Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ws8qp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T06:15:28.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Journals Can Facilitate the Study of Underlying Situational Characteristics Distinguishing Worker and Professional Samples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2016

Jennifer P. Green*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University
Reeshad S. Dalal
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, George Mason University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Jennifer P. Green, Department of Psychology, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA 22030. E-mail: jgreen24@masonlive.gmu.edu

Extract

Bergman and Jean's (2016) focal article decries the limited research attention of industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists on “workers”—that is, employees such as wage earners, frontline workers, and contractors, who do not fill professional, managerial, or executive positions. We agree. In addition to the scientific and moral benefits of studying workers, there is a practical imperative. An academic discipline that comes across as being disinterested in workers may leave itself open to charges of being the “handmaiden” of management (Hulin, 2002, p. 12). Moreover, such an academic discipline may be ill prepared to provide evidence-based contributions to important societal debates on topics such as income inequality and immigration.

Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergman, M. E., & Jean, V. A. (2016). Where have all the “workers” gone? A critical analysis of the unrepresentativeness of our samples relative to the labor market in the industrial–organizational psychology literature. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 9, 84113.Google Scholar
Chan, D. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 234246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalal, R. S., Bhave, D. P., & Fiset, J. (2014). Within-person variability in job performance: A theoretical review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 40, 13961436.Google Scholar
Garson, J. (1999, December). Where do illegal migrants work? OECD Observer. Retrieved from http://www.oecdobserver.org/news Google Scholar
Ghersi, D., Berlin, J., & Askie, L. (2011). Prospective meta-analysis. In Higgins, J. P. & Green, S. (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Version 5.1.0). Retrieved from http://handbook.cochrane.org/ Google Scholar
Glomb, T. M., Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Rotundo, M. (2004). Emotional labor demands and compensating wage differentials. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 700714.Google Scholar
Green, J. P., Tonidandel, S., & Cortina, J. M. (in press). Getting through the gate: Statistical and methodological issues raised in the reviewing process. Organizational Research Methods.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193206.Google Scholar
Hulin, C. L. (2002). Lessons from industrial and organizational psychology. In Brett, J. M. & Drasgow, F. (Eds.), The psychology of work: Theoretically based empirical research (pp. 322). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kawachi, I., & Kennedy, B. P. (1997). Health and social cohesion: Why care about income inequality? BMJ: British Medical Journal, 314, 10371040.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 9921004.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. W., & Stephens, N. M. (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 642656.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Bonaccio, S. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation into the moderating effects of situational strength on the conscientiousness–performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 10771102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., José, I. J., Hermida, R., Chen, T. R., Vega, R. P., . . . Khare, V. P. (2014). Measuring job-related situational strength and assessing its interactive effects with personality on voluntary work behavior. Journal of Management, 40, 10101041.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80, 252283.Google Scholar
Nadler, J. T., Bartels, L. K., Naumann, S., Morr, R., Locke, J., Beurskens, M., . . . Ginder, M. (2015). Sampling strategies in the top I-O journals: What gets published? The Industrial–Organizational Psychologist, 53, 139147.Google Scholar
Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2015, March). Share of unauthorized immigrant workers in production, construction jobs falls since 2007. Pew Research Center Hispanic Trends. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org Google Scholar
Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. R., Fleishman, E. A., Levin, K. Y., . . . Dye, D. M. (2001). Understanding work using the occupational information network (ONET): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychology, 54, 451492.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1993). Barriers to the advance of organizational science: Paradigm development as a dependent variable. Academy of Management Review, 18, 599620.Google Scholar
Rauthmann, J. F., Gallardo-Pujol, D., Guillaume, E. M., Todd, E., Nave, C. S., Sherman, R. A., . . . Funder, D. C. (2014). The situational eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677718.Google Scholar
Rauthmann, J. F., & Sherman, R. A. (2015). Ultra-brief measures for the situational eight DIAMONDS domains. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000245 Google Scholar
Rogelberg, S. G., Adelman, M., & Askay, D. (2009). Crafting a successful manuscript: Lessons from 131 reviews. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 117121.Google Scholar
Rubin, M., Denson, N., Kilpatrick, S., Matthews, K. E., Stehlik, T., & Zyngier, D. (2014). “I am working-class”: Subjective self-definition as a missing measure of social class and socioeconomic status in higher education research. Educational Researcher, 43, 196200.Google Scholar
Rynes, S. L., Gerhart, B., & Minette, K. A. (2004). The importance of pay in employee motivation: Discrepancies between what people say and what they do. Human Resource Management, 43, 381394.Google Scholar
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 883948). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2002). Self-esteem and socioeconomic status: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 5971.Google Scholar
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2011). Equal employment opportunity instruction booklet (OMB publication No. 3046-0007). Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/employers/eeo1survey/2007instructions.cfm Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Beydoun, M. A. (2007). The obesity epidemic in the United States—Gender, age, socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and geographic characteristics: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29, 628.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. E. (2006). Income inequality and population health: A review and explanation of the evidence. Social Science & Medicine, 62, 17681784.Google Scholar
Xie, J. L., & Johns, G. (1995). Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? Academy of Management Journal, 38, 12881309.Google Scholar