Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:54:39.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying Individual Identities Is Good, But Examining Intersectionality Is Better

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Katina Sawyer ,
Nicholas Salter  and
Christian Thoroughgood
Katina Sawyer*
Affiliation:
Villanova University
Nicholas Salter
Affiliation:
Ramapo College
Christian Thoroughgood
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
*
E-mail: Katina.Sawyer@villanova.edu, Address: Department of Psychology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, 119A St. Mary Hall, Villanova PA 19805
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

As diversity researchers, it is encouraging to see seasoned scholars discussing the need to study demographic populations that have been historically silenced in our literature. At the same time, although studying singular identities (such as gender, race, sexual orientation, religion, ability, and size) is useful in demonstrating the unique experiences of members of individual groups, investigating the intersection of multiple identities will ultimately provide us with a more holistic perspective on the impact of identity at work. The focal article by Ruggs et al. (2013) suggests this but also underscores the potentially distracting nature of studying multiple identities at once, as well as the possibility for individuals without stigmatized identities to claim that they are also diverse in some way. Though these concerns are worth consideration, we believe it is important to pursue research on singular identities only as a building block to a larger end goal: Studying and understanding the realities of identity through intersectional research. The following commentary will outline our reasons for why studying multiple intersecting identities is vital to achieving a more complete view of diversity at work.

Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 80 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, M. T., & Guidroz, K. (2009). The intersectional approach: Transforming the academy through race, class, and gender. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Choo, H., & Ferree, M. (2010). Practicing intersectionality in sociological research: A critical analysis of inclusions, interactions, and institutions in the study of inequalities. Sociological Theory, 28, 129–149.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989, 139–167.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, K. (1992). Whose story is it anyway? Feminist and antiracist appropriations of Anita Hill. In Morrison, T. (Ed.), Race-ing justice, engendering power. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Crenshaw, C. (1997). Women in the Gulf War: Toward an intersectional feminist rhetorical criticism. Howard Journal of Communication, 8, 219–235.Google Scholar
Gamson, J., & Moon, D. (2004). The sociology of sexualities: Queer and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 47–64.Google Scholar
Jean-Marie, G., Williams, V. A., & Sherman, S. L. (2009). Women's leadership experiences: Examining the intersectionality of race and gender. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11, 562–581.Google Scholar
Kantola, J., & Nousiainen, K. (2009). Institutionalizing intersectionality in Europe. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11, 459–477.10.1080/14616740903237426Google Scholar
Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S., & Washington, E. F. (2012). Can an agentic Black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science, 23, 354–358.10.1177/0956797611428079Google Scholar
Lombardo, E., & Verloo, M. (2009). Institutionalizing intersectionality in the European Union? International Feminist Journal of Politics, 11, 478–495.Google Scholar
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.10.1086/426800Google Scholar
Parker, P. S., & Ogilvie, D. (1996). Gender, culture, and leadership: Toward a culturally distinct model of African-American women executives' leadership strategies. The Leadership Quarterly, 7, 189–214.Google Scholar
Purdie-Vaughns, V. & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinct advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377–391.10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4Google Scholar
Raver, J. L., & Nishii, L. H. (2010). Once, twice, or three time as harmful? Ethnic harassment, gender harassment, and generalized workplace harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 236–254.Google Scholar
Richardson, A., & Loubier, C. (2008). Intersectionality and leadership. International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3, 142–161.Google Scholar
Rosette, A. S., & Livingston, R. W. (2012). Failure is not an option for Black women: Effects of organizational performance on leaders with single versus dual-subordinate identities. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 48, 1162–1167.10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.002Google Scholar
Ruggs, E. N., Law, C., Cox, C. B., Roehling, M. V., Wiener, R. L., Hebl, M. R., & Barron, L. (2013). Gone fishing: I-O psychologists' missed opportunities to understand marginalized employees' experiences with discrimination. Industrial Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 6, 39–60.10.1111/iops.12007Google Scholar
Sanchez-Hucles, J. V., & Davis, D. D. (2010). Women and women of color in leadership: Complexity, identity, and intersectionality. American Psychologist, 65, 171–181.Google Scholar
Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women's racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601.Google Scholar
Valentine, G. (2007). Theorizing and researching intersectionality: A challenge for feminist geography. The Professional Geographer, 59, 10–21.Google Scholar
Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454–463.10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5Google Scholar