¹ Duff, James Grant, History of the Mahrattas (London, 1826), III, 92.Google Scholar

² Sen, S., The Military System of the Marathas (Calcutta, 1928), p. 145.Google Scholar

³ Sen, S. P., The French in India (Calcutta, 1958), p. 547.Google Scholar

⁴ E.g. An Advanced History of India, by Majumdar, Raychaudhuri and Datta; The Rise and Fulfilment of British Rule in India, by Thomson and Garrett.

⁵ Cited, by Compton, Herbert, A Particular Account of the European Military Adventurers of Hindustan (London, 1892), p. 89.Google Scholar

⁶ SirSarker, Jadunath (ed.), English Records of Maratha History: The Poona Residency Correspondence (Bombay, 1936–1951), 1, 254. This series is hereafter referred to as PRC.Google Scholar

⁷ ‘Memorandum Relating to the Maratha Army’: India Office Records, Home Miscellaneous, vol. 242, f. 50.

⁸ Tone, W. H., Some Particular Institutions of the Maratha People (Bombay, 1795), p. 34.Google Scholar

⁹ Gleig, G. R., The Life of Sir Thomas Munro (London, 1830), III, 193, 199.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Gurwood, (ed.), Despatches of Wellington (London, 1837), 1, 507–8.Google Scholar

¹¹ Duff, Grant, op. cit. III, 246.Google Scholar

¹² Martineau, Alfred, Le Général Perron (Paris, 1931), p. 147Google Scholar; Fraser, J. B., Military Memoir of Lieutenant-Colonel James Skinner (London, 1850), 1, 247Google Scholar; Malcolm, J., Mernoir of Central India (London, 1824), 1, 233Google Scholar; Duff, Grant, op. cit., III, 270.Google Scholar

¹³ Sen, S.. op. cit. p. 145.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Twining, Thomas, Travels in India a Hundred Years Ago (London, 1893), p. 281.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Martin, R. M. (ed.), The Despatches of the Marquess Wellesley (London, 1836), v, 283–5.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Malcolm, , op. cit. 1, 255.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Gurwood, , op. cit. 11, 392–3.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Ibid. 1, 415.

¹⁹ Thorn, William, Memoir of the War in India (London, 1818), p. 278Google Scholar; Duke, of Wellington, (ed.), Supplementary Despatches of the Duke of Wellington (London, 1858), iv, 187.Google Scholar

²⁰ Martin, , op. cit. III, 445–6.Google Scholar

²¹ Ibid. iv, 251; Thorn, , op. cit. pp. 394–9Google Scholar; Pearse, H. W., Memoir of the Life and Services of Viscount Lake (London, 1908), pp. 338–42.Google Scholar

²² Thorn, , op. cit. p. ix,Google Scholar

²³ Sen, S., op. cit. p. 111.Google Scholar

²⁴ Moor, Edward, A Narrative of the Operations of Captain Little's Detachment (London, 1794), pp. 28, 78–9Google Scholar; Tone, , op. cit. p. 35.Google Scholar

²⁵ Smith, Lewis Ferdinand, Sketch of the … Regular Corps Formed by Europeans in the Service of the Native Princes (Calcutta, 1805), p. 62Google Scholar. Smith says that Perron raised a fifth brigade, but it appears obvious from other sources that this brigade was not under his authority but commanded independently by Brownrigg – see Perron's own account in Martineau, , op. cit. pp. 165–6Google Scholar, and Skinner's in Fraser, , op. cit. 1, 188–90Google Scholar. The number of these supplementary brigades has been variously estimated. In 1802 Col. Collins reported that there were two, commanded by Filoze and Hessing, though which of the three Filozes and which of the two Hessings he did not specify – see House of Commons Sessional Papers, 1803/4, xii, 17. Collins later reported that Perron had taken over four each of Filoze's and Hessing–s battalions – ibid. p. 22. Hessing's brigade subsequently disappeared as a result, it seems, of re-organization, and Hessing was appointed to the command of one of the brigades under Perron.

