Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Adapting Disease-Specific Isolation Guidelines to a Hospital Information System

  • Julie T. Jacobson (a1), Dickey S. Johnson (a1), Carol A. Ross (a1), Marlyn T. Conti (a1), R. Scott Evans (a1) and John R Burke (a1)...

Abstract

The authors modified the Centers for Disease Control's guideline for disease-specific isolation precautions to a hospital computerized information system. Entering a suspected diagnosis selected from the isolation option on computer terminals generated: 1) a printout listing the isolation instructions, infective material(s), and persons who should avoid exposure; 2) an order for the appropriate supplies; 3) a patient charge based on the supplies required; and 4) an option for stopping, changing, or listing the orders. In order to implement this system, both extensive in-service training for nurses and efforts to change ordering practices of physicians were necessary.

Prevalence surveys before and after computerization were used to evaluate the new system. Combined surveys showed that isolation was ordered for only 21% of patients when indicated. Failure to isolate was identified as a significant problem. As a consequence, continuous surveillance and consultation of all infected patients were instituted, resulting in isolation orders for 81% when indicated. The computerized disease-specific system has resulted in better and more accurate use of isolation, probably due to in service education and surveillance efforts.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Division of Infectious Disease, LDS Hospital, Eighth Avenue and C Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84143

References

Hide All
1.Centers for Disease Control: Isolation Techniques for Use in Hospitals. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, 1975.
2.Garner, J, Simmons, BP: Guideline for isolation precautions in hospitals. Infect Control 1983; 4(4):245325.
3.Saravolatz, LD, Arking, L: Isolation guidelines—A or B? [Editorial]. Infect Control 1984; 5(6):269270.
4.Evans, RS, Gardner, RM, Bush, AR, et al: Development of a computerized infectious disease monitor (CIDM). Comput Biomed Res 1985; 18:103113.
5.Outline for Surveillance and Control of Nosocomial Infections. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control, 1979; 645-588/4995.
6.Garner, J, Kaiser, A: How often is isolation needed? Am J Nurs 1972; 72(4):912.
7.Larson, E: Compliance with isolation technique. Am J Infect Control 1983; 11(6):221225.
8.Larson, E: Bringing the new isolation guideline into focus. Am J Infect Control 1984; 12(6):312317.
9.Goldmann, DA: CDC isolation guidelines: Major revision, new options, in: Conversations in Infection Control 1984(May); 5(3).

Adapting Disease-Specific Isolation Guidelines to a Hospital Information System

  • Julie T. Jacobson (a1), Dickey S. Johnson (a1), Carol A. Ross (a1), Marlyn T. Conti (a1), R. Scott Evans (a1) and John R Burke (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed