Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T11:57:17.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Care and the Limits of a Pro-Choice Discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2024

Ann E. Bartos Open the ORCID record for Ann E. Bartos [Opens in a new window]
Ann E. Bartos*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, Penn State University, University Park, USA
*
Email: anniebartos@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The global pandemic exposed many flaws in the gendered political economy. It also illuminated how essential care is to our economy and to our flourishing. Yet, when care is dependent on a capitalist system that relies on competition, there will always be people who receive care and those that will not. In such a system, care is wrongly perceived to be a “choice” one can opt into or out of. This short essay grapples with the discourse of care as a choice, particularly around reproductive decisions. Choices offered within a neoliberal market logic fail to understand the political relationalities of such choices. Drawing on my personal experience of an abortion and other examples from the first year of COVID-19, this essay demonstrates how little choice there is in matters of care; care connects and disconnects one another regardless of personal choices. If matters of care persist in the realm of the market reliant on rational economic autonomous actors, then the many interrelationalities of care that the pandemic exposed will not have any impact on attaining a more caring society. This is particularly important given the nature of abortion politics in the United States. I argue that abortion is health care, and is often the most caring decision a pregnant person can make for the world they are trying to maintain, continue, and repair (per Tronto 1993). Care is not a choice; it is fundamental to human society.

Type
Musing
Information
Hypatia , First View , pp. 1 - 8
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hypatia, a Nonprofit Corporation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bazelon, Emily. 2020. The coronavirus becomes an excuse to restrict abortions. New York Times, March 26.Google Scholar
Budgeon, Shelly. 2015. Individualized femininity and feminist politics of choice. European Journal of Women's Studies 22 (3): 303–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Allison. 2019. Our child received a devastating diagnosis before she was born: We decided to protect her. STAT, January 7.Google Scholar
Datta, Kavita, McIlwaine, Cathy, Evans, Yara, Herbert, Joanna, May, Jon, and Wills, Jane. 2010. A migrant ethic of care? Negotiating care and caring among migrant workers in London's low-pay economy. Feminist Review 94 (1): 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, Kim. 2010. Home, work and shifting geographies of care. Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (2): 131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fadal, Leila. 2020. Motel converted into quarantine site sparks controversy. NPR, March 8.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lisa. 2020. E.P.A., citing coronavirus, drastically relaxes rules for polluters. New York Times, March 26.Google Scholar
Friedman, Uri. 2020. New Zealand's Prime Minister may be the most effective leader on the planet. The Atlantic, April 19.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 2003. In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grierson, Jamie. 2020. Domestic abuse killings “more than double” amid Covid-19 lockdown. The Guardian, April 15.Google Scholar
Guo, Eileen. 2020. Coronavirus threatens an already strained maternal health system. New York Times, March 26.Google Scholar
Hamblin, James. 2020. The curve is not flat enough. The Atlantic, March 28.Google Scholar
Kagen, Marc. 2020. “Essential” workers are dying. Slate, April 2.Google Scholar
Kitchener, Caroline. 2020. Women academics seem to be submitting fewer papers during coronavirus. The Lily, April 24.Google Scholar
Laguens, Dawn. 2013. Planned Parenthood and the next generation of feminist activists. Feminist Studies 39 (1): 187–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Grice, Jade. 2014. Māori and reproduction, sexuality education, maternity, and abortion. PhD dissertation, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Lewis, Helen. 2020a. The coronavirus is a disaster for feminism. The Atlantic, March 19.Google Scholar
Lewis, Helen. 2020b. How panic-buying revealed the problem with the modern world. The Atlantic, March 26.Google Scholar
Lewis, Helen. 2020c. You should politicize the coronavirus. The Atlantic, May 1.Google Scholar
Little, Andrew. 2020. The week we brought New Zealand's abortion laws into the 21st century. The Guardian, March 19.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Jeannnie. 2012. Love and goodness: Toward a new abortion politics. Feminist Studies 38 (2): 474–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milano, Brett. 2020. Restricting civil liberties amid COVID-19 pandemic. Harvard Gazette, March 25.Google Scholar
Minello, Alessandra. 2020. The pandemic and the female academic. Nature, April 17.Google Scholar
Naryan, Uma. 1995. Colonialism and its others: Considerations on rights and care discourses. Hypatia 10 (2): 133–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, Scott. 2020. Global lockdowns resulting in “horrifying surge” in domestic violence, U.N. warns. NPR, April 6.Google Scholar
Odozor, Ezinwanne Toochukwu. 2022. A love ethic for Black feminisms: The necessity of love in Black feminist discourses and discoveries. Hypatia 37: 241–56. doi:10.1017/hyp.2022.13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piepmeier, Alison. 2013. The inadequacy of “choice”: Disability and what's wrong with feminist framings of reproduction. Feminist Studies 39 (1): 159–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porschitz, Emily T., and Siler, Elizabeth A.. 2017. Miscarriage in the workplace: An autoethnography. Gender, Work and Organization 24 (6): 565–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Kimala. 2010. What is reproductive justice? How women of color activists are redefining the pro-choice paradigm. Meridians 10 (2): 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghuram, Parvati, Madge, Clare, and Noxolo, Patricia. 2009. Rethinking responsibility and care for a postcolonial world. Geoforum 40 (1): 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebouché, Rachel, and Ziegler, Mary. 2022. There's no knowing what will happen when Roe falls. The Atlantic, April 25.Google Scholar
Robertson, Campbell, and Gebeloff, Robert. 2020. How millions of women became the most essential workers in America. New York Times, April 18.Google Scholar
Robinson, Fiona. 2011. The ethics of care: A feminist approach to human security. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, Loretta, and Solinger, Rickie. 2017. Reproductive justice: An introduction. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Martha, and McNeill, Rob. 2008. Geographical access to termination of pregnancy services in New Zealand. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 32 (6): 519–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, Andrea. 2005. Beyond pro-choice versus pro-life: Women of color and reproductive justice. NWSA Journal 17 (1): 119–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Susan. 2005. States, markets and an ethic of care. Political Geography 24 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan. 2013. Caring democracy: Markets, equality and justice. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
UW Medicine Newsroom. 2020. UW Medicine limits hospital visitors for patients’ safety. https://newsroom.uw.edu/news/uw-medicine-limits-hospital-visitors-patients-safetyGoogle Scholar
West, Robin. 2008. From choice to reproductive justice: De-constitutionalizing abortion rights. Yale Law Journal 118: 1394.Google Scholar