Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:14:49.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender, Development, and Post-Enlightenment Philosophies of Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Sandra Harding
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent “gender, environment, and sustainable development” accounts raise pointed questions about the complicity of Enlightenment philosophies of science with failures of Third World development policies and the current environmental crisis. The strengths of these analyses come from distinctive ways they link androcentric, economistic, and nature-blind aspects of development thinking to “the Enlightenment dream.” In doing so they share perspectives with and provide resources for other influential schools of science studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 13 , Issue 3: Special Issue: Border Crossings: Multiculturalism and Postcolonial Challenges, Part 2 , Summer 1998 , pp. 146 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adas, Michael. 1989. Machines as the measure of man. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Agarwal, Bina. 1993. The gender and environment debate: lessons from India. Feminist Studies 18(1).Google Scholar
Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera. San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.Google Scholar
Barker, Drucilla. 1998. Dualisms, discourse, and development. Hypatia 13(3)xxxx.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bass, Thomas A. 1990. Camping with the prince, and other tales of science in Africa. Boston :.Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Blaut, J. M. 1993. The colonizer's model of the World: Geographical diffusionism and Eurocentric history. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Boserup, Ester. 1970. Women's role in economic development. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Braidotti, Rosi, Charkiewicz, Ewa, Hausler, Sabine, and Saskia, Wieringa. 1994. Women, the environment, and sustainable development: Towards a theoretical synthesis. London: Zed Books/INSTRAW.Google Scholar
Brockway, Lucille H. 1979. Science and colonial expansion: The of the British Royal Botanical Gardens. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1991. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Crosby, Alfred. 1987. Ecological imperialism: The biological expansion of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dankelman, Irene, and Joan, Davidson. 1988. Women and environment in the Third World. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Dupre, John. 1993. The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations for the disunity of science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Ann. 1998. Resisting the veil of privilege: Building bridge identities as an ethico‐politics of global feminisms. Hypatia 13(3)xxxx.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forman, Paul. 1987. Beyond quantum electronics: National security as a basis for physical research in the U.S., 1940–1960. Historical Studies in Physical and Biological Sciences 18.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter, and Stump, David J., eds. 1996. The disunity of science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goonatilake, Susantha. 1984. Aborted discovery: Science and creativity in the Third World. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Goonatilake, Susantha. 1997. Mining civilizational knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1989. Primate visions: Gender, race and nature in the world of modem science. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1997. Modest witness@Second_millennium.FemaleMan meets_onco‐mouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Wendy, ed. 1994. Feminist perspectives on sustainable development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1986. The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose science? Whose knowledge??Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1992. After the neutrality ideal: Science, politics and “strong objectivity.” Social Research 59: 567–87; reprinted in The politics of Western science, 1640‐1990, ed. Margaret C. Jacobs. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra ed. 1993. The “racial” economy of science: Toward a democratic future. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1994. Is science multicultural? Challenges, resources, opportunities, uncertainties. Configurations 2(2) and in Multiculturalism: A reader, ed. Theo Goldberg, David. London: Blackwell's, 1994.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1995. “Strong Objectivity”: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese 104(3): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1996. Multicultural and global feminist philosophies of science: Resources and challenges. Feminism, sciences, and the philosophy of science, ed. Hankinson Nelson, Lynn and Nelson, Jack. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1997. Women's standpoints on nature: What makes them possible? Osiris 12. Special issue on Women, Gender, and Science, ed. Longino, Helen and Gregory Kohlstedt, Sally.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1998a. Is science multicultural? Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1998b. Is modern science an ethnoscience?Sociology of the sciences yearbook: Science and technology in a developing world, eds. Shinn, Terry, Spaapen, Jack, and Waast, Raoul. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Headrick, Daniel R., ed. 1981. The tools of empire: Technology and European imperialism in the nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hess, David J. 1995. Science and technology in a multicultural world. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly‐Gadol, Joan 1976. The social relations of the sexes: Methodological implications of women's history. Signs 1(4): 809–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettel, Bonnie. 1995. Key paths for science and technology. Missing links: Gender equity in science and technology for development, ed. Gender Working Group, U.N. Commission on Science and Technology for Development. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Kochhar, R. K. 199293. Science in British India. Current Science (Delhi, India). Part I, 63(11): 689–94; Part II, 64(1): 55‐62.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970 [1962]. The structure of scientific revolutions, 2d ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, Deepak. 1991. Science and empire: Essays in Indian context (1700‐1947). Delhi: Anamika Prakashan/National Institute of Science, Technology and Development.Google Scholar
Lach, Donald F. 1977. Asia in the making of Europe, Vol. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McClellan, James E. 1992. Colonialism and science: Saint Domingue in the Old Regime. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mies, Maria. 1986. Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labor. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Nandy, Ashis, ed. 1990. Science, hegemony andviolence: A requiem for modernity. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph. 1954ff Science and civilisation in China (7 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, Joseph. 1969. The grand titration: Science and society in East and West. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Oyewumi, Oyeronke. 1997. The invention of women: Making an African sense of Western gender discourses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Petitjean, Patrick, Moulton, Jami, et al., eds. 1992. Science and empires: Historical studies about scientific development and European expansion. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Andrew, ed. 1992. Science as practice and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the mastery of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Proctor, Robert. 1991. Value‐free science? Purity and power in modem knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reingold, Nathan and Rothenberg, Marc, eds. 1987. Scientific colonialism: Cross‐cultural comparisons. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Rodney, Walter. 1982. How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Washington DC: Howard University Press.Google Scholar
Sardar, Ziauddin, ed. 1988. The revenge of Athena: Science, exploitation and the Third World. London: Mansell.Google Scholar
Schuster, John A., and Yeo, Richard R., eds. 1986. The politics and rhetoric of scientific method: Historical studies. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seager, Joni. 1993. Earth follies: Coming to feminist terms with the global environmental crisis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sen, Gita and Caren, Grown. 1987. Development crises and alternative visions: Third World women's perspectives. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1994. A social history of truth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapin, Steven. and Simon, Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the air pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. 1989. Stauying alive: Women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Sparr, Pamela, ed. 1994. Mortgaging women's lives: Feminist critiques of structural adjustment. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Watson‐Verran, Helen, and David, Turnbull. 1995. Science and other indigenous knowledge systems. In Handbook of science and technology studies, ed. Jasanoff, Sheila, Markle, George, Pinch, Trevor, and Petersen, James. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. p. 115–139.Google Scholar
Weatherford, Jack. 1988. Indian givers: What the Native Americans gave to the world. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. 1969. Giordano Bruno and the hermetic tradition. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar