Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T02:35:21.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Engaging with the Failures of Racial Empathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2023

Ashlie Sandoval*
Affiliation:
Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning, Harvard University, 125 Mt. Auburn Street 3rd Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: ashliesandoval@fas.harvard.edu

Abstract

In the face of media attention that has recently spotlighted police brutality, racialized COVID-19 deaths, and the renewed visibility of white-supremacy groups, scholars, tech entrepreneurs, and media pundits are calling for an increase in empathy, claiming that it may move white and non-Black people of color beyond feelings of pity to dismantling anti-Black racism. However, in the context of anti-Blackness, is racial empathy possible? And what can we expect from it? Examining philosophical critiques of empathy's capabilities by philosophers and scholars engaged in feminist philosophy and Black studies, alongside Heidi Maibom's four-part definition of empathy, I focus on what empathy's limitations might tell us about the emotional and material structures that prevent empathy from achieving the results its advocates often hope for. I argue that the feelings of racial empathy, which may activate in empathy-inducing activities, may instead paradoxically point to the very anti-Black psychological structures that prevent empathetic action. I also contend that the feelings of racial empathy do not themselves undo the relations of anti-Blackness, but tracing the racism implicit in their activation may serve as a self-reflexive tool, an ongoing process, for understanding how anti-Blackness has shaped one's sense of self, embodied awareness, and lifeworld.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, Olivia. 2020. Empathy and the value of humane understanding. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 104 (1): 5065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benjamin, Ruha. 2019. Race after technology: Abolitionist tools for the new Jim code. Medford, Mass.: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cherry, Myisha. 2017. What an [en]tangled web we weave: Emotions, motivation, and rethinking us and the “other.” Hypatia 32 (2): 439–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cogburn, Courtney D. 2017. Experiencing racism in VR. YouTube video. 13:34 min. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7T_u4hpiSE.Google Scholar
Coplan, Amy. 2014. Understanding empathy: Its features and effects. In Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives, ed. Coplan, Amy and Goldie, Peter. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DiAngelo, Robin J. 2020. White fragility: Why it's so hard for white people to talk about racism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Emerick, Barrett. 2016. Empathy and a life of moral endeavor. Hypatia 31 (1): 171–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Marilyn. 1983. Politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Trumansburg, N.Y.: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Gallegos de Castillo, Lori. 2018. Unconscious racial prejudice as psychological resistance: A limitation of the implicit bias model. Critical Philosophy of Race 6 (2): 262–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruen, Lori. 2017. Expressing entangled empathy: A reply. Hypatia 32 (2): 452–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartman, Saidiya V. 1997. Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ioanide, Paula. 2015. The emotional politics of racism: How feelings trump facts in an era of colorblindness. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Maibom, Heidi Lene. 2020. Empathy. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilderson, Frank B. 2015. “Raw life” and the ruse of empathy. In Performance, politics and activism, ed. Lichtenfels, Peter and Rouse, John. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Yang, Robert. 2017. “If you walk in someone else's shoes, then you've taken their shoes”: Empathy machines as appropriation machines. Radiator (blog). April 5.Google Scholar