Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:25:34.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“If We are Still Here Next Year”: Zambian Historical Research in the Context of Decline, 2002–2003

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2014

Miles Larmer
Miles Larmer*
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper addresses the challenges facing researchers seeking to explore the post-colonial history of Zambia, a country whose social infrastructure in general, and academic and research facilities in particular, are in a state of apparently perpetual decline. It describes some of the major archival resources available and their (significant) limitations. It surveys recent and ongoing attempts to document the history of nationalist movements and leaders. Finally, it explores the potential for developing a history of post-colonial Zambia which escapes the assumptions of a still dominant nationalist historiography, and which thereby contributes to a deeper understanding of the lives actually lived by Zambians since Independence.

The tendency for colonial and post-colonial governments and their advisors to seek to depoliticize issues of power, inequality and control, by turning them into “technical” or developmental issues, has been noted by historians and anthropologists. The historiography of post-colonial Zambia is a prime example of the conflation of history with development, creating a discourse that assesses historical change by the achievement of supposedly neutral development goals, and conflates the ideologies and policies of nationalist politicians with those of the nation as a whole. The relatively benign judgments passed by prominent historians of the colonial era in their postscript surveys of the government of Kenneth Kaunda's United National Independence Party (UNIP) in Zambia's First Republic (1964-72) have retained an unwarranted influence. This is partly because of the dearth of post-colonial historical studies of equal importance conducted during the last 20 years. UNIP's leading historian, Henry Meebelo, while providing valuable insights into the African perspective on decolonization, played a leading role in establishing nationalism as the unquestioned norm of progressive understanding, axiomatically placing all social forces which came into conflict with it as reactionary and illegitimate.

Type
Research Article
Information
History in Africa , Volume 31 , 2004 , pp. 215 - 229
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Ferguson, James, The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (Cambridge, 1990)Google Scholar; and Cooper, Frederick, Decolonization and African Society: the Labour Question in French and British Africa (Cambridge, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 See for example Mulford, D.C., Zambia: The Politics of Independence 1957-1964 (Oxford, 1967)Google Scholar; Bates, Robert H., Unions, Parties, and Political Development: a Study of Mineworkers in Zambia (New Haven, 1971)Google Scholar.

3 Hall, Richard, Zambia, 1890-1964: The Colonial Period (London 1965, 1976)Google Scholar; Roberts, A.D., A History of Zambia (London, 1976)Google Scholar.

4 Notable exceptions to this rule include Moore, Henrietta L. and Vaughan, Megan, Cutting Down Trees: Gender, Nutrition and Agricultural Change in the Northern Province of Zambia, 1890-1990 (Portsmouth NH, 1994)Google Scholar; and Bratton, Michael, The Local Politics of Rural Development: Peasant and Party-State in Zambia (Hanover, 1980)Google Scholar.

5 Meebelo, Henry S., Reaction to Colonialism (Manchester, 1971)Google Scholar; and idem., African Proletarians and Colonial Capitalism (Lusaka, 1986).

6 Gertzel, Cherry, Baylies, Carolyn, and Szeftel, Morris, eds., The Dynamics of the One-Party State in Zambia (Manchester, 1984)Google Scholar; Sichone, Owen and Chikulo, B.C., eds., Democracy in Zambia: Challenges for the Third Republic (Harare, 1996)Google Scholar; Ferguson, James, Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt (Berkeley, 1999)Google Scholar; Pottier, Johan, Migrants No More: Settlement and Survival in Mambwe Villages, Zambia (Bloomington, 1988)Google Scholar.

7 Times of Zambia (11 February 1976).

8 Professor Bizeck Phiri, a prominent Zambian historian and now Dean of UNZA's School of Humanities and Social Sciences, has explored this subject in The Crisis of an African University: A Historical Appraisal of the University of Zambia (Colorado Springs, 2001)Google Scholar.

9 The issues for such research are identified in Baylies, Carolyn, “State and Class in Postcolonial Africa” in Zeitlin, M., ed., Political Power and Social Theory (Greenwich, CT, 1985)Google Scholar. The best studies in this area to date remain Baylies, Carolyn and Szeftel, Morris, “The Rise of a Zambian Capitalist Class in the 1970s,” Journal of Southern African Studies 8(1982), 187–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Szeftel, M., “Political Graft and the Spoils System in Zambia: the State as a Resource in Itself,” Review of African Political Economy 24(1983), 4–21Google Scholar.

10 See Inter-African Network for Human Rights and Development (Afronet), Citizens for a Better Environment, and Rights and Accountability in Development (RAID), Zambia: Deregulation and the Denial of Human Rights, Submission to the OECD Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (Lusaka, Kitwe, Oxford, March 2000).

11 Public meetings are described in Powdermaker, Hortense, Copper Town: Changing Africa (New York, 1962), 116Google Scholar, and Bates, , Unions, 106–09Google Scholar.

12 Parpart, Jane L., Working-Class Wives and Collective Labor Action on the North Rhodesian Copperbelt, 1926-64 (Boston, 1982)Google Scholar; Powdermaker, Copper Town.

13 See, e.g., Times of Zambia (8 July 1981).

14 Interview with Mary Palesi, 7 March 2003.

15 Africanizing Anthropology: Fieldwork, Networks and the Making of Cultural Knowledge in Central Africa (Durham, 2001)Google Scholar.

16 Lecocq, Baz, “Fieldwork Ain't Always Fun: Public and Hidden Discourses on Fieldwork,” HA 29(2002), 273–82.

17 E.g., “Is This a New Era for Zambian trade Unions?” South African Labour Bulletin 27/2(April 2003), 64–67Google Scholar.

18 Interview with Alfred Mwaango, 17 January 2003.

19 Information on the Network is available by email: .

20 For information on the survey project, contact Dr Giacomo Macola on , or the National Archives, on .

21 Zukas, , Into Exile and Back (Lusaka, 2002)Google Scholar.

22 Sardanis, , Africa: Another Side of the Coin. Northern Rhodesia's Final Years and Zambia's Nationhood (London, 2003)Google Scholar.

23 Kaunda, , Selling the Family Silver: the Zambian Copper Mines Story (KwaZulu, Natal, 2002)Google Scholar.

24 Epstein, A.L., Politics in an Urban African Community (Manchester, 1958, 1973)Google Scholar.