used to render surfaces self-disinfecting in strategic locations where environmental causation of nosocomial infections is suspected.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Research Department, Hamot Medical Center, 201 State St, Erie, PA 16550

References

Hide All
1. NNIS Report. Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1991:12(10):609621.
2.Martone, WJ, Jarvis, WR, Culver, DW, Haley, RW. Incidence and nature of endemic and epidemic nosocomial infections. In: Bennet, JS, Brachman, PS, eds. Hospital Infections. Boston, MA: Little, Brown. and Co; 1991:593.
3.Chiodo, F, Falasca, P, Finzi, G. The role of antiseptics and disinfectants in the control of nosocomial infections. J Chemother 1989; 1 (suppl 1): 2527.
4.Gupta, AK, Anand, NK, Manmohan, , Lamba, IM. Gupta, R, Srivastava, L. Role of bacteriological monitoring of the hospital environment and medical equipment in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 1991;19(4):263271.
5.Crombach, WH, Kijkshoorn, L, van Noort-KIaassen, M, Niessen, J. van Knippenberg-Gordebeke, G. Control of an epidemic spread of a multi-resistant strain of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus in a hospital. Intern Med 1989;15(3):166170.
6.Allen, KD, Green, HT. Hospital outbreak of multi-resistant Acinetobacter anitratus: an airborne mode of spread? J Hosp Infect 1987:9(2):110119.
7.Taguchi, F, Saito-Taki, T, Okuda, S. et al.Proposal for the nosocomial infection control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi 1992;47(6):767775. Abstract.
8.Telander, B, Lerner, R, Palmblad, J, Ringertz, O. Corynebacterium group JK in a hematological ward: infections, colonization and environmental contamination. Scand J Infect Dis 1988;20(1):5561. Abstract.
9.Kuhn, PJ. Doorknobs: a source of nosocomial infections? Diagn Med 1983;6(8):6263.
10.Shafer Environmental Associates, Ltd. Staff. Published exposure limits listed by chemical name. In: Shafer, D, ed. The Book Of Chemical Lists. Madison, CT: Business and Legal Reports: 1991;1:70227.
11.Blair, WR, Olson, GJ, Trout, TKJewett, KL, Brinckman, FE. Accumulation and Fate of Tributyltin Species in Microbial Biofilms. US Department of Commerce, NISI 1988; NISTIR 88-3852.
12.James, AM. Molecular aspects of biological surfaces. Chem Soc Rev 1979;8:389418.
13.Elliot, HA, Huang, CP. Absorption characteristics of heavy metals. Environ Int 1979;2:4555.
14.James, AM. The electrical properties and topochemistry of bacterial cells. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 1982;15:171221.
15.Doyle, RJ. How cell walls of gram-positive bacteria interact with metal ions. In: Beveridge, TJ, Doyle, RJ, eds. Metal Ions and Bacteria. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons; 1989:275293.
16.Ferris, FG. Metallic ion interactions with the outer membrane of gram negative bacteria. In: Beveridge, TJ. Doyle, RJ, eds. Metal Ions and Bacteria. New York, NY: Wiley & Sons; 1989295323.
17.Doyle, RJ, Matthews, TH, Streips, UN. Chemical basis for selectivity of metal ions by the Bacillus subtilis cell wall. J Bacteriol 1980;143(1):471480.
18.Tetaz, TJ, Luke, RKJ. Plasmid-controlled resistance to copper in Escherichia coli J Bacteriol 1983;154:12631268.
19.Brown, NL, Camakaris, J, Lee, BTO, et al.Bacterial resistance to mercury and copper. J Cell Biochem 1991;46:106114.
20.Cooksey, DA, Azad, HR, Cha, JS, Lim, CK. Copper resistance gene homologs in pathogenic and saprophytic bacterial species from tomatoes. Appl Environ Microbial 1990;56(2):431435.
21.Brown, NL, Rouch, DALee, BTO. Copper resistance determinants in bacteria. Plasmid 1992;27:4151.

Bactericidal Activity of Copper and Non-Copper Paints

  • Timothy E. Cooney (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed