Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T05:32:29.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Politics of Enlarged Mentality: Hannah Arendt, Citizenship Responsibility, and Feminism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Patricia Moynagh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Drawing from four Arenaaan themes—plurality, the public realm, power, and perspective appreciation—I argue for citizenship as a “politics of enlarged mentality.” This term suggests an alternative conception of citizenship that surpasses the limits of both the liberal and civic republican traditions. Unlike die masculinized liberal ideal of the citizen and contrary to the gendered universality that defines the civic republican traditions, a politics based on enlarged mentality combines context sensitivity with principled judgments.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 12 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Citizenship in Feminism: Identity, Action, and Locale , Fall 1997 , pp. 27 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackelsberg, Martha A. and Shanely, Mary Lyndon. 1996. Privacy, publicity, and power a feminist rethinking of the public‐private distinction. In Rewsionmg the political: Feminist reconstructions of traditional concepts in western political theory, Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Stefano, Christine Di, eds. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. Basic moral propositions. University of Chicago Hannah Arendt Papers, Library of Congress, Container 40, p. 024648.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1958. The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1968. Between past and future: Eight exercises in political thought. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1982. Lectures on Kant's political philosophy, ed.Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah 1992. Karl jaspers correspondence 1926‐1969, ed.Kohler, Lotte and Saner, Hans. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1941. Nicomachean ethics. In The basic works of Aristotle, ed.McKeon, Richard. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald. 1995. Why citizenship constitutes a theoretical problem in the last decade of the twentieth century. In Theorizing, Citizenship ed.Beiner, Ronald. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Beiner, Ronald 1982. Interpretive essay. In Hannah Arendt, Lectures on Kant's political philosophy, ed.Beiner, Ronald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. The reluctant modernism of Hannah Arendt. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla 1992. Situating the self: Gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla 1990. Communicative ethics and current controversies in practical philosophy. In The communicative ethics controversy, ed.Benhabib, Seyla and Dallmayr, Fred. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla 1986. Critique, norm, and Utopia: A study of the foundations of critical theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bickford, Susan. 1996. The dissonance of democracy: Listening, conflict, and citizenship. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith and Scott, Joan W., eds. 1992. Feminist theorize the political. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary G. 1991. Hannah Arendt and feminist politics. In Feminist interpretations and political theory, ed.Shanely, Mary Lyndon and Pateman, Carole. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Disch, Lisa Jane. 1994. Hannah Arendt and the limits of philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1991. Public man, private women: Women in social and political thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1991. What's critical about critical theory? The case of Habermas and gender. In Feminist interpretations and political theory, ed.Shanley, Mary Lyndon and Pateman, Carole. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The theory of communicative action Jifeworld and system: A critique of functionalism reason, Vol. Two. Trans., Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1984. The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society, Vol. One. Trans., Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie, ed. 1995. Feminist interpretations of Hannah Arendt. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Honig, Bonnie ed, 1993. Political theory and the displacement of politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991. The critique of judgment. Trans., Creed, James. Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1976. Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive‐developmental approach. In Mora! development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues, ed.Lickona, T.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1978a. Contribution to the critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right: Introduction. In The Marx‐Engels reader, ed.Tucker, Robert C.New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1978b. On the Jewish question. In The Marx‐Engels reader, ed.Tucker, Robert C.New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Mead, George Herbert. 1962. Mind, self, & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Vol. 1, works of George Herbert Mead, ed.Morris, Charles W. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moraga, Cherrie and Anzaldua, Gloria, eds. 1993. This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Linda, ed. 1995. Feminist contentions: A philosophical exchange. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan. 1989. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Paton, H. J. 1948. The categorical imperative: A study in Kant's moralphihsophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1984. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1979. On lies, secrets, andsiknce: Sehctedprose 1966‐1978. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick. 1987. Hannah Arendt on Kant, truth and politics. Political Studies 35: 379–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Iris. 1995. Polity and group difference: A critique of the ideal of universal citizenship. In Ronald Beiner, Theorizing Citizenship, ed.Beiner, Ronald. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference‐ Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar