Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T00:36:08.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-Examining Experience: The New South African Historiography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2014

Gary Minkley
Gary Minkley*
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In two recent published, edited works, a series of papers is brought together to demonstrate the explicit attempt to rethink and reconstruct the theoretical and methodological foundations of South African historiography. The editors point to the important impact the “new school” of radical historiography had in challenging and establishing a “break” with the racial and implicated “ruling class” perspective of the liberal paradigm over the last decade and a half. While acknowledging the further importance and advances made by this new radicalism in emphasizing class analysis and enriching and expanding the understanding of South Africa's capitalist development, there have also been certain crucial limitations. Marks and Rathbone argue that

…it has been more concerned with the problems of capital accumulation and the state, with so-called “fractions of capital” and the white workers, than with black class formation and consciousness. The impact of Althusserian structuralism on radical writing in the seventies reinforced this trend: blacks are relegated to being no more than a silent backdrop against which the political drama is enacted, as much “dominated classes” in these texts as their authors see them in reality.

This, together with what Bozzoli has called the “dominant Philistinism and anti-historical character of the culture” also prevalent in the radical historiography, prevented the generation and development of an ‘alternative’ conception of history in South Africa. If this alternative is to be developed, the stronghold of structuralist method of analysis with its “antihistorical bias” and concentration of objective tendencies needs not only to be countered, but abandoned.

Type
Research Article
Information
History in Africa , Volume 13 , 1986 , pp. 269 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Marks, Shula and Rathbone, R.J.A.R., eds., Industrialisation and Social Change in South Africa: African Class Formation, Culture and Consciousness (London, 1982)Google Scholar; Bozzoli, Belinda, ed., Town and Countryside in the Transvaal: Capitalist Penetration and Popular Response (Johannesburg, 1983).Google Scholar

2. Marks, /Rathbone, , Industrialisation, 6.Google Scholar

3. Ibid., 7; Bozzoli, , Town and Countryside, 2, 8, 17.Google Scholar

4. Marks, /Rathbone, , Industrialisation, 7.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., 8.

6. Ibid., 13.

7. Ibid., 9.

8. Bozzoli, , Town and Countryside, 8.Google Scholar

9. Ibid., 4.

10. Ibid., 8.

11. See Thompson, E.P., The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays (New York, 1978), 40–50.Google Scholar

12. Bozzoli, , Town and Country, 10.Google Scholar

13. Ibid., 22.

14. Ibid., 28.

15. Ibid., 28, 29.

16. Ibid., 34.

17. Ibid., 40.

18. The example of Kimble, J., “Labour Migration in Basutoland, c. 1870-1855” in Marks, /Rathbone, , Industrialisation, 119–42.Google Scholar

19. Freund, William, review of Marks, /Rathbone, , Industrialisation, in Review of African Political Economy, no. 29 (1984), 159.Google Scholar

20. Bradford, H., “A Taste of Freedom” in Bozzoli, , Town and Countryside, 128–47.Google Scholar

21. Delius, and Trapido, , “Inboekselings and Oorlams” in Bozzoli, , Town and Countryside, 53–81.Google Scholar

22. Freund, review, 159.

23. Turrell, R., “Kimberley: Labour and Compounds, 1871-1888” in Marks, /Rathbone, , Industrialisation, 45–68.Google Scholar

24. Freund, review, 159.

25. Ibid., 159.

26. Popular Memory Group, “Popular Memory: Theory, Politics, Method” in Johnson, R., McLennan, G., Schwarz, B., Sutton, D., eds., Making Histories: Studies in History-Writing and Politics (London, 1982), 220–26.Google Scholar

27. Ibid., 221-22.

28. Ibid., 211, 219. For these reasons the study of popular memory is concerned with two sets of relations. It is concerned with the relation between dominant memory and oppositional forms across the whole public (including academic) field, as well as with the relation between these public discourses in their contemporary state of play and the more privatized sense of the past which is generated within a lived culture.

29. Bozzoli, , Town and Countryside, 17.Google Scholar

30. Johnson, R., “Three Problematics: Elements of a Theory of Working Class Culture” in Clarke, J., Critcher, C., and Johnson, R., Working Class Culture: Studies in History and Theory (London, 1979), 216.Google Scholar

31. Koch, E., “Without Visible Means of Subsistence: Slumyard Culture in Johannesburg 1918-1940, via E.P. Thompson, R. Johnson and A. Gramsci” in Bozzoli, , Town and Countryside, 154.Google Scholar

32. Anderson, Perry, Arguments Within English Marxism (London, 1980), 26, 27.Google Scholar

33. McLennan, G., “E.P. Thompson and the Discipline of Historical Context” in Making Histories, 117.Google Scholar

34. Sole, K., “Black Literature and Performance: Some Notes on Class and Populism,” South African Labour Bulletin, 9/8 (July 1984), 68–69.Google Scholar

35. Johnson, , “Three Problematics,” 222.Google Scholar

36. Sole, , “Black Literature,” 58–59.Google Scholar

37. Johnson, , “Three Problematics,” 219–24.Google Scholar

38. Anderson, Arguments, chs. 2 and 3.

39. Ibid., 40.

40. Hall, S., “Notes on Deconstructing ‘The Popular’” in Samuel, Raphael, ed., People's History and Socialist Theory (London, 1981), 234.Google Scholar

41. Bozzoli, , Town and Countryside, 17.Google Scholar

42. Johnson, , “Three Problematics,” 23.Google Scholar

43. Ibid., 234-236.

44. Johnson, R., “Against Absolutism” in Samuel, , People's History, 386–96.Google Scholar