Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T20:47:04.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Comprehensive Approach to Empowering Victims and Understanding Perpetrators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2018

Justina Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Southern New Hampshire University
Tyler M. Pascucci
Affiliation:
Southern New Hampshire University
Michelle Fortin
Affiliation:
Southern New Hampshire University
*
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Justina Oliveira, Southern New Hampshire University, 2500 North River Rd., Manchester, NH 03106. E-mail: j.oliveira@snhu.edu

Extract

We unequivocally agree with the root of Cortina, Rabelo, and Holland's (2018) argument about the danger in focusing mostly on the victim in situations of workplace aggression. Workplace aggression is indeed initiated by the perpetrator (or perpetrators if there are two equally responsible parties in enacting the aggression). Where we believe Cortina et al.’s arguments are lacking is the hard-drawn line that the perpetrator should be the only subject of study. No, the victim should not hold any blame nor insinuations of blame. However, we hold the premise that both sides (i.e., perpetrator and victim) must be considered, and thus both are inherently subjects of interest in order to thoroughly capture the essence of these scenarios. Therefore, our position is that a focus on the victim is not only important, but it is actually an essential component when contemplating workplace aggression. Furthering research in this area will only be successful if we have candid conversations around the inappropriate nature of a solely victim-focused approach to workplace aggression and discuss the explicit differences (or nuanced ones) that may exist across varying perspectives on workplace aggression in order to more fully understand it. Therefore Cortina et al. have rightly initiated an important conversation within industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology.

Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Bradfield, M., & Allen, D. G. (1999). The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Academy of Management Journal, 42 (3), 260272.Google Scholar
Cortina, L. M., Rabelo, V. C., & Holland, K. J. (2018). Beyond blaming the victim: Toward a more progressive understanding of workplace mistreatment. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 11 (1), 81–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. A. B. (2001). The empowerment approach to social work practice: Building the beloved community (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, J. A. B., & Hudson, R. E. (2017). Empowerment approach to social work treatment. In Turner, F. J. (Ed.), Social work treatment: Interlocking theoretical approaches (6th ed., pp. 142165). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness on depression, development and death (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 14421465.Google Scholar
Wallace, C. J., & Johnson, P. D. (2011). Structural and psychological empowerment climates, performance, and the moderating role of shared felt accountability: A managerial perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96 (4), 840850.Google Scholar