Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:20:58.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Outbreak of Serratia marcescens Bacteremia After General Anesthesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2015

Michael E. Sebert ,
Mary Lou Manning ,
Karin L. McGowan ,
Elizabeth R. Alpern  and
Louis M. Bell
Michael E. Sebert
Affiliation:
Division of Immunologic and Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Mary Lou Manning
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Karin L. McGowan
Affiliation:
Division of Immunologic and Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Elizabeth R. Alpern
Affiliation:
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Louis M. Bell*
Affiliation:
Division of Immunologic and Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Department of Infection Control, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
*
Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th St. and Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate an outbreak of Serratia marcescens bacteremia among patients after general anesthesia.

Design:

A case-control study.

Setting:

A 304-bed, pediatric teaching hospital.

Patients:

Twenty-three pediatric patients who developed S. marcescens bacteremia within 2 weeks after general anesthesia between June 15 and September 22, 1999, were compared with 46 age-matched control-patients who had undergone procedures on the same clinical services of the hospital during the same period.

Results:

Cases were distributed over a wide range of surgical services and were not correlated with exposure to any of the surgical, anesthesia, or nursing staff. Case-patients were significantly more likely than control-patients to have received cefazolin (odds ratio [OR], 11.1; 90% confidence interval [CI90], 1.9 to 24.3) or to have had perioperative placement of a central vascular catheter (OR, 4.2; CI90, 1.2 to 18.8). The timing of the procedures of patients who subsequently developed S. marcescens bacteremia was significantly associated with the shifts of one or more of five operating room technicians (OR, 2.9 to 6.8) who were responsible for preparing intravenous fluids used both to reconstitute perioperatively administered antibiotics and to prime central vascular catheter assemblies.

Conclusions:

Our findings are consistent with a pattern of intermittent contamination due to periodic breaches in sterile technique, rather than a point-source of contamination. The unique challenges that such a procedural breakdown presents to an epidemiologic investigation are discussed. This outbreak stresses the importance of providing comprehensive training in antisepsis when multifunctional personnel are incorporated into an operating room work environment.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 23 , Issue 12 , December 2002 , pp. 733 - 739
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Yu, VL. Serratia marcescens: historical perspective and clinical review. N Engl J Med 1979;300:887–893.Google Scholar
2.Donowitz, LG, Marsik, FJ, Hoyt, JW, Wenzel, RP. Serratia marcescens bacteremia from contaminated pressure transducers. JAMA 1979;242:1749–1751.Google Scholar
3.Villarino, ME, Jarvis, WR, O'Hara, C, Bresnahan, J, Clark, N. Epidemic of Serratia marcescens bacteremia in a cardiac intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 1989;27:2433–2436.Google Scholar
4.Vandenbroucke-Grauls, CMJE, Baars, ACM, Visser, MR, Hulstaert, PF, Verhoef, J. An outbreak of Serratia marcescens traced to a contaminated bronchoscope. J Hosp Infect 1993;23:263–270.Google Scholar
5.Bennett, SN, McNeil, MM, Bland, LA, et al. Postoperative infections traced to contamination of an intravenous anesthetic, propofol. N Engl J Med 1995;333:147–154.Google Scholar
6.Archibald, LK, Corl, A, Shah, B, et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak associated with extrinsic contamination of 1% chlorxylenol soap. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1997;18:704–709.Google Scholar
7.McAllister, TA, Lucas, CE, Mocan, H, et al. Serratia marcescens outbreak in a paediatric oncology unit traced to contaminated Chlorhexidine. Scott Med J 1989;34:525–528.Google Scholar
8.Knowles, S, Herra, C, Devitt, E, et al. An outbreak of multiply resistant Serratia marcescens: the importance of persistent carriage. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000;25:873–877.Google Scholar
9.Smith, PJ, Brookfield, DSK, Shaw, DA, Gray, J. An outbreak of Serratia marcescens infection in a neonatal unit. Lancet 1984;1:151–153.Google Scholar
10.Campbell, JR, Zaccaria, E, Mason, EO, Baker, CJ. Epidemiological analysis defining concurrent outbreaks of Serratia marcescens and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a neonatal intensive-care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:924–928.Google Scholar
11.Christensen, GD, Korones, SB, Reed, L, Bulley, R, McLaughlin, B, Bisno, AL. Epidemic Serratia marcescens in a neonatal intensive care unit: importance of the gastrointestinal tract as a reservoir. Infect Control 1982;3:127–133.Google Scholar
12.Zaidi, M, Sifuentes, J, Bobadilla, M, Moncada, D, Ponce de León, S. Epidemic of Serratia marcescens bacteremia and meningitis in a neonatal unit in Mexico City. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1989;10:14–20.Google Scholar
13.Manning, ML, Archibald, LK, Bell, LM, Banerjee, SN, Jarvis, WR. Serratia marcescens transmission in a pediatric intensive care unit: a multifactorial occurrence. Am J Infect Control 2001;29:115–119.Google Scholar
14.Hoyen, C, Rice, L, Conte, S, Jacobs, MR, Walsh-Sukys, M, Toltzis, P. Use of real time pulsed field gel electrophoresis to guide interventions during a nursery outbreak of Serratia marcescens infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1999;18:357–360.Google Scholar
15.Maslow, JN, Slutsky, AM, Arbeit, RD. The application of pulsed field gel electrophoresis to molecular epidemiology. In: Pershing, DH, Smith, TF, Tenover, FC, White, TJ, eds. Diagnostic Molecular Microbiology: Principles and Applications. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1993:563–572.Google Scholar
16.Miettinen, OS. Estimation of relative risk from individually matched series. Biometrics 1970;26:75–86.Google Scholar