Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T11:58:02.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Politics of Women's Studies and Men's Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Mary Libertin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is a response to the problematic relation between men's studies and women's studies; it is also a particular response to Harry Brod's discussion of the theoretical need for men's studies programs in his article “The New Men's Studies: From Feminist Theory to Gender Scholarship.” The paper argues that a male feminist would be more effective in a women's studies program, that the latter already includes research about the experiences of both males and females. Although future research on both genders is needed, the paper argues that there does not currently exist a gap in theory or in practice in women's studies programs, as Brod claims. The paper argues in favor of both men and women working together to strengthen and broaden women's studies programs in existence and encourages the creation of more programs and more study of gender issues.

Type
Comment/Reply
Information
Hypatia , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Summer 1987 , pp. 143 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardener, Edwin. 1977. Belief and the problem of women. In Perceiving women, ed. Ardener, Shirley. New York: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1984. France: Feminism–Alive, well, and in constant danger. In Sisterhood is global, ed. and compiled by Morgan, Robin. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Brod, Harry. 1987. The new men's studies: From feminist theory to gender scholarship. Hypatia 2 (1): 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cixous, Héléne and Clément, Catherine. 1986. La Jeune Née, 1975. The newly born woman. Trans. Wing, Betsy, forward by Gilbert, Sandra M.Theory and History of Literature, vol. 24. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. 1983. Feminist politics and human nature. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. [1870] 1984. Description of a notation for the logic of relatives. In Memoirs of the American academy, vol. 9 pp. 317–78. Reprinted in Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition: Volume 2, 1867‐1871, eds. Edward C. Moore, et. al. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Showalter, Elaine. 1981. Feminist criticism in the wilderness. Critical Inquiry (Winter): 197–205.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan Rubin. 1985. (Re)writing the body: The politics and poetics of female eroticism. Poetics Today 6 (1‐2): 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vance, Carole and Snitow, Ann. 1984. Toward a conversation about sex in feminism: A modest proposal. Signs 10 (Autumn): 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar