Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T13:32:27.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Care About Gender?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Ann Garry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I address motivations that feminist philosophers have for being concerned about the “maleness” of philosophy and the “problem of difference” within feminist theory. An appropriate motivation for caring about both sets of issues is the desire not to oppress others. In order to be able to understand this motivation and to act on it, we need to retain gender as an analytical category.

Type
Symposium on Susan Bordo's “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy”
Information
Hypatia , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Summer 1992 , pp. 155 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1988. Feminist scepticism and the ‘maleness’ of philosophy. Journal of Philosophy 85(11): 619–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1990. Feminism, postmodernism, and gender‐scepticism. In Feminism/post‐modernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Card, Claudia. 1991. Feminist ethics. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dinnerstein, Dorothy. 1977. The mermaid and the minotaur. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane, 1983. Political philosophy and the patriarchal unconscious: A psychological perspective on epistemology and metaphysics. In Discovering reality, ed. Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1990. Thinking fragments: Psychoanalysis, feminism, and postmodernism in the contemporary west. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Phibsophy and feminist thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1991. Feminist ethics: Projects, problems, prospects. In Feminist ethics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Lorde, Audre. 1981. The master's tools will never dismantle the master's house. In This bridge called my back, ed. Moraga, Cherrie and Anzaldúa, Gloria. New York: Kitchen Table Press.Google Scholar
Lugones, María and Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1983. Have we got a theory for you Feminist theory, cultural imperialism and the demand for ‘the woman's voice.’Hypatia a Special Issue of Women's Studies International Forum 6: 573–81.Google Scholar
Lugones, María and Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1991. On the logic of pluralist feminism. In Feminist ethics, ed. Card, Claudia. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda. 1990. Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheman, Naomi. 1990. The unavoidability of gender. Journal of Social Phibsophy 21: 34–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1958. Phibsophical investigations, 3d ed., trans. Anscombe, G.E.M.New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar