Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T19:25:18.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theological Considerations—Hermeneutical, Ecclesiological, Eschatological Regarding Memory and Reconciliation: The Church and the Faults of the Past

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2013

Bernard P. Prusak
Affiliation:
Villanova University

Abstract

This article analyzes the International Theological Commission's Memory and Reconciliation: The Church and the Faults of the Past (MR). The document offers methodological reflections about how to proceed in implementing Pope John Paul II's call for the church to ask for forgiveness for past offenses at the dawn of the third millennium of Christianity. MR thus seeks to clarify “the reasons, the conditions, and the exact form of the requests for forgiveness for the faults of the past.” The article raises some specific concerns regarding the three operative distinctions that MR proposes to be applied: between the holiness of the church emphatically differentiated from holiness (and sinfulness) in the church; between church and social context in making historical and theological judgments; and between magisterium and authority in the church (that allows MR to explain how behavior contrary to the Gospel by persons vested with authority in the church need not imply involvement of the magisterial charism).

Type
Editorial Symposium
Copyright
Copyright © The College Theology Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 English text in Origins: CNS Documentary Service 29/39 (16 March 2000): 625–44, here 628.

2 “As the Third Millennium Draws Near,” Origins: CNS Documentary Service 24/24 (24 November 1994), 401–16, here 410.

3 See Origins: CNS Documentary Service 23/29 (23 March 2000): 645–48.

4 Section 1.3 and notes 18 & 19; Origins 29, 629 & 642.

5 Origins 29: 627.

6 Ibid.

7 Lumen gentium, 8.

8 Commentary on the Documents of Vatican II, vol. 1, ed. Vorgrimler, Herbert (New York: Herder and Herder, 1967), 148–49.Google Scholar

9 Lumen gentium, 8; also see Unitatis redintegratio, 3 and 6; Paul VI, Credo of the People of God (30 June 1968), 19: Enchiridion Vaticanum 3: 264f; Origins 29: 634.

10 Gaudium et spes, 43, 6.

11 Origins 29: 629; Lumen gentium, 8; cf. Unitatis redintegratio, 6: “Christ summons the Church, as she goes her pilgrim way, to that continual reform of which she always has need, insofar as she is a human institution here on earth.”

12 Biblical citations are from The Holy Bible, New Revised Standard Version, with the Apocryphal/Deuterocanonical Books (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

13 See Brown, Raymond E., The Churches the Apostles Left Behind (New York: Paulist, 1984), 4760Google Scholar; Harrington, Daniel J., God's People in Christ: New Testament Perspectives on the Church and Judaism (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980), 6774Google Scholar, and The Light of All Nations: Essays on the Church in New Testament Research (Wilmington, DE: Michael Glazier, 1982), 71–72; Tillard, J.-M.R., Church of Churches: An Ecclesiology of Communion, trans. De Peaux, R.C. (Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press/ Michael Glazier Book, 1992), 4553.Google Scholar

14 The Churches the Apostles Left Behind, 51.

15 Explanations of Psalms 30.4; 127.3; Sermon 341. 1 & 10.

16 City of God 1.35; 10.7; 18.49; 19.27; 21.25; 11.9; 15.15; Confessions 12.11.13.

17 City of God 14.28; 22.1; Enchiridion 29; 62.

18 Lumen gentium, 48.

19 Aquinas, Thomas, Summa theologiae 3Google Scholar, 8, 3, ad 2.

20 Gaudium et spes, 43, 6.

21 Origins 29: 635; John Paul II, Tertio Millennio Adveniente, 35: “As the Third Millennium Draws Near,” Origins 24: 411.

22 Sermo 181,5,7:PL 38, 982; Origins 29: 634.

23 Litterae ad Catholicae Ecclesiae episcopos de aliquibus aspectibus Ecclesiae prout est communio, Acta Apostolicae Sedis 85 (1993): 838–65; English translation, “Church as Communion,” no. 9, in Catholic International 3 (September, 1992): 763–64.

24 Lumen gentium, 23.

25 “Address to the Roman Curia,” (20 December 1990) no. 9; Acta Apostolicae Sedis 83 (1991): 745–47.

26 “Church as Communion,” no. 9, Catholic International, 764.

27 Origins 29: 629–30.

28 Ibid., 631–32.

29 Paul, John II, Tertio Millennio Adveniente, 33Google Scholar: “As the Third Millennium Draws Near,” Origins 24: 410.

30 MR, sections 3.1–3.2; Origins 29: 633–34.

31 Origins 29: 635.

32 Ibid., 636.

33 Ibid., 637; Paul, John II, Tertio Millennio Adveniente, 35Google Scholar: “As the Third Millennium Draws Near,” Origins 24: 411.

34 Origins 29: 638.

35 L'Osservatore Romano, English Edition, 15 July 1998, 3.

36 Origins 29: 641.

37 Bainton, Roland, The Medieval Church (Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger, 1983 reprint; original 1962), 118.Google Scholar Conflated from several versions translated in Munro, Dana Carlton, “Urban and the Crusaders,” Translations and Reprints (University of Pennsylvania, 1901).Google Scholar

38 Bainton, , The Medieval Church, 3839.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., 118–19: cited from The Capture of Jerusalem in 1099. Raymond of Agiles, Historia Francorum, trans. Duncalf, Frederick & Krey, August C., Parallel Source Problems in Medieval History (New York: Harper & Bros., 1912).Google Scholar

40 “To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation” (section 24) in Luther, Martin, Three Treatises ((Philadelphia: Fortress, 1978), 8788.Google Scholar

41 Congar, Yves M.J., “L'ecclésiologie, de la Révolution française au Concile du Vatican, sous le signe de l'affirmation de l'autorité,” in L'ecclésiologie au XIXe siècle, ed. Nédoncelle, Maurice (Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1960), 99100.Google Scholar

42 Principiarum fidei doctrinalium Demonstratio methodica, Controv. IV, bk. VIII, c. 12 (1572 and Paris, 1579); cited by Congar, , L'Église: De saint Augustin à l'époque moderne (Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1970), 371.Google Scholar Stapleton maintained the early Fathers were teachers only because they had the episcopal or priestly grace or charism: Principiarum fidei … Demonstratio methodica, Controv. III, bk. VII, c. 12.

43 Cited from Vatican Council II, vol. 1: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents, ed. Flannery, Austin (Northport, NY: Costello, 1992), 739–40.Google Scholar