Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T05:27:52.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Education, Equality, and Proto-Feminism in Maria Gaetana Agnesi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2024

Emanuele Costa Open the ORCID record for Emanuele Costa [Opens in a new window]
Emanuele Costa*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
*
Email: emanuele.costa@vanderbilt.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I analyse the works of Maria Gaetana Agnesi, an Italian mathematician of the eighteenth century. I specifically focus on the themes of proto-feminism, equality, and educational rights as persistent threads of her philosophical and scientific production. I emphasize her continuous efforts to highlight the place of women in the history of philosophy, presenting three chief texts in which these efforts are expressed. In her first work, the Academic oration, in which it is demonstrated that the studies of the liberal arts by the female sex are by no means inappropriate, I show how she articulates a rhetoric defence of women's educational rights. In her second work, the Philosophical propositions, I highlight how she combines Cartesian metaphysics and philosophy of mind to justify women's belonging to the history of philosophy. In analysing her final masterpiece, the Analytical institutions, I interpret the dedication to the Austrian empress Maria Theresa as a proto-feminist text, vindicating the leading role of women in history and society.

Type
Article
Information
Hypatia , First View , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnesi, Maria Gaetana. 1738. Propositiones philosophicae quas crebris disputationibus domi habitus coram clarissimis viris explicabat extempore, et ab objectis vindicabat Maria Cajetana de Agnesiis mediolanensis. Milan: Malatesta.Google Scholar
Agnesi, Maria Gaetana. 1748. Instituzioni analitiche ad uso della gioventù italiana. Milan: Nella Regia-Ducal Corte.Google Scholar
Agnesi, Maria Gaetana. 1801. Analytical institutions for the use of Italian youth, tr. Colson, John. London: Taylor & Wilks.Google Scholar
Agnesi, Maria Gaetana. 2005. Academic oration, in which it is demonstrated that the studies of the liberal arts by the female sex are by no means inappropriate. In The contest for knowledge: Debates over women's learning in eighteenth-century Italy, ed. Findlen, Paula and Messbarger, Ruth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, Tjitske, and Stuurman, Siep. 1998. Perspectives on feminist political thought in European history: From the Middle Ages to the present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bryson, Cynthia. 1998. Mary Astell: Defender of the disembodied mind. Hypatia 13 (4): 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cereta, Laura. 1997. Collected letters of a Renaissance feminist, ed. Robin, D.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Desmond, ed. 2013. The equality of sexes: Three feminist texts of the seventeenth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cott, Nancy. 1989. What's in a name? The limits of social feminism: Or, expanding the vocabulary of women's history. Journal of American History 76 (3): 809–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gournay, Marie. 2013. The equality of men and women. In The equality of sexes: Three feminist texts of the seventeenth century, ed. Clarke, Desmond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Detlefsen, Karen. 2016. Custom, freedom, and equality: Mary Astell on marriage and women's education. In Feminist interpretations of Mary Astell, ed. Sowaal, Alice and Weiss, Penny. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.Google Scholar
Fido, Franco. 1989. Italian contributions to the eighteenth-century debate on women. Annali d'Italianistica 7: 216–25.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula. 2005. Translator's introduction. In The contest for knowledge: Debates over women's learning in eighteenth-century Italy, ed. Findlen, Paula and Messbarger, Ruth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Findlen, Paula, and Messbarger, Ruth, eds. 2005. The contest for knowledge: Debates over women's learning in eighteenth-century Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Frankel, Lois. 1989. Damaris Cudworth Masham: A seventeenth century feminist philosopher. Hypatia 4: 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Karen. 2021. The rights of woman and the equal rights of men. Political Theory 49 (3): 403–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagengruber, Ruth. 2015. Cutting through the veil of ignorance: Rewriting the history of philosophy. The Monist 98 (1): 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harth, Erica. 1992. Cartesian women: Versions and subversions of rational discourse in the old regime. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Hubert. 1987. Maria Gaetana Agnesi (1718–1799). In Women of Mathematics: A Bibliographical Sourcebook, ed. Grinstein, Louise and Campbell, Paul. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
La Vopa, Anthony. 2010. Sexless minds at work and at play: Poullain de la Barre and the origins of early modern feminism. Representations 109: 57–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehner, Ulrich. 2016. The Catholic Enlightenment: The forgotten history of a global movement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maber, Richard. 2010. Re-gendering intellectual life: Gilles Ménage and his “Histoire des femmes philosophes.” Seventeenth-Century French Studies 32 (1): 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinella, Lucrezia. 1999. The nobility and excellence of women, and the defects and vices of men, ed. Dunhill, Anne and Panizza, Letizia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzotti, Massimo. 2001. Maria Gaetana Agnesi: Mathematics and the making of the Catholic Enlightenment. Isis 92 (4): 657–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzotti, Massimo. 2007. The world of Maria Gaetana Agnesi, mathematician of God. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ménage, Gilles. 1984. The history of women philosophers, ed. and tr. Zedler, Beatrice. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Messbarger, Ruth. 2005. The Italian Enlightenment reform of the querelle des femmes. In The contest for knowledge: Debates over women's learning in eighteenth-century Italy, ed. Findlen, Paula and Messbarger, Ruth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Offen, Karen. 1988. Defining feminism: A comparative historical approach. Signs 14: 119–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offen, Karen. 2000. European feminisms, 1700–1950: A political history. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, Eileen. 1998. Disappearing ink: Early modern women philosophers and their fate in history. In Philosophy in a feminist voice: Critiques and reconstructions, ed. Kourany, Janet. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Eileen. 2019. Introduction. In Feminist history of philosophy: The recovery and evaluation of women's philosophical thought, ed. O'Neill, Eileen and Lascano, Marcy. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Poullain de la Barre, François. 2005. Three Cartesian feminist treatises, ed. Welch, Marcelle Maistre, tr. Bosley, Vivien. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reuter, Martina. 2019. The gender of the Cartesian mind, body, and mind-body union. In Mind, body, and morality: New perspectives on Descartes and Spinoza, ed. Reuter, Martina and Svensson, Frans. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Sarah Gwineth. 2009. The birth of feminism: Woman as intellect in renaissance Italy and England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, Londa. 1989. The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stuurman, Siep. 1997. Social Cartesianism: François Poulain de la Barre and the origins of the Enlightenment. Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (4): 617–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuurman, Siep. 2004. François Poulain de la Barre and the invention of modern equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Truesdell, Clifford. 1989. Maria Gaetana Agnesi. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 40 (2): 113–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Schurman, Anna Maria. 2013a. A dissertation on the natural capacities of women for study and learning. In The equality of sexes: Three feminist texts of the seventeenth century, ed. Clarke, Desmond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Van Schurman, Anna Maria. 2013b. Excerpts from the correspondence: Van Schurman to Marie de Gournay. In The equality of sexes: Three feminist texts of the seventeenth century, ed. Clarke, Desmond. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Verri, Pietro. 1983. “Manoscritto” per Teresa, ed. Barbatisi, Gennaro. Milan: Serra e Riva.Google Scholar
Waithe, Mary Ellen. 1987. Introduction. In A history of women philosophers, 4 vols, vol. 1. Ancient women philosophers, 600 BC–500 AD. Dordrecht and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Whaley, Leigh. 2016. Networks, patronage and women of science during the Italian Enlightenment. Early Modern Women: An Interdisciplinary Journal 11 (1): 187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar