Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5959bf8d4d-2zkqf Total loading time: 0.379 Render date: 2022-12-08T21:25:20.489Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Teaching I-O psychology to undergraduate students: Do we practice what we preach?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2021

Lisa M. Kath*
Affiliation:
San Diego State University
Nicholas P. Salter
Affiliation:
Hofstra University
Peter Bachiochi
Affiliation:
Eastern Connecticut State University
Kenneth G. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Iowa
Mikki Hebl
Affiliation:
Rice University
*
*Corresponding author. Emails: lisa.kath@sdsu.edu; kath.lisa@gmail.com

Abstract

As industrial-organizational (I-O) psychologists, we have expertise in applying psychological and/or organizational science to the workplace. However, many of us haven’t taken the time to think about how our I-O psychology knowledge can apply to our teaching practice. We walk through some examples of how I-O psychology research can help us be better teachers, and the goal of our paper is to encourage readers to make evidence-based changes to their teaching based on I-O psychology research. We organize our discussion around four areas: training and development, diversity and inclusion, groups and teams, and leadership. Within each, we offer small, medium, and large changes that could be incorporated into classrooms. We hope that readers will be inspired to build on what they do in their classrooms to help students learn about (and be inspired by) our field.

Type
Focal Article
Copyright
© Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, J. R., McDowell, W. C., & Herdman, A. O. (2014). The effects of a team charter on student team behaviors. Journal of Education for Business, 89, 9097.10.1080/08832323.2013.763753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agirdag, O., Van Avermaet, P., & Van Houtte, M. (2013). School segregation and math achievement: A mixed-method study on the role of self-fulfilling prophecies. Teachers College Record, 115, 150.Google Scholar
American Psychological Association (2013). APA guidelines for the undergraduate psychology major. http://www.apa.org/ed/precollege/about/psymajor-guidelines.pdf Google Scholar
Balwant, P. T. (2016). Transformational instructor-leadership in higher education: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Leadership Studies, 9, 2042.10.1002/jls.21423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. The Free Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. (2002). Becoming an ally: Breaking the cycle of oppression in people. Zed Books.Google Scholar
Boser, J., Scherer, S., Kuchta, K., Franziska, S., Wenzel, C., & Horz, H. (2017). Empirically founded teaching in psychology—an example for the combination of evidence-based teaching and the scholarship of teaching and learning. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 16, 261275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Chisholm, I. M. (1994). Preparing teachers for multicultural classrooms. Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 14, 4368.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, F. (2019). Application of rubrics in the classroom: A vital tool for improvement in assessment, feedback and learning. International Education Studies, 12(1), 6168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. C., & Chlup, D. T. (2014). Criticality in practice: The cyclical development process of social justice allies at work. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 16(4), 481498.10.1177/1523422314544295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennehy, T. C., Smith, J. S., Moore, C., & Dasgupta, N. (2018). Stereotype threat and stereotype inoculation for underrepresented students in the first year of college. In Feldman, R. S. (Ed.), The first year of college: Research, theory, and practice on improving the student experience and increasing retention (pp. 309344). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeShon, R. P., & Gillispie, J. Z. (2005). A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 10961127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dommeyer, C. J. (2012). A new strategy for dealing with social loafers on the group project: The segment manager method. Journal of Marketing Education, 34, 113127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferdman, B. M. (2013). The practice of inclusion in diverse organizations. In Ferdman, Bernardo M. & Deane, Barbara R. (Eds.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion (pp. 354). John Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118764282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 84108415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ford, J. D., & Ford, L. W. (2010). Stop blaming resistance to change and start using it. Organizational Dynamics, 39(1), 2436.10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goltz, S. M., Hietapelto, A. B., Reinsch, R. W., & Tyrell, S. K. (2008). Teaching teamwork and problem solving concurrently. Journal of Management Education, 32(5), 541562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-Based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level, multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzanka, P. R., Adler, J., & Blazer, J. (2015). Making up allies: The identity choreography of straight LGBT activism. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12, 165181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurung, R. A. R. (2015). Conducting and applying the scholarship of teaching and learning. In Dunn, D. S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of undergraduate psychology education (pp. 187197). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 10291045.10.5465/3069328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hentschel, T., Shemla, M., Wegge, J., & Kearney, E. (2013). Perceived diversity and team functioning: The role of diversity beliefs and affect. Small Group Research, 44, 3361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermann, A. D., Foster, D. A., & Hardin, E. E. (2010). Does the first week of class matter? A quasi-experimental investigation of student satisfaction. Teaching of Psychology, 37, 7984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, H. D., Richmond, A. S., & Fleck, B. (2015). A primer for creating a flipped psychology course. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 14(2), 169185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irons, J. G. (2013). That’s an empirical question … The scholarship of teaching and learning. In Keeley, J., Afful, S. E., Stiegler-Balfour, J. J., Good, J. J., & Leder, S. (Eds.), So you landed a job—What’s next? Advice for early career psychologists from early career psychologists (pp. 5464). Society for the Teaching of Psychology.Google Scholar
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. III F, & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development, 8th ed. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2013). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Schmitt, N. W., Highhouse, S., & Weiner, I. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 412469). John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Gully, S. M., Brown, K. G., Salas, E., Smith, E. M., & Nason, E. R. (2001). Effects of training goals and goal orientation traits on multidimensional training outcomes and performance adaptability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85, 131.10.1006/obhd.2000.2930CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41, 212218.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantos, G. P. (1997). Motivating students: The attitude of the professor. Marketing Education Review, 7, 2738.10.1080/10528008.1997.11488588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latane, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822832.10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liden, R. C., Wayne, W. J., Jaworksi, R. A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30, 285304.10.1016/j.jm.2003.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longmire, N. H., & Harrison, D. A. (2018). Seeing their side versus feeling their pain: Differential consequences of perspective-taking and empathy at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 894915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathieu, J. E., & Rapp, T. (2009). Laying the successful foundation for teamwork. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 90103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, R. P., McGurk, D., Effland, V. S., Johll, N. L., & Harding, D. J. (2004). Brainstorming and task performance in groups constrained by evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 93, 7587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noe, R. A. (2017). Employee training and development (7th ed). McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Woehr, D. J., Bullard, L. G., Felder, R. M., Finelli, C. J., Layton, R. A., Pomeranz, H. R., & Schmucker, D. G. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self-and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 609630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N. J., & Carpenter, S. K. (2007). Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 187193.10.3758/BF03194050CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pew Research Center. (2019). 6 demographic trends shaping the U.S. and the world in 2019. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/11/6-demographic-trends-shaping-the-u-s-and-the-world-in-2019/ Google Scholar
Richmond, A. S., Morgan, R. K., Slattery, J. M., Mitchell, N. G., & Cooper, A. G. (2019). Project syllabus: An exploratory study of learner-centered syllabi. Teaching of Psychology, 46, 615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H., & Karpicke, J. (2006). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249255.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom. Urban Review, 3, 1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, G. M., & Bohan, J. S. (2016). Institutional allyship for LGBT equality: Underlying processes and potentials for change. Journal of Social Issues, 72, 335354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 74101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slavich, G. M., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2012). Transformational teaching: Theoretical underpinnings, basic principles, and core methods. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 569608.10.1007/s10648-012-9199-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Inc. (2016). Guidelines for education and training in industrial/organizational psychology. https://www.siop.org/Events-Education/Graduate-Training-Program/Guidelines-for-Education-and-Training Google Scholar
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797811. 10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stewart, G. L., & Brown, K. G. (2015). Human resource management: Linking strategy to practice (3rd ed.). Wiley.Google Scholar
Sue, D. W. (2017). The challenges of becoming a White ally. Counseling Psychologist, 45(5), 706716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandewalle, D., Nerstad, C., & Dysvik, A. (2019). Goal orientation: A review of the miles traveled and the miles to go. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 115144.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vázquez-García, M. (2018). Collaborative-Group testing improves learning and knowledge retention of human physiology topics in second-year medical students. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(2), 232239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vogler, J. S., & Robinson, D. H. (2016). Team-Based testing improves individual learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 84, 787803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, X., Liu, Y., & Chen, S. (2015). A meta-analysis of the relationship between team demographic diversity and team performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47, 11721187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. https://www.sabes.org/sites/sabes.org/files/resources/Backward_design.pdf.Google Scholar
Wiggins, S., Chiriac, E. H., Abbad, G. L., Pauli, R., & Worrell, M. (2016). Ask not only “What can problem-based learning do for psychology?” but “What can psychology do for problem-based learning?” A review of the relevance of problem-based learning for psychology teaching and research. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 15, 136154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, D. (2004). Improving race relations in higher education: The jigsaw classroom as a missing piece to the puzzle. Urban Education, 39, 316344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. H., & Wilson, S. B. (2007). The first day of class affects student motivation: An experimental study. Teaching of Psychology, 34, 226230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoder, J. D., & Hochevar, C. M. (2005). Encouraging active learning can improve students’ performance on examinations. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 9195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Teaching I-O psychology to undergraduate students: Do we practice what we preach?
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Teaching I-O psychology to undergraduate students: Do we practice what we preach?
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Teaching I-O psychology to undergraduate students: Do we practice what we preach?
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *