Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Assessment of a Novel Approach to Evaluate the Outcome of Endoscope Reprocessing

  • Andreas Tietz (a1), Marc Dangel (a1) and Andreas F. Widmer (a1)
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Assessment of a Novel Approach to Evaluate the Outcome of Endoscope Reprocessing
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Assessment of a Novel Approach to Evaluate the Outcome of Endoscope Reprocessing
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Assessment of a Novel Approach to Evaluate the Outcome of Endoscope Reprocessing
      Available formats
      ×

Abstract

Copyright

References

Hide All
1. Sciortino, CV, Xia, EL, Mozee, A. Assessment of a novel approach to evaluate the outcome of endoscope reprocessing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2004;25:284290.
2. Mackett, D, Kessock-Philip, S, Bascomb, S, Easmon, CS. Evaluation of the Lumac kit for the detection of bacteriuria by bioluminescence. J Clin Pathol 1982;35:107110.
3. Martin, ET, Cote, JA, Perry, LK, Martin, WJ. Clinical evaluation of the Lumac bioluminescence method for screening urine specimens. J Clin Microbiol 1985;22:1922.
4. Temprano, GC, D'Aquino, M. What is the scope of bioluminescence in pharmaceutical clean rooms monitoring? Boll Chim Farm 2003;142:274276.
5. Lee, J, Deininger, RA. Detection of E. coli in beach water within 1 hour using immuno-magnetic separation and ATP bioluminescence. Luminescence 2004;19:3136.
6. Schneider, DA, Gourse, RL. Relationship between growth rate and ATP concentration in Escherichia coli: a bioassay for available cellular ATP. J Biol Chem 2004;279:82628268.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed