Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T10:45:44.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflections on Feminist Scepticism, The “Maleness” of Philosophy and Postmodernism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Abstract

Bordo is concerned with what she calls apostmodem “theoretics of heterogeneity” that questions the validity of historical and cultural analyses “along gender-tines.” It also challenges the validity of feminist analyses concerning the “maleness” of philosophy. Not surprisingly, this has precipitated debate between postmodernists and those alarmed by its implications for feminist work. At issue is the epistemological and political capacity of feminism to analyze social power and dominance through an analysis of gender.1

Type
Symposium on Susan Bordo's “Feminist Skepticism and the ‘Maleness’ of Philosophy”
Copyright
Copyright © 1992 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bordo, Susan. 1987. The flight to objectivity: Essays in Cartesianism and culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1988. Skepticism and the ‘maleness’ of philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy 85(11): 619–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordo, Susan. 1990. Feminism, postmodernism and gender‐scepticism. In Feminism/post‐modernism, ed. Nicholson, Linda. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1991, What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Philosophy and feminist thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda ed., 1990. Feminism/postmodernism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. 1988. Gender and the politics of history. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar