Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Individual Psychological Assessment: The Poster Child of Blended Science and Practice

  • Joy Fisher Hazucha (a1), Anuradha Ramesh (a1), Maynard Goff (a1), Stu Crandell (a1), Charlotte Gerstner (a1), Elaine Sloan (a1), Jurgen Bank (a1) and Paul Van Katwyk (a1)...

Abstract

  • An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided below. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Copyright

Corresponding author

E-mail: joy.hazucha@pdininthhouse.com, Address: PDI Ninth House, 33 South 6th Street, Suite 4900, Minneapolis, MN 55402

References

Hide All
Adverse Impact Analysis of PDI Ninth House Assessments. (2011). Internal technical summary. Minneapolis, MN: Personnel Decisions International.
Connelly, B. S., Ones, D. S., Ramesh, A., & Goff, M. (2008). A pragmatic view of assessment center exercises and dimensions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 121124.
DeCorte, W., Lievens, F., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Combining predictors to achieve optimal trade-offs between selection quality and adverse impact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 13801393.
Dilchert, S., & Ones, D. S. (2009). Assessment center dimensions: Individual differences correlates and meta-analytic incremental validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17, 254270.
Gaugler, B., Rosenthal, D., Thornton, G., & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493511.
Goff, M., & Ramesh, A. (2011). The validity and value of PDI NH assessments 2011. Internal PDI NH white paper. Minneapolis, MN: PDI Ninth House.
Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 1930.
Hausknecht, J., Day, D., & Thomas, S. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639683.
Hermelin, E., Lievens, F., & Robertson, I. T. (2007). The validity of assessment centres for the prediction of supervisory performance ratings: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15, 405411.
Oswald, F. L., & Hough, L. M. (2008). Personality testing and industrial-organizational psychology: A productive exchange and some future directions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 323332.
Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing and higher education. American Psychologist, 56, 302318.
Schmitt, N., & Chan, D. (1998). Personnel selection: A theoretical approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Security and Exchange Commission. (2009, October). Staff Legal Bulletin No. 14E (CF). Retrieved from http://www.sec.gov/interps/legal/cfslb14e.htm.
Silzer, R. & Jeanneret, R. (2011). Individual psychological assessment: A practice and science in search of common ground. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 270296.
Thornton, G. C., & Gibbons, A. M. (2009). Validity of assessment centers for personnel selection. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 169187.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Individual Psychological Assessment: The Poster Child of Blended Science and Practice

  • Joy Fisher Hazucha (a1), Anuradha Ramesh (a1), Maynard Goff (a1), Stu Crandell (a1), Charlotte Gerstner (a1), Elaine Sloan (a1), Jurgen Bank (a1) and Paul Van Katwyk (a1)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.