Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Personality and the ADA: Ameliorating fairness concerns and maintaining utility

  • Manuel F. Gonzalez (a1) (a2), John F. Capman (a2), Nicholas R. Martin (a2), Tara McClure Johnson (a2), Evan R. Theys (a2) and Anthony S. Boyce (a2)...

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding authors. Emails: manuel.gonzalez@baruch.cuny.edu; john.capman@aon.com

References

Hide All
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Pub. L. No. 101-336, US Code § 12102, 104 Stat. 328 (1990).
Arthur, W. J., & Villado, A. J. (2008). The importance of distinguishing between constructs and methods comparing predictors in personnel selection research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 435442.
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 9, 930.
Brannick, M. T., Cadle, A., & Levine, E. L. (2012). Job analysis for knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics, predictor measures, and performance outcomes. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 119146). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hough, L. M., Oswald, F. L., & Ock, J. (2015). Beyond the big five: New directions for personality research and practice in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 183209.
Jenkins, M., & Griffith, R. (2004). Using personality constructs to predict performance: Narrow or broad bandwidth. Journal of Business Psychology, 19, 255269.
Melson-Silimon, A., Harris, A. M., Shoenfelt, E. L., Miller, J. D., & Carter, N. (2019). Personality testing and the Americans With Disabilities Act: Cause for concern as normal and abnormal personality models are integrated. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(2), 119132.
Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609626.
Ployhart, R., & Holtz, B. C. (2008). The diversity-validity dilemma: Strategies for reducing racioethnic and sex subgroup differences and adverse impact in selection. Personnel Psychology, 61, 153172.
Ren, L. R., Paetzold, R. L., & Colella, R. (2008). A meta-analysis of experimental studies on the effects of disability on human resource judgments. Human Resource Management Review, 18, 191203.
Sackett, P. R., Putka, D. J., & McCloy, R. A. (2012). The concept of validity and the process of validation. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 91118). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 13261342.
Schneider, R. J., Hough, L. M., & Dunnette, M. D. (1996). Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 639655.
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, No. 15-1823 (1st Cir. December 9, 2015).
Tett, R. P., Steele, J. R., & Beauregard, R. S. (2003). Broad and narrow measures on both sides of the personality-job performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 335356.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed