Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T03:04:32.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

UNDERWRITING BRITISH TRADE TO INDIA AND CHINA, 1780–1835*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2012

A. B. LEONARD*
Affiliation:
Trinity Hall, Cambridge
*
Trinity Hall, Cambridge CB2 1TJabl28@cam.ac.uk

Abstract

In the late eighteenth century, European merchants launched corporate insurance bodies in India and China. These new joint-stock companies followed London's mature and efficient institutional systems for marine insurance, and adopted their basis in the European law merchant. They operated alongside local risk transfer facilities, but in both countries were quickly embraced by native merchants, who participated both as customers and shareholders. The rapid development of a corporate insurance sector in India and China, fuelled by the capital of local merchants and members of the European colonial elite, underlines the effectiveness of premium-based marine insurance, while its swift adoption by both local and international merchants shows its importance to the development of trade and empire.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I am grateful for the help of C. A. Bayly, Martin Daunton, D'Maris Coffman, and Duncan Needham in the preparation of this article, and for the constructive input of anonymous reviewers from this journal.

References

1 Webster, Anthony, The twilight of the East India Company: the evolution of Anglo-Asian commerce and politics, 1790–1860 (Woodbridge, 2009), p. 10Google Scholar.

2 Canton Register, 19 Feb. 1829.

3 The phrase is Ward's. Ward, J. R., ‘The industrial revolution and British imperialism, 1750–1850’, Economic History Review, n.s., 47 (1994), p. 48Google Scholar.

4 Insurance transactions are noted in the ledgers of Filippo Borromei & Co.'s London branch as early as 1438. Bolton and Bruscoli's translation and tabulation are found at www.queenmaryhistoricalresearch.org/roundhouse/default.aspx. Records of dozens of disputed transactions survive in English judicial archives.

5 As, for example, in the 1693 parliamentary ‘Bill to enable divers merchants-insurers, that have sustained great losses by the present war with France, the better to satisfy their several creditors’, 9 Dec. 1693, Journal of the House of Commons, 11 (1693–7), p. 26.

6 Leone, Alfonso, ‘Maritime insurance as a source for the history of international credit in the middle ages’, Journal of European Economic History, 12 (1983), p. 367Google Scholar.

7 Ibbetson, David, ‘Law and custom: insurance in sixteenth-century England’, Journal of Legal History, 29 (2008), pp. 299301Google Scholar.

8 Insurance policy of Bartholomew Corsini (copy), 15 June 1582, London Metropolitan Archive (LMA) 062/MS22281.

9 See, for example, a policy issued to Thomas Newton, 27 Oct. 1760, underwritten in New York, LMA 063/MS32992/1, and sundry policies of insurance in the Jardine Matheson Archive, Cambridge University Library (CUL) JMA A8/96/1.

10 India Gazette, 13 July 1782.

11 Hewitt, John, Trader's pocket companion (London, 1760), pp. 113–75Google Scholar; Gibb, D. E. W., Lloyd's of London: a study in individualism (London, 1957), p. 23Google Scholar.

12 For example, by the mid-eighteenth century the Spanish flota was insured in part in London. Weskett, John, A complete digest of the theory, laws, and practice of insurance (London, 1781), p. 223Google Scholar.

13 6 Geo. 1, c. 18.

14 ‘Report from the select committee on marine insurance, 18 April 1810’, British Parliamentary Papers, 226 (1810), reprinted 11 May 1824, p. 58.

15 Ibid.

16 ‘Imports, total’, dataset in ‘East India Company: trade and domestic financial statistics’, UK data archive, SN 5690 (2007), Hew Bowen (compiler).

17 Imlah, Albert, Economic elements in the Pax Britannia (New York, NY, 1958), p. 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Habib, Irfan, ‘Potentialities of capitalistic development in the economy of Mughal India’, Journal of Economic History, 29 (1969), pp. 71–3Google Scholar.

19 Bayly, C. A., Rulers, townsmen and bazaars: north Indian society in the age of British expansion, 1770–1870 (Cambridge, 1983), p. 415Google Scholar.

20 Malcolm, John, A memoir of central India including Malwa (2 vols., London, 1832), ii, p. 93Google Scholar.

21 Paramatma Saran, ‘Insurance during medieval India’, in V. S. Srivastava, ed., Cultural contours of India (New Delhi, 1981), p. 371.

22 Subramanian, Lakshmi, Indigenous capital and imperial expansion: Bombay, Surat and the west coast (Delhi, 1996), pp. 137, 142Google Scholar; Nightingale, Pamela, Trade and empire in western India, 1784–1806 (Cambridge 1970), pp. 19, 79Google Scholar.

23 Parthasarathi, Prasannan, Why Europe grew rich, and Asia did not: global economic divergence, 1600–1800 (Cambridge, 2011), pp. 65–6Google Scholar. His source was the London Assurance, which set rates higher than private underwriters (see testimony of Simson, ‘Report from the select committee’, p. 21). Parthasathi cited John, A. H., ‘The London Assurance Company and the marine insurance market of the eighteenth century’, Economica, 25 (1958), p. 138Google Scholar.

24 Bayly, Rulers, townsmen and bazaars, p. 416.

25 The ultimate outcome is not recorded. The English factories in India, 1651–1654: a calendar of documents in the India Office, Westminster, ed. William Foster (Oxford, 1915), p. 224; ibid., 1655–1660 (1921), pp. 71–4.

26 Testimony of Angerstein, ‘Report from the select committee’, p. 58. Bulley, Anne, Bombay country ships, 1790–1833 (Richmond, 2000), pp. 188–9Google Scholar.

27 Rates here converted to decimal values were originally quoted in guineas. Drawn from an unnamed newspaper by Carey, W. H., ed., Good old days of the honourable John Company, 1600 to 1858 (2 vols., Calcutta, 1906–7), i, p. 88Google Scholar.

28 Clagett & Pratt, risk book 1807, Lloyd's Archive (LA), uncatalogued.

29 Edward Allfrey, risk book 1809, LA, uncatalogued; risk book of John Janson, 1809, British Library, Add. MSS 346730.

30 Deane, Phyllis and Cole, W. A., British economic growth, 1688–1959: trends and structure (Cambridge, 1964), p. 87Google Scholar; Davis, Ralph, The industrial revolution and British overseas trade (Leicester, 1979), p. 93Google Scholar; Greenburg, Michael, British trade and the opening of China, 1800–1842 (Cambridge, 1951), pp. 216–8Google Scholar; Tripathi, Amales, Trade and finance in the Bengal Presidency, 1793–1833 (Oxford, 1979), p. 146Google Scholar; register of the policies of the Canton Insurance Company, 2 Jan. 1816 to 31 Dec. 1817, CUL JMA A7/425. Greenburg's estimates are converted at Spanish $1 = 5s; Tripathi's at one sicca rupee = 2s 6d.

31 Return rates converted here to decimal values were quoted in guineas. Risk book of John Janson, 1809.

32 Smallwood, R. P. F., ‘The nature and structure of insurance markets in the far east’, Journal of the Chartered Insurance Institute, 59 (1962), p. 79Google Scholar.

33 Testimony of William Bridgman, ‘Report from the select committee’, p. 27.

34 India Gazette, 23 Mar. 1782.

35 Ibid., 10 Aug. 1782.

36 Hicky's Bengal Gazette; or, Calcutta General Advertiser, 20 May 1780, 21 July 1781.

37 Ibid., 20 May 1780.

38 India Gazette, 7 Sept. 1782.

39 Ibid., 13 July 1782.

40 Ibid., 27 July 1782.

41 Ibid., 20 Jan. 1781.

42 Calcutta Gazette; or, Oriental Advertiser (hereafter Calcutta Gazette), 27 Nov. 1788, 21 July 1791; India Gazette, 17 Jan. 1785, 8 Aug. 1785, 2 Oct. 1788; Calcutta Chronicle; and General Advertiser, 4 Mar. 1790; Bombay Courier, 2 May 1795, 24 July 1802.

43 See, for example, Ekelund, R. B. and Tollison, R. D., ‘Mercantilist origins of the corporation’, Bell Journal of Economics, 11 (1980), pp. 715–20Google Scholar.

44 Hobart Town Courier, 4 July 1834.

45 Asiatic Journal and Monthly Register for British and Foreign India, China, and Australasia, 20 (London, 1836), p. 71.

46 Emphasis in original. ‘Additional supplement to the Calcutta Gazette’. Calcutta Gazette, 3 Mar. 1791.

47 Testimony of John Barr, ‘Report from the select committee’, p. 30.

48 Webster, Twilight, pp. 25–8.

49 Milburn, William, Oriental commerce: containing a geographical description of the principal places in the East Indies, China, and Japan (2 vols., London, 1813), i, p. 172Google Scholar.

50 Bombay Courier, 3 Feb. 1798, 24 July 1802.

51 Singh, S. B., European agency houses in Bengal (1783–1833) (Calcutta, 1966), p. 23Google Scholar.

52 Calcutta Gazette, 27 Nov. 1788.

53 In Calcutta, the Asiatic, the Calcutta Insurance Co., the Calcutta Insurance Office, the Ganges, the Hindostan, the India, and the Phoenix; in Madras the Old Madras, the New Madras, the Carnatic, the Exchange, and the Madras Equitable. Testimony of William Russell, ‘Report from the select committee’, pp. 31–4.

54 Jardine Matheson & Co. were its Canton agents. Guha, Amalendu, ‘Parsi Seths as entrepreneurs, 1750–1850’, Economic and Political Weekly, 5 (1970), p. M107Google Scholar.

55 Ibid.

56 Bombay Courier, 7 Jan. 1809.

57 Clagett & Pratt, risk book 1807.

58 Testimony of John William Russell, ‘Report from the select committee’, pp. 33–4.

59 Harlow, Vincent, The founding of the second British empire, 1763–1793 (2 vols., London, 1964), ii, pp. 492–3Google Scholar.

60 Bombay Courier, 2 Jan. 1793.

61 Ibid., 3 Feb. 1798.

62 Rungta stated that ‘the contribution of Indians’ to corporate development in the period to 1850 at the time was ‘in no way small, except, perhaps, in the limited area of insurance, which was then concentrated in European hands’, Rungta, Radhe Shyam, The rise of business corporations in India, 1851–1900 (Cambridge, 1970), p. 19Google Scholar; Smallwood stated that the new insurers ‘were formed by British merchants with British capital’, ‘The nature and structure of insurance markets in the far east’, p. 79.

63 Bayly, C. A., Indian society and the making of the British empire (Cambridge, 1988), p. 63Google Scholar; idem, Imperial meridian: the British empire and the world, 1780–1830 (London, 1989), p. 131.

64 Bayly, Indian society, pp. 2, 35.

65 Bulley, Bombay country ships, pp. 5–6.

66 ‘Underwriting account for 1836, as arranged by Mr. Jardine, 2. Jan 1836’, CUL JMA A8/96/B1/9

67 Guha, ‘Parsi Seths’, p. M108.

68 Parkinson, C. N., Trade in the eastern seas, 1793–1813 (Cambridge, 1937), p. 336Google Scholar.

69 New Oriental register and directory for 1802, ed. J. Mathison and A. W. Mason (London, 1802).

70 A recent restatement of the gentlemanly capitalism thesis by its authors can be found in P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins, ‘Afterword: the theory and practice of British imperialism’, in Raymond E. Dumett, ed., Gentlemanly capitalism and British Imperialism: the new debate on empire (London, 1999), pp. 196–220.

71 Webster, Twilight, pp. 10–11.

72 Hereafter dollars and $ refer to Spanish dollars.

73 Letter book of Read, Beale & Co., 4 Apr. 1801, CUL JMA C/10/1b.

74 Canton Insurance Soc. to Palmer & Co., Calcutta, 29 Sept. 1820, Letter book of the 6th Canton, CUL JMA C/35/1.

75 Register of policies of the Canton Insurance Society, 2 Jan. 1816 to 31 Dec. 1817, CUL JMA A7/425.

76 Canton Register, multiple issues; quoted 19 Feb. 1829.

77 Canton Register, 2 Feb. 1831.

78 Letter book of the 10th Canton, Oct. 1835 – Dec. 1839, CUL JMA C/34/2, pp. 2–3.

79 Ibid., opening pages.

80 Canton Insurance Office to Timothy Wiggan & Co., London, 20 Oct. 1835, outward letter book, CUL JMA C/36/1 p. 2.

81 Canton Insurance Office to D. & M. Rustomjee, Canton, 21 Jan. 1837, ibid., p. 44.

82 Canton Insurance Office to Remington & Co., Bombay, 5 Oct. 1838, ibid., p. 117.

83 Canton Insurance Soc. to Palmer & Co., Calcutta, 25 Sept. 1823, letter book of the 6th Canton, CUL JMA C/35/1.

84 Notwithstanding a dismal attempt by the EIC to establish its own agency in Canton in 1782. Greenburg, British trade, pp. 24–7, 30.

85 Spence, J. D., The search for modern China (2nd edn, New York, NY, 1990), p. 130Google Scholar.

86 Canton Register, 13 Apr. 1833.

87 Register of policies of the Bombay Insurance Society, 1 Jan. 1823 to 1828, 9 Aug. 1824, CUL JMA A7/427.

88 William Jardine to Jamsetjee Jeejebhoy, Bombay, 19 July 1833, letters of William Jardine 15 June 1833 to 30 Jan. 1835, CUL JMA C4/3, p. 12.

89 Williamson, A. R.: Eastern traders: some men and ships of Jardine Matheson & Co. (Ipswich, 1976), p. 149Google Scholar.

90 William Jardine to John Macvicar, London, 16 June 1833, letters of William Jardine 15 June 1833 to 30 Jan. 1835, CUL JMA C4/3, p. 3.

91 2 Aug. 1832ff, register of policies of the Bombay Insurance Society, 1831 to 1842, CUL JMA A7/430.

92 Not to be confused with the Union Insurance Co., established Calcutta, June 1795. Canton Register, 20 Jan. 1835, 25 Feb. 1835.

93 Letter book of the 10th Canton, Oct. 1835 – Dec. 1839, CUL JMA C/35/2.

94 Ibid., opening pages.

95 Emphasis in original. Canton Insurance Soc. to Turner & Co., Canton, 29 Aug. 1836, ibid., pp. 20–1.

96 William Jardine to Robert Lyall, Calcutta, 6 June 1835, letters of William Jardine, 15 Jan. 1835–28 Feb. 1836, CUL JMA C4/4, p. 83.

97 Subramanian, Indigenous capital, pp. 16, 201–2.

98 Calcutta Gazette, 8 Sept. 1785.

99 Bayly, Rulers, townsmen and bazaars, p. 421.

100 Kling, Blair, ‘The origin of the managing agency system in India’, Journal of Asian Studies, 26 (1966) , p. 38Google Scholar.

101 V. D. Devekan, ‘Western India’, in Dharma Kumar, ed., The Cambridge economic history of India, ii: c. 1757–1970 (Cambridge, 1983), p. 342.

102 Ibid., p. 420.

103 Crothers, Glen, ‘Commercial risk and capital formation in early America: Virginia merchants and the rise of American marine insurance, 1750–1815’, Business History Review, 78 (2004), pp. 611–12, 616Google Scholar.

104 Emphasis in original. Weskett, Complete digest, p. vi.