Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:36:14.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WHERE WAS THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND, 1646–1660?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2018

CHRISTOPHER HAIGH
CHRISTOPHER HAIGH*
Affiliation:
Christ Church, Oxford
*
Christ Church, Oxford, ox1 1dpchristopher.haigh@history.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When parliament abolished episcopacy, cathedrals, and the Book of Common Prayer, what was left of the Church of England? Indeed, as contemporaries asked between 1646 and 1660, ‘Where is the Church of England?’ The episcopalian clergy could not agree. Some thought the remaining national framework of parishes and congregations was ‘the Church of England’, though now deformed, and worked within it. Others thought that only those ministers and parish congregations who remained loyal in heart to the church as it had been qualified as ‘the church’: most of them continued to serve a parish church and tried to keep the old practices going. A third category of hard-liners thought ‘the Church of England’ was now restricted to a recusant community that worshipped with the Prayer Book in secret and rejected the new national profession. The fundamental issue was the nature of a church: was it a society of believers, however organized, or a hierarchical institution following rules prescribed by God? The question caused tensions and distrust among the clergy, and the rigorists thought of the rest as time-servers and traitors. Disagreements continued to divide the clergy after the Restoration, and were reflected in attitudes towards concessions to dissenters.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 127 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Beaumont, Joseph, Some observations upon the Apologie of Dr Henry More for his mystery of godliness (Cambridge, 1665), pp. 175–6Google Scholar, 180. All pre-1800 works were published in London unless otherwise indicated.

2 B[ayly], T[homas], An end to controversie between the Romane Catholique and the Protestant religions justified (Douai, 1654), p. 43Google Scholar.

3 Jus divinum regiminis ecclesiastici, or The divine right of church-government asserted (1646), p. 2; Jus divinum ministerii ecclesiastici, or The divine right of the gospel ministry (1654), pt 2, sig. Aa2, pp. 5–6, 9–12.

4 [Smith, Richard], A brief survey of the lord of Derry his treatise of schism (Paris, 1655), pp. 36–7Google Scholar, 42; [Sergeant, John], Schism disarm'd of the defensive weapons lent it (Paris, 1655), p. 291Google Scholar.

5 Owen, John, Of schism: the true nature of it discovered and considered (Oxford, 1657), pp. 251–2Google Scholar; idem, A review of the true nature of schisme (Oxford, 1657), pp. 172–3Google Scholar.

6 Beaumont, Some observations, p. 181.

7 Reasons of the present judgement of the University of Oxford concerning the Solemn League and Covenant, the Negative Oath, the ordinances concerning discipline and worship ([Oxford], 1647), pp. 11, 32–3Google Scholar.

8 Barwick, Peter, The life of the Reverend Dr John Barwick (1724), pp. 539–40Google Scholar.

9 Morrill, John, ‘The church in England in the 1640s’, in idem, ed., Reactions to the English Civil War, 1642–1649 (Basingstoke, 1982), pp. 89–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Spurr, John, The Restoration Church of England, 1646–1689 (New Haven, CT, and London, 1991), pp. 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bosher, Robert S., The making of the Restoration settlement: the influence of the Laudians, 1649–1662 (London, 1951), pp. 27–30Google Scholar; Milton, Anthony, ‘Anglicanism and royalism in the 1640s’, in Adamson, John, ed., The English Civil War (Basingstoke, 2009), pp. 61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Packer, J. W., The transformation of Anglicanism, 1643–1660, with special reference to Henry Hammond (Manchester, 1969)Google Scholar.

10 Fincham, Kenneth and Taylor, Stephen, ‘Vital statistics: episcopal ordination and ordinands in England, 1646–1660’, English Historical Review, 126 (2011), pp. 319–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Fincham, Kenneth and Taylor, Stephen, ‘Episcopalian identity, 1640–1662’, in Milton, Anthony, ed., The Oxford history of Anglicanism, i (Oxford 2016), pp. 457–81Google Scholar.

12 Gauden, John, Hieraspistes: a defence by way of apology of the ministry and ministers of the Church of England (1653), sig. C3, pp. 77Google Scholar, 99, 122.

13 Sanderson, Robert, Twenty sermons formerly preached (1656)Google Scholar, sig. A3; idem, The works of Robert Sanderson (Oxford, 1854), v, pp. 39–40Google Scholar, 43–4, 47–8; idem, XXXIIII sermons (1657), sigs. C–C2, D2, F.

14 Warmstry, Thomas, Suspiria ecclesiae & reipublicae anglicanae (1648), pp. 282–3Google Scholar, 285.

15 [Hall, George], The triumphs of Rome over despised Protestantcie (1655), p. 110Google Scholar; idem, God's appearing for the tribe of Levi (1655), sig. A2, p. 8.

16 John Hacket, A century of sermons, ed. Thomas Plume (1675), p. xviii. Hacket's position is less certain, and he may belong in the next category of clergy.

17 Gauden, John, A sermon preached in the Temple-chappel, at the funeral of the Right Reverend Father in God Dr Brounrig (1660), pp. 23Google Scholar, 192–3, 228–9; Barwick, Life of the Reverend Dr John Barwick, p. 488.

18 Barwick, John, Hieronikes, or The fight, victory and triumph of S. Paul, accommodated to the Right Reverend Father in God Thomas, late lord bishop of Duresme (1660), pp. 48–9Google Scholar.

19 Symmons, Edward, A vindication of King Charles, or A loyal subject's duty (1648), pp. 306–7Google Scholar; Wodenote, Theophilus, Hermes theologus, or A divine Mercurie dispacht with a grave message (1649)Google Scholar, preface by Edward Symmons, sig. A5; Matthews, A. G., Walker revised (Oxford, 1948), p. 164Google Scholar.

20 [Samwayes, Richard], England's faithful reprover and monitour (1653), pp. 1, 42–3Google Scholar, 60–2, 72.

21 Harwood, James, The plea for the Common Prayer Book (1654)Google Scholar, sig. A3, pp. 1217, 27; idem, The Lord's Prayer unclasped (1654), sig. a3.

22 Langley, William, The persecuted minister, in defence of the ministerie (1656), pp. 8–10Google Scholar, 22–3, 49, 52, 69.

23 Watts, Jeffrey, A scribe, pharisee, hypocrite, and his letter answered (1657), pp. 14–15Google Scholar, 20. Watts seems to have retained the rectory of Great Leighs in Essex until his death in 1663.

24 Getsius, Daniel, Tears shed in the behalf of his dear mother the Church of England and her sad distractions (1658)Google Scholar, title page, p. 104.

25 Mayne, Jasper, Certain sermons and letters of defence and resolution (1653), ‘A sermon against schism’, p. 22Google Scholar.

26 B[oreman], R[obert], The triumph of learning over ignorance and truth over falsehood (1652), pp. 22–3Google Scholar, 30. Boreman had been removed from his Cambridge fellowship.

27 Raie, Clement, Gemitus plebis, or A mournful complaint and supplication (1656), pp. 8–9Google Scholar, 29.

28 Smyth, William, The safe way to glory, in several exercises of general use (1656), pp. 91–2Google Scholar, 100, 126.

29 Fuller, Thomas, The church-history of Britain (1655)Google Scholar, sig. A2; idem, Mixt contemplations in better times (1660), p. 34; idem, A triple reconciler (1654), pp. 34–6, Anon., The life of that reverend divine and learned historian Dr. Thomas Fuller (1661), pp. 86–7.

30 Harwood, Plea for the Common Prayer Book, p. 15. For the ‘national Church’, see Hughes, Ann, ‘“The public profession of these nations”: the national church in Interregnum England’, in Durston, Christopher and Maltby, Judith, eds., Religion in revolutionary England (Manchester, 2006), pp. 93–114Google Scholar.

31 Gauden, Hieraspistes, p. 105.

32 Gauden, John, A remonstrance presented to O.P. Feb. 4 1655 (1659)Google Scholar; idem, The tears, sighs, complaints and prayers of the Church of England (1659), pp. 24, 47, 50, 60.

33 For such a church, see Judith Maltby, ‘Suffering and surviving: the Civil Wars, the Commonwealth and the formation of “Anglicanism”, 1642–1660’, in Durston and Maltby, eds., Religion in revolutionary England, pp. 158–80.

34 Nicholson, William, An apology for the discipline of the ancient church, intended especially for that of our mother the Church of England (1659), ‘The copy of a letter written by a divine, a friend of the author’Google Scholar, signed J. T., sig. A2; [Jeremy Taylor], The golden grove, or a manuall of daily prayers and litanies (1655), sig. A2; idem, Unum necessarium, or The doctrine and practice of repentance (1655), sig. B4; idem, The measures and offices of friendship (2nd edn, 1657), pp. 121, 201–2.

35 Sherman, John, White salt, or A sober correction of a mad world (1654), pp. 214Google Scholar, 237.

36 M[ossom], R[obert], Sion's prospect in its first view (1651)Google Scholar, sig. *2; idem, The preachers tripartite in three books (1657), bk 3, pp. 41, 69, 139–40.

37 Hewitt, John, Prayers of intercession for those who mourn in secret for the publick calamities of this nation (1659), pp. 24Google Scholar, 72.

38 Pierce, Thomas, The Christian's rescue from the grand error of the heathen (1658), p. 4Google Scholar; idem, The new discoverer discovered: by way of an answer to Mr. Baxter his pretended discovery of the Grotian religion (1659), sigs. b, b2, pp. 8, 9, 15, 35, 44, 57, 88, 89, 104, 160, 179, 211, 214, 269; Eautontmoroumenos, or The self-revenger exemplified in Mr. William Barlee (1658), p. 95.

39 Gatford, Lionel, A petition for the vindication of the publique use of the Book of Common Prayer (1655)Google Scholar, sig. A2, pp. 34, 36.

40 Nicholson, An apology for the discipline of the ancient church, title page, pp. 2–3, passim; idem, A plain but full exposition of the catechisme of the Church of England (1655), sig. A2, pp. 6–7.

41 Pierce, The new discoverer discovered, p. 3.

42 Fincham and Taylor, ‘Vital statistics: episcopal ordination and ordinands in England, 1646–1660’, pp. 319–44; idem and idem, ‘Episcopalian identity’, pp. 474–5.

43 Fincham, Kenneth and Taylor, Stephen, ‘Episcopalian conformity and nonconformity, 1646–1660’, in McElligott, Jason and Smith, David L., Royalists and royalism during the Interregnum (Manchester, 2010), pp. 19Google Scholar, 21.

44 Morrill, ‘The church in England in the 1640s’, pp. 89–114; Maltby, Judith, ‘“The good old way”: Prayer Book Protestantism in the 1640s and 1650s’, in Swanson, R. N., ed., The church and the book (Woodbridge, 2004), pp. 233–56Google Scholar.

45 Baxter, Richard, Five disputations of church-government and worship (1659)Google Scholar, sigs. P3, R2. Cf. Maltby, ‘Suffering and surviving’, p. 167, where any significant conception of a ‘recusant Church’ is doubted.

46 Baxter, Five disputations, sig. P3.

47 Hyde, Edward, Christ and his church, or Christianity explained (1658)Google Scholar, sig. A2, pp. 429, 521, 523.

48 Swadlin, Thomas, Whether it be better to turn Presbyterian, Romane, or to continue what I am, Catholique in matter of religion (1658), pp. 8–9Google Scholar; idem, The XXXVI questions propounded for resolution of unlearned Protestants (1659), p. 16.

49 [Ferne, Henry], Episcopacy and Presbytery considered (1644), pp. 27–9Google Scholar; F[erne], H[enry], A compendious discourse upon the case (1655), pp. 12–13, 66; idem, Of the division between the English and Romish Church (1652)Google Scholar, sig. A5.

50 Hammond], [Henry, Of the power of the keyes (1647)Google Scholar, sig. A2; idem, Of fundamentals (1654), p. 239; idem, A paraenesis, or seasonable exhortatory to all true sons of the Church of England (1656), pp. 4, 50–1, 57, 184, 230; idem, Of schisme. A defence of the Church of England against the exceptions of the Romanists (1653), pp. 179, 181; idem, The disarmer's dexterities examined (1656), p. 301.

51 Boughen, Edward, An account of the Church Catholike (1653), pp. 13Google Scholar, 41; idem, Mr Geree's case of conscience sifted (1648), p. 113.

52 Heylyn, Peter, Ecclesia vindicata, or the Church of England vindicated, part second (1657)Google Scholar, sig. A3; idem, Ecclesia vindicata (1657), sig. a; idem, Theologia veterum, or the summe of Christian theologie (1654), sig. B2; idem, Certamen epistolae (1659), sig. A2.

53 [Allington, John], A brief apologie for the sequestered clergie (1649), pp. 9–10Google Scholar.

54 Bosher, Making of the Restoration settlement, pp. 49–67, 284–94; Bramhall, John, A just vindication of the Church of England (1654), p. 30Google Scholar; idem, An answer to Monsieur de la Militiere (1653), pp. 171–2; idem, A replication to the bishop of Chalcedon (1656), pp. 39–41, 109–10.

55 Steward, Richard, The English case, exactly set down by Hezekiah's reformation (1659), p. 24Google Scholar. Steward had died in 1651.

56 Wodenote, Theophilus, Eremicus theologus, or a sequestered divine (1654), pp. 129Google Scholar, 132.

57 [Brough, William], Sacred principles, services and soliliquies (1656), p. 20Google Scholar; idem, A preservative against the plague of schisme, or an antidote against the separations of the time (1652), pp. 54, 57, 60.

58 Thorndike, Herbert, A discourse of the right of the church in a Christian state (1649), pp. 235, 338–9Google Scholar; [idem], A letter concerning the present state of religion amongst us (n.p., 1656), pp. 1, 18, 20, 22. On Thorndike's ecclesiology, see Collins, Jeffrey R., The allegiance of Thomas Hobbes (Cambridge, 2005), pp. 245–54Google Scholar.

59 Thorndike, Herbert, An epilogue to the tragedy of the Church of England (1659)Google Scholar, bk 3, p. 425.

60 Barwick, The life of the Reverend Dr John Barwick, pp. 401–2.

61 Anon., Ichabod, or Five groans of the church (Cambridge, 1663), p. 29Google Scholar.

62 Ussher, James, The reduction of episcopacie unto the form of synodical government received in the ancient church (1656)Google Scholar; Hall, Joseph, The peace-maker, laying forth the right way of peace in matter of religion (1645), p. 48Google Scholar; Gauden, Hieraspistes, pp. 262–3; idem, Tears, pp. 448–9, 453, 461, 535; Spurr, Restoration Church of England, p. 26. Ussher's proposals date originally from 1641: Ford, Alan, James Ussher; theology, history and politics in early-modern Ireland and England (Oxford, 2007), pp. 240–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

63 Taylor, Jeremy, A discourse of the liberty of prophesying. Showing the unreasonableness of prescribing to other men's faith and the iniquity of persecuting differing opinions (1647)Google Scholar; idem, A collection of polemical and moral discourses (1657), sig. A3.

64 [Thorndike], A letter, p. 23; Sanderson, The works, v, p. 58.

65 Gatford, A petition, p. 62.

66 Green, I. M., The re-establishment of the Church of England, 1660–1663 (Oxford, 1978), p. 89Google Scholar; P[atrick?], S[imon], A brief account of the new sect of latitude-men (1662), pp. 3Google Scholar, 5–6.

67 Fincham, Kenneth and Taylor, Stephen, ‘The restoration of the Church of England, 1660–1662’, in Taylor, Stephen and Tapsell, Grant, eds., The nature of the English Revolution (Woodbridge, 2013), pp. 216–20Google Scholar; Fincham and Taylor, ‘Episcopalian identity’, pp. 476–8.

68 Milton, Anthony, Laudian and royalist polemic in seventeenth-century England: the career and writings of Peter Heylyn (Manchester, 2007), pp. 190–3Google Scholar; Spurr, Restoration Church of England, pp. 10–12; Packer, The transformation of Anglicanism, pp. 38–43, 183. Ferne became bishop of Chester, but Hyde, Boughen, and Steward were dead.

69 Crofton, Zachary, A serious review of presbyters re-ordination by bishops (1661), pp. 9, 12–13Google Scholar, 32–4; I. R., A peaceable enquiry into that novel controversie about reordination (1661), pp. 18, 36–43, 143. Cf. [Thorndike], A letter, pp. 1, 4–5, 18, 20.

