Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:28:07.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coincidences of Comparison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Rada Iveković
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rada Iveković reflects on the significance of modernity in contemporary Indian philosophy. Where the orient has been figured as the other for western philosophers, she asks how Indian philosophy depicts the west, how philosophers such as Kant have been interpreted, and how thematics such as pluralism, tolerance, relativity, innovation, and curiosity about the foreign have been figured in both ancient and contemporary Indian philosophy. While working on the western side with such authors as Lyotard, Deleuze, Serres, or Irigaray, Iveković doesn't exactly indulge in comparative philosophy. Rather, she tries to make the most of the existing “coincidences,” using both western and Asian thought in order to open a new area for the production of concepts and a new field for philosophy in general.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 15 , Issue 4: Special Issue: Contemporary French Women Philosophers , Fall 2000 , pp. 224 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhattacharyya, Krishna Chandra 1979. Studies in philosophy. Delhi‐Patna‐Varanasi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, Kalidas 1963. Alternative standpoints in philosophy. Calcutta: Progressive Publishers.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, Kalidas 1985. The philosophy of Kalidas Bhattacharyya. ed.Krishna, Dara, with Ghose, A. M. and Srivastava, P. K.Poona: Indian Philosophical Quarterly.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Parnet, Claire 1990. Pourparlers. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1991. L'autre cap. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1992. The other heading: Reflections on today's Europe. Trans.Brault, Pascale‐Anne and Naas, Michael B.Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Droit, Roger‐Pol. 1989. L'oubli de l'Inde: Une amnésie philosophique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Heller, Ágnes 1982. A theory of history. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hulin, Michel 1985. La face cachée du temps: L'imaginaire de l'au‐delà. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Iveković, Rada 1987. Der Leere Platz des Anderen. In Viele Orte Überall? Feminismus in Bewegung, ed.Hauser, Kornelia. Frankfurt am Main: Argument SB.Google Scholar
Iveković, Rada 1989. Indija—Fragmenti osamdesetih. Filozofija i srodne discipline [India, fragments from the 1980's. Philosophy and related disciplines]. Zagreb: Filozofska Istraživanja.Google Scholar
Krishna, Daya, ed. 1987. India's intellectual traditions: Attempts at conceptual reconstruction. Delhi: Indian Council for Philosophical Research‐Motilal Banarsidas.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean‐François. 1977. Les TRANSformateurs Duchamp. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean‐François. 1988. The differend: Phrases in dispute. Trans.Van Den Abbeele, Georges. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Masson‐Oursel, Paul 1923a. Esquisse d'une histoire de la philosophie indienne. Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Masson‐Oursel, Paul 1923b. La Philosophie comparée. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Mukerji, Bithika 1983. Neo‐Vendânta and modernity. Varanasi: Ashutoshi Prakashan Samsthan.Google Scholar
Nāgārjuna, . 1961. Le stanze del cammino di mezzo. Trad. Raniero Gnoli. Torino: Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Nāgārjuna, . 1986. The philosophy of the middle way/Mulamadhyamakakarika. Trans.David, J. Kalupahana. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Nāgārjuna, . n.d. Sanskrta text of Mulamadhyamakakarika. In The conception of Buddhist Nirvana, by Stcherbatsky, T. H.Varanasi: Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Haijime 1981. Ways of thinking of eastern peoples: India‐China‐Tibet‐Japan. ed.Wiener, P. P.Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Veljačić, Čedomil 1958. Filozofija istočnih naroda/Philosophy of oriental peoples. 2 vols. Zagreb: Matica Hrvatska.Google Scholar
Veljačić, Čedomil [also known as Ñānaj?vako, Bhikkhu]. 1983. Studies in comparative philosophy, vol I: Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Existentialism and Buddhism. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Lake House.Google Scholar
Serres, Michel 1985. Les cinq sens. Philosophie des corps mêlés. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
Serres, Michel 1991. Rome:The book of foundations. Trans.McCarren, Felicia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Serres, Michel 1995. The natural contract. Trans.MacArthur, Elizabeth and Paulson, William. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.9725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vattimo, Gianni 1988. The end of modernity: Nihilism and hermeneutics in post‐modern culture. Trans.Snyder, Jon R.Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Vattimo, Gianni, and Rovatti, Pier Aldo 1987. Il Pensiere debole. Milano: G. Feltrinelli.Google Scholar