Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:14:41.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Early Modern Women Philosophers and the History of Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Eileen O'Neill
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Meeting Report
Information
Hypatia , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , Summer 2005 , pp. 185 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Åkerman, Susanna. 1991. Queen Christina of Sweden and her circle: The transformation of a seventeenth‐Century philosophical libertine. Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Astell, Mary. 1701. A serious proposal to the ladies for the advancement of their true and greatest interest, Part I. London: Printed by J. R. for R. Wilkin.Google Scholar
Atherton, Margaret, ed. 1994. Women philosophers of the early modern period. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Australian Journal of French Studies: Autour de Michele he Doeuff. 2003. 40, no. 3 (September/December).Google Scholar
de Baar, Mirjam, et al., eds. 1996. Choosing the better part: Anna Maria van Schurman (1607–1678). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1989. The second sex. Trans. Parshley, H. M.New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Broad, Jacqueline. 2002. Women philosophers of the seventeenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clucas, Stephen, ed. 2003. A princely brave woman: Essays on Margaret Cavendish, Duchess of Newcastle. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
ConleyJohn J., S. J John J., S. J. 2002. The suspicion of virtue: Women philosophers in neoclassical France. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dykeman, Theresa Boos, ed. 1999. The neglected canon: Nine women philosophers first to the twentieth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Fraisse, Geneviève. 1994. Reason's muse: Sexual difference and the birth of democracy. Trans. Marie Todd, Jane. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Catherine Villaneuva. 2003. Women philosophers: Genre and the boundaries of philosophy. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Harth, Erica. 1992. Cartesian women: Versions and subversions of rational discourse in the old regime. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Héricourt, Jenny d'. 1864. A woman's philosophy of woman; Or, woman affranchised. New York: Carleton.Google Scholar
Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy. 1989. Special issue on the history of women in philosophy. 4 (1).Google Scholar
Kelly, Linda. 1987. Women of the French revolution. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Kolbrener, William, and Michelson, Michal, eds. Forthcoming. Mary Astell: Reason, gender, faith. Aldershot: Ashgate.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michèle. 2003. The sex of knowing, Trans. Hamer, Kathryn and Code, Lorraine. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Le Doeuff, Michèle. 1991. Hipparchia's choice. Trans. Selous, Trista. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McAlister, Linda Lopez, ed. 1996. Hypatia's daughters: Fifteen hundred years of women philosophers. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Judith Sargent. 1995. Observations on female abilities. In Selected writings of Judith Sargent Murray, ed. Harris, Sharon M.New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nye, Andrea. 1999. The princess and the philosopher: Letters of Elisabeth of the Palatine to René Descartes. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Eileen. Forthcoming. Justifying the inclusion of women in our histories of philosophy: The case of Marie de Gournay. In Guide to feminist philosophy, ed. Alcoff, Linda and Kittay, Eva. Oxford and Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Eileen. 2004. The forgetting of gender and new histories of philosophy: A response to Nancy Tuana. In Teaching new histories of philosophy, ed. Schneewind, J. B.Princeton: University Center for Human Values, Princeton University.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Eileen. 1999. Women Cartesians, “feminine philosophy,” and historical exclusion. In Feminist interpretations of Descartes, ed. Bordo, Susan. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
O'Neill, Eileen. 1998. Disappearing ink: Early modern women philosophers and their fate in history. In Philosophy in a feminist voice: Critiques and reconstructions, ed. Kournay, Janet A.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rée, Jonathan. 2002. Women philosophers and the canon. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (4): 641–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1758. Letter to M. d'Alembert on the theater.Google Scholar
Springborg, Patricia, ed. 1996. Asteil: Political writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Titone, Connie. 2004. Gender equality in the philosophy of education: Catherine Macaulay's forgotten contribution. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tougas, Cecile T., and Ebenreck, Sara. 2000. Presenting women philosophers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Waithe, Mary Ellen, ed. 19871995. A history of women philosophers, vols. 1–4. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Warnock, Mary, ed. 1996. Women philosophers. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1988. A vindication of the rights of woman, ed. Poston, Carol H.New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar