Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:44:19.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual Psychological Assessment: A Core Competency for Industrial–Organizational Psychology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Richard Jeanneret  and
Rob Silzer
Rob Silzer
Affiliation:
HR Assessment & Development, Inc. and Baruch College, City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Individual Psychological Assessment is widely practiced among I–O psychologists and supported as a core competency by a majority of the commentaries. Our response addresses some of the key points made in the commentaries, such as issues related to the definition, contextual and criterion variables, interpretation and integration methods, validity evidence, professional matters, and future research directions. We also respond to a few critics who want to entirely eliminate expert assessor judgment in IPAs. Models are presented for using assessor judgment and mechanical methods in IPAs and for distinguishing naïve and sophisticated IPA researchers and practitioners. We conclude that IPA is now widely accepted as a core part of I–O psychology.

Type
Response
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 342 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ægisdóttir, S., White, M., Spengler, P., Maugherman, A., Anderson, L., Cook, R., …Rush, J. (2006). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Fifty-six years of accumulated research on clinical versus statistical prediction. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 341–382.Google Scholar
APA Presidential Task Force on Evidence Based Practice. (2006). Evidence based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285. Google Scholar
Briner, R. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (2011). Evidence-based I–O psychology: Not there yet but now a little nearer. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 76–82. Google Scholar
Doverspike, D. (2011). Lessons from the classroom: Teaching an individual psychological assessment course. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 338–341.Google Scholar
Grove, W., Zald, D., Lebow, B., Snitz, B., & Nelson, C. (2000). Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19–30. Google Scholar
Hazucha, J. F., Ramesh, A., Goff, M., Crandell, S., Gerstner, C., Sloan, E., …Van Katwyk, P. (2011). Individual psychological assessment: The poster child of blended science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 297–301.Google Scholar
Holt, R. R. (1958). Clinical and statistical prediction: A reformulation and some new data. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 1–12. Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). (2010). Assessment service delivery—Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings, Part 1: Requirements for service providers. ISO/TC 230 N 116, Geneva Switzerland.Google Scholar
International Task Force on Assessment Center Guidelines. (2000). Guidelines and ethical considerations for assessment center operations. Bridgeville, PA: Development Dimensions International. Google Scholar
Jeanneret, R. (1998). Ethical, legal and professional issues for individual assessment. Individual psychological assessment: Predicting behavior in organizational settings. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
Jeanneret, R., & Silzer, R. (Eds.) (1998). Individual psychological assessment: Predicting behavior in organizational settings. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
Klehe, U.-C. (2011). Scientific principles versus practical realities: Insights from organizational theory to individual psychological assessment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 311–316.Google Scholar
Kuncel, N. R., Highhouse, S. (2011). Complex predictions and assessor mystique. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 302–306.Google Scholar
Laser, S. A. (2011). An iconoclast's view of IPA: What it is and what it is not. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 307–310.Google Scholar
Lowman, R. L. (2011). The question of integration and criteria in individual psychological assessment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 317–321.Google Scholar
McPhail, S. M., & Jeanneret, P. R. (in press). Individual psychological assessment. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personnel selection and assessment. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar
Miguel, R., & Miklos, S. (2011). Individual executive assessment: Sufficient science, standards, and principles. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 330–333.Google Scholar
Morris, S. B., Kwaske, I. H., & Daisley, R. R. (2011). The validity of individual psychological assessments. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 322–326.Google Scholar
Moses, J. (2011). Individual psychological assessment: You pay for what you get. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 334–337.Google Scholar
Roller, R. L., & Morris, S. B. (2008). Meta-analysis of the relationship between individual assessments and job performance. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Silzer, R. F. (1984). Clinical and statistical prediction in a management assessment center. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Silzer, R. F., Cober, R. T., Erickson, A. R., & Robinson, G. (2008). Practitioner needs survey: Final survey report. Society for Industrial–Organizational Psychology, Bowling Green, OH.Google Scholar
Silzer, R., & Jeanneret, R. (2011). Individual psychological assessment: A practice and science in search of common ground. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 270–296.Google Scholar
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP). (1999). Guidelines for education and training at the doctoral level in industrial/organizational psychology. Bowling Green, OH: Author. Google Scholar
Spengler, P., White, M., Ægisdóttir, S., Maugherman, A., Anderson, L., Cook, R., …Rush, J. (2009). The meta-analysis of clinical judgment project: Effects of experience on judgment accuracy. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 350–398. Google Scholar
Tippins, N. T. (2011). What's wrong with content-oriented validity studies for IPAs? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 4, 327–329.Google Scholar