Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-25T12:20:25.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gloria Anzaldúa's Affective Logic of Volverse Una

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Cynthia M. Paccacerqua
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although Gloria Anzaldúa's critical categories have steadily entered discussions in the field of philosophy, a lingering skepticism remains about her works’ ability to transcend the particularity of her lived experience. In an effort to respond to this attitude, I make Anzaldúa's corpus the center of philosophical analysis and posit that immanent to this work is a logic that lends it the unity of a critical philosophy that accounts for its concrete, multilayered character and shifting, creative force. I call this an “affective logic of volverse una.” Starting with the understanding of a situated modality of all subjectivity, Anzaldúa's work exhibits a logic of three moments distinguished by states of awareness. Each state of awareness is characterized by the generative degree of the subject's responses to its conditions: critical, individuating, and expansive. Led by her late concepts of conocimiento and nepantlera, I return to her earlier works and trace Anzaldúa's innovative exploration of undoing the oppressive condition of marginal subjectivities from “La Prieta” through Borderlands/La Frontera to her final published essay “now let us shift.” I find a liberatory schema of volverse una/becoming whole that is grounded in an active receptivity of sensibility and facilitated by affective technologies for transformation.

Type
Cluster on Latina Feminism
Information
Hypatia , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , Spring 2016 , pp. 334 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarcón, Norma. 1994. The theoretical subject(s) of This bridge called my back and Anglo‐American feminism. In The postmodern turn: New perspectives on social theory, ed. Seidman, Steven. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda. 2006. The unassimilated theorist. PMLA 121 (1): 255–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, Stephanie, and Paccacerqua, Cynthia. 2013. De conciencia mestiza a conocimiento. La evolución teorética fronteriza chicana de Gloria Anzaldúa. In Noticias del deluvio: Textos latinoamericanos de las últimas décadas, ed. Marinone, Mónica and Tineo, Gabriela. Mar del Plata, Argentina: EUDEM.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1981a. La Prieta. In This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color, ed. Moraga, Cherríe and Anzaldúa, Gloria. Watertown, Mass.: Persephone Press.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1981b. Speaking in tongues: A letter to third world women writers. In This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color, ed. Moraga, Cherríe and Anzaldúa, Gloria. Watertown, Mass.: Persephone Press.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 2002. now let us shift… the path of conocimiento… inner works, public acts. In This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation, ed. Anzaldúa, Gloria and Keating, AnaLouise. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Undoing gender. Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2005. Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cantú, Norma. 2011. Doing work that matters: The impact of Gloria Anzaldúa's Borderlands/La frontera. BROCAR 35: 109–16.Google Scholar
Capetillo‐Ponce, Jorge. 2011. On borderlands and bridges: An inquiry into Gloria Anzaldúa's methodology. In Bridging: How Gloria Anzaldúa's life and work transformed our own, ed. Keating, AnaLouise and González‐López, Gloria. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Curry, Tommy J. 2011. On derelict and method: The methodological crisis of African‐American philosophy's study of African‐descended peoples under an integrationist milieu. Radical Philosophy Review 14 (2): 139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgadillo, Teresa. 2011. Spiritual mestizaje. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2014. How feminism became capitalism's handmaiden–and how to reclaim it. The Guardian. October 13.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth. 2011. Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics, and art. Durham, N.C., and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hames‐García, Michael. 2011. Queer theory revisited. In Gay Latino studies, ed. Hames‐Gracia, Michael and Martínez, Ernesto. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, Aída, and Paccacerqua, Cynthia. 2015. Not all clarities are created equal: The politics of “opaqueness.” Hypatia 30 (3): 620–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1781/1999. Critique of pure reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, AnaLouise, and López, Gloria González, eds. 2011. Bridging: How Gloria Anzaldúa's life and work transformed our own. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Keating, AnaLouise, ed.2005. EntreMundos/AmongWorlds: New perspectives on Gloria Anzaldúa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, AnaLouise, ed.2006. From borderlands and new mestizas to nepantla and nepantleras: Anzaldúan theories for social change. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self‐Knowledge 4 (3): 5–16.Google Scholar
Keating, AnaLouise, ed.2014. Mesoamerican mythmaking as queer(ed) visionary hermeneutics. In The Cambridge history of gay and lesbian literature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lugones, María. 2005. From withing germinative stasis: Creating active subjectivity, resistant agency. In EntreMundos/AmongWorlds: New perspectives on Gloria Anzaldúa, ed. Keating, AnaLouise. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2007. Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia 22 (1): 186–209.Google Scholar
Lugones, María. 2011. It's all in having a history. In Gay Latino studies: A critical reader, ed. Hames‐García, Michael and Martínez, Ernesto Javier. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mignolo, Walter. 2000. Local histories and global designs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Montejano, David. 1987. Anglos and Mexicans in the making of Texas, 1836–1986. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Moraga, Cherríe. 2011. A Xicana codex of changing consciousness: Writings, 2000–2010. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moya, Paula M. L. 2002. Learning from experience: Minority identities, multicultural struggles. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2003. Being lovingly, knowingly ignorant: White feminism and women of color. Hypatia 21 (3): 56–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, Mariana. 2008. Wounds of self: Experience, words, image, and identity. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 22 (4): 235–47.Google Scholar
Ortíz, Fernando. 1995. Cuban counterpoint: Tobacco and sugar. Trans. Harriet de Onís. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Pérez, Laura E. 2010. Enrique Dussel's ética de la liberación, U.S. women of color decolonizing practices, and coalitionary politics amidst difference. Qui‐Parle 18 (2): 121–46.Google Scholar
Quijano, Aníbal. 2008. Coloniality of power, eurocentrism, and social classification. In Coloniality at large: Latin America and the postcolonial debate. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar