Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-sp8b6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T06:02:46.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reflection, Nature, and Moral Law: The Extent of Catharine Cockburn's Lockeanism in her Defence of Mr. Locke's Essay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Patricia Sheridan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This essay examines Catharine Cockburn's moral philosophy as it is developed in her Defence of Mr. Locke's Essay on Human Understanding. In this work, Cockburn argues that Locke's epistemological principles provide a foundation for the knowledge of natural law. Sheridan suggests that Cockburn's objective in defending Locke's moral epistemology was conditioned by her own prior commitment to a significantly un-Lockean theory of morality. In exploring Cockburn's views on morality in terms of their divergence from Locke's, the author hopes to underscore the extent of Cockburn's intellectual independence and her philosophical creativity.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , Summer 2007 , pp. 133 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bolton, Martha Brandt. 1996. Some aspects of the philosophical work of Catharine Trotter Cockburn. In Hypatia's daughters: Fifteen hundred years of women philosophers, ed. McAlister, Linda Lopez. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Burnet, Thomas Locke, John, and Porter, Noah. 1984. Remarks upon an essay concerning humane understanding, five tracts. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
[Cockburn, Catharine Trotter]. 1743. Remarks upon some Writers in the Controversy concerning the Foundation of moral Duty and moral Obligation. In History of the works of the learned. London: Printed for T. Cooper.Google Scholar
Cockburn, Catharine Trotter. 1751. The works of Mrs. Catharine Cockburn, theological, moral, dramatic, and poetical. Ed. Birch, Thomas. London: J. and P. Knapton.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 1995. The British moralists and the internal “ought.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelley, Anne. 2002. Catharine Trotter: An early modern writer in the vanguard of feminism. Hampshire, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. W. 1981. New essays on human understanding. Ed. Remnant, Peter and Bennett, Jonathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An essay concerning human understanding. Ed. Nidditch, P. H. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1997. Locke: Political essays. Ed. Goldie, Mark. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 2002. John Locke: Selected correspondence. Ed. Goldie, Mark. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Michael. 1996. Good without God. In Natural law, liberalism, and morality, ed. George, Robert P. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Railton, Peter. 1986. Moral realism. Philosophical Review 95 (2): 163–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, Leslie. 1959/1960. Dictionary of national biography. Volume 4. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Nicholas. 1986. What difference does it make whether moral realism is true? Southern Journal of Philosophy, 24, supp.: 115–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toland, John. 1696. Christianity not mysterious. London: Sam Buckley.Google Scholar
Toland, John. 1704. Letters to Serena. London: Bernard Lintot.Google Scholar