Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T22:23:44.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unproctored Online Testing: Environmental Conditions and Validity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

John A. Weiner*
Affiliation:
PSI Services LLC
John D. Morrison JR
Affiliation:
PSI Services LLC
*
E-mail: jweiner@psionline.com, Address: PSI Services LLC., 2950 N. Hollywood Way, Burbank CA 91505

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2009 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davies, S., & Waddlington, P. (2007, April). Interactions in test administration settings: The effect of applicant personality. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York.Google Scholar
Wasko, L. E., Chawla, A., & Scott, D. (2007, April). An examination of the opportunities and challenges presented by proctored vs. unproctored testing. Presentation at the 22nd Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New York.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. A., Reynolds, D., Hayes, T., & Doverspike, D. (2005, April). Unproctored Internet-based testing—Emerging issues and challenges. 20th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. A., & Ruch, W. W. (2006, May). Effects of cheating in unproctored Internet based testing: A Monte Carlo investigation. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar