Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T09:39:43.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feminist Art and the Political Imagination

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Amy Mullin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Activist and political art works, particularly feminist ones, are frequently either dis-missed for their illegitimate combination of the aesthetic and the political, or embraced as chiefly political works. Flawed conceptions of politics and the imagination are responsible for that dismissal. An understanding of the imagination is developed that allows us to see how political work and political explorations may inform the artistic imagination.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 18 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Women, Art, and Aesthetics , Fall Winter 2003 , pp. 189 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adorno, Theodor W. 1982a. Commitment. In The essential Frankfurt school reader, ed. Arato, Andrew and Gebhardt, Eike. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 1982b On the fetish character in music and the regression in listening. In The essential Frankfurt school reader, ed. Arato, Andrew and Gebhardt, Eike. NewYork: Continuum.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 1984. Aesthetic theory, Trans. Lenhardt, C. ed. Adorno, Gretel and Tiedemann, Rolf. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 1992. Charmed language. In Notes to literature, vol. 2. Trans. Nicholson, Shierry Weber. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Avkigos, Jan. 1995. Group Material timeline: activism as a work of art. In But is it art: The spirit of art as activism, ed. Felshin, Nina. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Bender, Gretchen. 1991. Artistapos;s interview. In Breakthroughs: avant‐garde artists in Europe and America, 1959–1990, ed. Howell, John. New York: Rizzoli International Publications.Google Scholar
Border Art Workshop. 1992. Interview. In Contemporary art and multicultural education, ed. Cahan, Susan and Kocur, Zoya. New York: The New Museum of Contemporary Art.Google Scholar
Brand, Peg Zeglin. 2000. Glaring omissions in traditional theories of art. In Theories of art today, ed. Carroll, Noel. Madison, Wisc: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Brustein, Robert. 1995. Cultural politics and coercive philanthropy. Partisan Review 62 (2): 251–58.Google Scholar
Cleveland, William. 1992. Art in other places: artists at work in Americaapos;s community and social institutions. Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishing.Google Scholar
Cohen‐Cruz, Jan. 1995. The American Festival Project: performing difference, discovering common ground. In But is it art? The spirit of art as activism, ed. Felshin, Nina. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Condé, Carol and Beveridge, Karl. 1995. Telling stories: Some thoughts on art and the labour movement. In Questions of community, ed. Augaitis, Daina, Falk, Lome, Gilbert, Sylvie, Anne Moser, Mary. Banff: Banff Centre Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, Elizam. 1994. The heuristic power of art. In The subversive imagination, ed. Becker, Carol. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Felshin, Nina. 1995. Introduction. In But is it art? The spirit of art as activism, ed. Felshin, Nina. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Felski, Rita. 1995. Why feminism doesnapos;t need an aesthetic (and why it canapos;t ignore aesthetics). In Feminism and tradition in aesthetics, ed. Brand, Peggy Z. and Korsmeyer, Carolyn. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Freire, Paolo. 1986. Pedagogy of the oppressed. Trans. Ramos, Myra Bergman. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Goehr, Lydia. 1994. Political music and the politics of music. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 52 (1): 99–112.10.2307/431589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez‐Peña, Guillermo. 1994. The free art agreement. In The subversive imagination, ed. Becker, Carol. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grosz, George, and Herzfeld, Wieland. 1992. Art is in danger. In Art in theory, ed. Harrison, Charles and Wood, Paul. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Group Material. 1992. Interview. In Contemporary art and multicultural education, ed. Cahan, Susan and Kocur, Zoya. New York: The New Museum of Contemporary Art.Google Scholar
Harrison, Bernard. 1991. Inconvenient fictions: literature and the limits of theory. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctt211qwk5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepworth, Barbara. 1992. Sculpture. In Art in theory, ed. Harrison, Charles and Wood, Paul. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell. 1995. Art on my mind: Visual politics. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Homey, Karen 1945. Our inner conflicts. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Hospers, John. 1982. Understanding the arts. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice‐Hall.Google Scholar
James, William. 1950. The principles of psychology. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1951. Critique of judgment. Trans. Bernard, J.H.New York: Hafner Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Jeff. 1995. The body politics of Suzanne Lacy. In But is it art? The spirit of art as activism, ed. Felshin, Nina. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Kruger, Barbara. 1991. Artistapos;s Interview. In Breakthroughs: avant‐garde artists in Europe and America, 1959–1990, ed. Howell, John. New York: Rizzoli International Publications.Google Scholar
Kuspit, Donald. 1993a. Crowding the picture: Notes on American activist art today. In Art in the public interest, ed. Raven, Arlene. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
Kuspit, Donald. 1993b. The cult of the avant‐garde artist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Lauretis, Teresa. 1990. Rethinking womenapos;s cinema: Aesthetics and feminist theory. In Issues in feminist film criticism, ed. Erens, Patricia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lauter, Estella. 1990. Re‐enfranchising art: Feminist interventions in the theory of art. Hypatia 5 (2): 21–34.10.1111/j.1527-2001.1990.tb00419.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippard, Lucy R. 1984. Trojan horses: activist art and power. In Art after modernism: rethinking representation, ed. Wallis, Brian. New York: The New Museum of Contemporary Art.Google Scholar
Lippard, Lucy R. 1991. Intruders. In Breakthroughs: avant‐garde artists in Europe and America, 1959–1990, ed. Howell, John. New York: Rizzoli International Publications.Google Scholar
Georg, Lukaçs. 1992. ‘Tendency’ or Partisanship. In Art in theory, ed. Harrison, Charles and Wood, Paul. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marcus, Laura. 1992. Feminist aesthetics and the new realism. In New feminist discourses, ed. Armstrong, Isobel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mathews, Sabrina. 1995. Creating conversations. In Questions of community, ed. Augaitis, Diana, Falk, Lorne, Gilbert, Sylvie, Anne Moser, Mary. Banff, Alberta: Banff Centre Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, William. 1987. Interview. In Expressively black, ed. Gay, Geneva and Barber, Willie L.New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Mays, John Bentley. 1994. The Winsor posture. Canadian Art 2 (3): 112–17.Google Scholar
Meyer, Richard. 1995. This is to enrage you: Gran Fury and the graphics of AIDS activism. In But is it art? The spirit of art as activism, ed. Felshin, Nina. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Min, Yong Soon. 1992. Interview. In Contemporary art and multicultural education, ed. Cahan, Susan and Kocur, Zoya. New York: The New Museum of Contemporary Art.Google Scholar
Mullin, Amy. 2000. Adorno, art theory, and feminist practice. Philosophy Today 44 (1): 16–30.10.5840/philtoday200044150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndebele, Njabulo S. 1984. Turkish tales and some thoughts on South African fiction. Staffrider 6 (1): 20–38.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1998. Exactly and responsibly: A defense of ethical criticism. Philosophy and Literature 22 (2): 343–365.10.1353/phl.1998.0047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oapos;Grady, Lorraine. 1992. Interview. In Contemporary art and multicultural education, ed. Cahan, Susan and Kocur, Zoya. New York: The New Museum of Contemporary Art.Google Scholar
van Peer, Willie. 1995. The historical non‐triviality of art: A rejoinder to Jerome Stolnitz. British Journal of Aesthetics 3 (2): 168–72.Google Scholar
Phillips, Patricia C. 1995. Peggy Diggs: private acts and public art. In But is it art? The spirit of art as activism, ed. Felshin, Nina. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Plato 1964. The collected dialogues, ed. Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntington. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, B. Ruby. 1990. In the name of feminist film criticism. In Issues in feminist film criticism, ed. Erens, Patricia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rich, B. Ruby. 1994. Dissed and disconnected: notes on present ills and future dreams. In The subversive imagination, ed. Becker, Carol. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rivera, Diego. 1992. The revolutionary spirit in modern art. In Art in theory, ed. Harrison, Charles and Wood, Paul. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Robbe‐Grillet, Alain. 1992. Commitment. In Art in theory, ed. Harrison, Charles and Wood, Paul. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Juan. 1991. Interview. In being América: essays on art, literature and identity from Latin America. Fredonia, N.Y.: White Pine Press.Google Scholar
Sparshott, Francis. 1990. Imagination—The very idea. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48 (1): 1–8.10.2307/431195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stecker, Robert. 2000. Is it reasonable to attempt to define art? In Theories of art today, ed. Carroll, Noel. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Stolnitz, Jerome. 1991. On the historical triviality of art. British Journal of Aesthetics 31 (2): 195–202.10.1093/bjaesthetics/31.3.195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsang, Henry. 1995. Inside, outside, upside down: in search of cultural space with the Chinese Cultural Centre in Vancouver. In Questions of community, ed. Augaitis, Diana, Falk, Lorne, Gilbert, Sylvie, Anne Moser, Mary. Banff, Alberta: Banff Centre Press.Google Scholar
Tuer, Dot. 1995. Is it still privileged art: the politics of class and collaboration in the art practice of Carol Condé and Karl Beveridge. In But is it art? The spirit of art as activism, ed. Felshin, Nina. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Turner, John C.et al. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A Self‐Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar