Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T16:44:15.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Reading The Orange

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Josephine Donovan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ecofeminism, a new vein in feminist theory, critiques the ontology of domination, whereby living beings are reduced to the status of objects, which diminishes their moral significance, enabling their exploitation, abuse, and destruction. This article explores the possibility of an ecofeminist literary and cultural practice, whereby the text is not reduced to an “it” but rather recognized as a “thou,” and where new modes of relationship—dialogue, conversation, and meditative attentiveness—are developed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Spring 1996 , pp. 161 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © 1996 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Carol J. 1991. The sexual politics of meat: Afeminist‐vegetarian critical theory. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Adams, Carol J. ed., 1993. Ecofeminism and the sacred. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail. [1929] 1973. Problems of Dostoievsky's poetics. Trans. Rotsel, R. W.N.P.: Ardis.Google Scholar
Bigwood, Carol. 1993. Earth muse: Feminism, nature, and art. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin. [1947] 1965. Between man and man. Trans. Smith, Ronald Gregor. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin. 1970. I and Thou. Trans. Walter, . New York: Scribner's.Google Scholar
Cameron, Kenneth Walter. 1971. Young Emerson's transcendental vision. Hartford: Transcendental Books.Google Scholar
Cheney, Jim. 1987. Ecofeminism and deep ecology. Environmental Ethics 9(Summer): 115–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, Jim. 1989. Postmodern environmental ethics: Ethics as bioregional narrative. Environmental Ethics 11(Summer): 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. 1989. L'Heure de Clarice Lispectm, Précédé de Vivre l'Orange. Paris: des femmes.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélène. 1990. Reading with Clarice Lispectm. Trans. Verena, . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Josephine. 1991. The pattern of birds and beasts: Willa Cather and women's art. In Writing the Woman Artist, ed. Suzanne, . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Josephine. [1985] 1992. Feminist theory: The intellectual traditions of American feminism. Rev. ed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Donovan, Josephine. 1993a. Jewett and Swedenborg. American Literature 65(4): 731–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, Josephine. 1993b. Everyday use and moments of being: Toward a nondominativ, aesthetic. In Feminism and aesthetics, ed. Korsmeyer, Carolyn and Hilde, . Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Josephine. 1993c. Breaking the sentence: Local‐color literature and subjugated knowledges. In The (other) American traditions, ed. Joyce, . New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 1983. Literary theory: An introduction. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Philosophy and feminist thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Homans, Margaret. 1986. Bearing the word: Language and female experience in nineteenthcentury women's writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Kathryn Montgomery. 1991. Doctor's stories: The narrative structure of medical knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jewett, Sarah Orne. 1876. Letter to Theophilus Parsons, 24 August. Special Collections, Miller Library, Colby College, Waterville, Maine. Quoted by permission of the Colby College Library.Google Scholar
Jewett, Sarah Orne. 1877. Deephaven. Boston: James R. Osgood.Google Scholar
Jewett, Sarah Orne. 1881. A winter drive. In Country by‐ways. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jewett, Sarah Orne. [1886] 1956. A white heron. In The country of the pointed firs and other stories. Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
Jewett, Sarah Orne. 1911. Letters of Sarah Ome Jewett. Ed. Annie, . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jewett, Sarah Orne. 1967. Sarah Orne Jewett letters. Ed. Cary, Richard. Rev. ed. Waterville, ME: Colby College Press.Google Scholar
Kepnes, Steven. 1992. The text as thou: Martin Buber's dkdogical hermeneutics and narrative theology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kowalski, Gary A. 1991. The souls of animals. Walpole, NH: Stillpoint.Google Scholar
Lauter, Estella. 1984. Women as mythmakers: Poetry and visual art iry twenrieth'Century women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lorde, Andre. 1984. Uses of the erotic: The erotic as power. In Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.Google Scholar
Morson, Gary Saul, and Emerson, Caryl. 1990. Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a prosaics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1959a. The sublime and the good. Chicago Review 13(Autumn): 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1959b. The sublime and the beautiful revisited. Yale Review 69 (December 247–71.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. 1971. The sovereignty of good. New York: Schocken.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Iris. [1992] 1993. Metaphysics as a guide to morals. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
Murphy, Patrick. 1991a. Ground, pivot, motion: Ecofeminist theory, dialogics, and literary practice. Hypatia 6(1): 146–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Patrick. 1991b. Prolegomenon for an ecofeminist dialogics. In Feminism, Bakhtin, and the dialogic, ed. Bauer, Dale M. and McKinstry, Susan Jaret. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Sharon. 1987. Willa Cather: The emerging voice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and literacy: Technologizing the word. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlina, Nina. 1984. Mikhail Bakhtin and Martin Buber: Problems of dialogic imagination. Studies in Twentieth-Century Literature 9(1): 13–28.Google Scholar
Rich, Adrienne. 1973. Diving into the wreck—Poems. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Scholtmeijer, Marian. 1995. The power of otherness: Animals in women's fiction. In Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explorations, ed. Adams, Carol J. and Donovan, Josephine. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Schweickart, Patrocinio P. 1986. Reading ourselves: Toward a feminist theory of reading. In Gender and reading: Essays on readers, texts, and contexts, ed. Flynn, Elizabeth A. and Schweickart, Patrocinio P.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. 1966. Against interpretation and other essays. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1984. Studies in the theory of ideology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Warren, Karen J. 1987. Feminism and ecology: Making connections. Environmental Ethics 9(Spring): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, Simone. 1977. The Simone Weil reader. Ed. Panichas, George A.New York: George McKay.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia. [1929] 1957. A room of one's own. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia 1966. Modern fiction. In Collected essays, vol. 2. London: Hogarth.Google Scholar
Woolf, Virginia 1985. Moments of being. Ed. Shulkind, Jeanne. 2d ed. San Diego: Harcourt.Google Scholar