70 For the Church of England's difficulties over comprehension, see Spurr, John, ‘The Church of England, comprehension and the Toleration Act of 1689’, English Historical Review, 104 (1989), pp. 927–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71 Stillingfleet, Edward, Irenicum. A weapon-salve for the churches wounds. Or the divine right of particular forms of church government (1661, vere 1660)Google Scholar, title page, sig. a3 and passim.

72 Ibid., pp. 156–7.

73 Ibid., pp. 27, 44, 46.

74 Quantin, Jean-Louis, The Church of England and Christian antiquity (Oxford, 2009), p. 286Google Scholar.

75 [Hammond, Henry], Considerations of present use concerning the danger resulting from the change of our church government (1644), pp. 5–7Google Scholar; [idem], Of the power of the keyes, p. 39; idem, Dissertationes quatuor, quibus episcopatus iura ex S. Scripturis et primaeua antiquitate adstruuntur (1651), sigs. C2–C4; idem, A letter of resolution to six quaeres of present use in the Church of England (1653), p. 362; idem, A vindication of the dissertations concerning episcopacie (1654), pp. 4, 159–60; idem, A paraenesis, p. 57; Packer, The transformation of Anglicanism, pp. 104–28.

76 Thorndike, A discourse of the right of the church, pp. 85, 299–300, 320–1; [idem], A letter, pp. 4, 20; idem, An epilogue to the tragedy, bk 3, p. 145.

77 Stillingfleet, Irenicum, p. 379; Hammond, Considerations, p. 12; idem, A vindication, pp. 7–8; [Thorndike], A letter, p. 18.

78 Marshall, John, ‘The ecclesiology of the Latitude-men, 1660–1689: Stillingfleet, Tillotson and “Hobbism”’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 36 (1985), pp. 408–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

79 Stillingfleet, Edward, A discourse concerning the power of excommunication in a Christian church (1662)Google Scholar; idem, Irenicum… The second edition, with an appendix concerning the power of excommunication in a Christian church (1662).

80 [Stillingfleet, Edward], Several conferences between a Romish priest, a fanatic chaplain and a divine of the Church of England (1679), pp. 148–50Google Scholar; idem, Irenicum, pp. 1, 25, 157–8, 170, 179, 181–2, 194, 314, 345, 347, 385.

81 Stillingfleet, Edward, The mischief of separation: a sermon preached at Guild-Hall chappel (1680), pp. 17Google Scholar, 19. For the controversy that followed, see Spurr, Restoration Church of England, pp. 154–8; Marshall, ‘The ecclesiology of the latitude-men’, pp. 416–21; Claydon, Tony, Europe and the making of England, 1660–1760 (Cambridge, 2007), pp. 298–300Google Scholar, 310–11. Irenicum was reprinted in 1681.

82 Edward Stillingfleet, The unreasonableness of separation (2nd edn, 1681), pp. lxxxii–iv, xciii–iv.

83 Bodleian Library, Tanner MS 36, fos. 255–6; [W Sherlock], A discourse about church-unity (1681), pp. 183, 208, 557–92.

84 Bodleian Library, Tanner MS 31, fo. 170; S[amuel] P[arker], The case of the Church of England (1681), sig. A2, pp. 117–20, 123. Parker sought to establish the foundation of episcopal authority by An account of the government of the Christian church for the first six hundred years (1683).

85 Parker had praised ‘the learned and pious Mr Thorndike’ and ‘the truly pious and learned Dr Hammond’: The case, pp. 78, 89.

86 Lowth, Simon, Of the subject of church-power (1685)Google Scholar, sig. A4. The book, like the letter, was written in 1683, but publication was held up because of its personal attack on Stillingfleet and John Tillotson.

87 Edward Stillingfleet, A sermon preached at a public ordination (1685), sig. A2.

88 [Stillingfleet], Several conferences, p. 149; idem, The unreasonableness of separation, p. lxxi.

89 Lowth, Simon, A letter to Edward Stillingfleet, D.D. (1687), pp. 23Google Scholar, 32, 54, 66–7, 79.