Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T17:28:47.250Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Mere Switch or a Fundamental Change? Theorizing Transgender Marriage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Abstract

Focusing on the legal cases that have been litigated in the United States, and making references to popular culture, this article considers whether marriages in which one of the partners is transgendered necessarily challenge or necessarily reinforce heterosexual hegemony.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bohjalian, Chris. 2000. Trans‐sister radio. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Coombs, Mary. 1998. Sexual dis‐orientation: Transgendered people and same‐sex marriage. UCLA 32 8: 219–66.Google Scholar
Frye, Phyllis Randolph, and Meiselman, Alyson Dodi. 2001. Same‐sex marriages have existed in the United States for a long time now. 32 64: 1031–71.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Julie. 2000. When is a man a man, and when is a woman a woman? 32 52: 745–68.Google Scholar
Robson, Ruthann. 1998. Sappho goes to law school. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Robson, Ruthann. 2002. Assimilation, marriage, and lesbian liberation. 32 75: 709819.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Andrew N. 2002. Transgender jurisprudence: Dysphoric bodies of law. London, Sydney: Cavendish Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Michael ed. 1993. Introduction. In Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Wilgoren, Jodi. 2002. Suit over estate claims a widow is not a woman. New York Times (January 13): 18.Google Scholar