²⁶ Smith, , op. cit. p. 77Google Scholar; Thorn, , op. cit. p. 78Google Scholar; Compton, , op. cit. pp. 87, 388.Google Scholar

²⁷ These figures, save for the artillery and brigade cavalry, are Perron's own – see Martineau, , op. cit. p. 165Google Scholar. The artillery and cavalry figures are from an earlier return of De Boigne's brigades, PRC, 1, 392–4, and Smith, , op. cit. pp. 62–3. Col. Collins reported in April and May 1802 that Perron was striving to increase each brigade to ten battalions of 716 firelocks, but that the battalions were ‘very incomplete’ at that time – Sessional Papers, 1803/4, xii, 17–22.Google Scholar

²⁸ Stuart, a deserter from Sindia's service, gave the number as four or five battalions from Brownrigg's and four for Filoze's. He reckoned the guns at three per battalion – see Selections from the Nagpur Residency Records (Nagpur, 1950), 1, 374. This series is hereafter referred to as SNRR.Google Scholar

²⁹ Stuart's information: loc. cit. 374; Collins's information: Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 253.Google Scholar

³⁰ Martineau, , op. cit. pp. 165–6.Google Scholar

³¹ PRC, v, 34; Tone, , op. cit. p. 30.Google Scholar

³² Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 253.Google Scholar

³³ Fraser, , op. cit. 1, 198–9Google Scholar; Smith, , op. cit. p. 77Google Scholar; Compton, , op. cit. pp. 87, 337–419. Harding was killed at Poona and replaced by Dodd.Google Scholar

³⁴ See Smith, , op. cit. p. 77Google Scholar. It appears from the memoirs of Amir Khan that Afghan horse were attached to Dudrenec's original brigade – Baswan Lal (trans. Prinsep), Memoirs of the Patkan Soldier of Fortune (Calcutta, 1832), p. 109.Google Scholar

³⁵ Malcolm, , op. cit. 1, 238Google Scholar; Martin, , op. cit. v, 293.Google Scholar

³⁶ Smith, , op. cit. pp. 62Google Scholar, 86; Tone, , op. cit. p. 28Google Scholar; Col. Murray, to Dundas, H., 15 May 1794: Home Miscellaneous Records, vol. 388, ff. 75–83.Google Scholar

³⁷ Moor, , op. cit. p. 83Google Scholar; Tone, , op. cit. p. 33. The Company later reduced this supply by adopting the policy of returning unserviceable arms to Europe.Google Scholar

³⁸ Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 553Google Scholar; Thorn, , op. cit. p. 307.Google Scholar

³⁹ Martin, , op. cit. III, 313.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Ibid. pp. 443, 445.

⁴¹ Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 390.Google Scholar

⁴² de Saint-Genis, Victor, Le Général Comte De Boigne (Poitiers, 1873), pp. 203–4.Google Scholar

⁴³ Calcutta Chronicle, 29 July 1790: cited in Compton, , op. cit. p. 53.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 419Google Scholar; Thorn, , op. cit. pp. 116–18, 190, 232–3, 398–9.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ SNRR, 1, 37.

⁴⁶ Martin, , op. cit. III, 445Google Scholar; Stubbs, F. W., History of the Bengal Artillery (London, 1877), III, 535.Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Blakiston, J., Twelve Years' Military Adventure London1819Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Thorn, , op. cit. p. 410Google Scholar; Stubbs, op. cit. 1, 262.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Fraser, , op. cit. 1, 132–5, 172–3, 230.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Thorn, , op. cit. pp. 377–9Google Scholar; Pearse, , op. cit. pp. 3048.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Martin, , op. cit. III, 445.Google Scholar

⁵² Ibid. 11, 42, 6223; Stubbs, , op. cit. III, 5324. The number of officers actually available for service in Bengal was only 33 out of 126.Google Scholar

⁵³ See Stubbs, , op. cit. III, 50110. The Maratha artillerists enlisted by Lake in 1804 ordered to be disbanded by the Court of Directors first in 1814 and again in 1817 – Military Letter to Bengal, 7 Jan. 1817, paras. 50–1: India Office Records.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Carey, W. H.. The Good Old Days of Honorable John Company (Simla, 1887)Google Scholar, Stark, H. A., Hostages to India (Calcutta, 1936), pp. 57–8.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Information of Stuart: SNRR 1, 376.

⁵⁶ Longford, Elizabeth, Wellington: The Years of the Sword (London, 1971), p. 333.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Lake, Edward, The Sieges of the Madras Army (London, 1828), p. 210.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Martin, , op. cit. iv, 242.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ They were at a distance of 700 yards. E. Lake reckoned that no breaching battery should be more than 150 yards from its target – op. cit. p. 231.

⁶⁰ The best account of the siege of Bharatpur is in Stubbs, , op. cit. 1, 265–88.Google Scholar

⁶¹ The sieges of Seringapatam, in 1792 and 1799, demonstrate this. For details see Vibart, H. M., The History of the Madras Engineers and Pioneers (London, 1881), 1, passim.Google Scholar

⁶² Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 305.Google Scholar

⁶³ Ibid. 1, 550–4.

⁶⁴ Gleig, , op. cit. III, 199.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Sen, S., op. cit. p. 125.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Martin, , op. cit. v, 293. See also iv, 199–202.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Ibid. 1, 137–42, 202.

⁶⁸ Gurwood, , op. cit. 11, 361.Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Wellington, , op. cit. iv, 216.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Bengal Military Consultations, 16 April 1811, nos. 36, 37: India Office Records. Commissariats on the same pattern were established in Bombay and Madras in 1810.

⁷¹ Horsford, ‘Memoirs on Artillery’ (MS/15): Royal Artillery Institution, Woolwich. Wellesley's complaints fully substantiate this picture. See Wellington, , op. cit. 1, 433Google Scholar; iv, 214–17. The proportion of drivers with the Mysore bullocks was one to three-ibid, iv, 217.

⁷² PRC, 1, 392–3; Smith, , op. cit. p. 63.Google Scholar

⁷³ Martin, , op. cit. II, 445–6Google Scholar. Wellesley used 22 bullocks per gun and tumbril – Gurwood, , op. cit. ii, 75 fn.Google Scholar

⁷⁴ PRC, v, 37.

⁷⁵ Tone, , op. cit. p. 38.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Sen, S., op. cit. pp. 75, 172.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Duff, Grant, op. cit. 11, 239Google Scholar; Sen, S., op. cit. pp. 78–9.Google Scholar

⁷⁸ PRC, v, 33–7; Thorn, , op. cit. p. 306.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Sessional Papers, 1803/4, xii 532.

⁸⁰ See especially Martin, , op. cit. III, 216, 221.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Personal Records, vol. 6, ff. 95–8.

⁸² The Personal Records list, which was compiled some time after 1811, contains 79 names, of which 60 are shown as belonging to commissioned officers. To these can be added Lt. Lucan, who came over to the British and was killed during Monson's retreat; nine officers from those mentioned by Wellesley as fighting against the British at Assaye (Wellington, , op. cit. iv, 190)Google Scholar; eight of the officers on the earlier pension list given by Smith, (op. cit. p. 61)Google Scholar; the three officers executed by Holkar in 1804 and four officers serving Sindia not mentioned elsewhere (gleaned from Compton, op. cit., Appendix); Perron himself; and the four officers who surrendered with Bourquin at Delhi (ibid. p. 314). This total of 91 commissioned officers must include almost all those with the Marathas on the eve of the war. Even at full strength Perron's four brigades would have contained no more than 104 officers, and we know from Perron's own account that the officer quota was incomplete (Martineau, , op. cit. p. 166). The other brigades had a much smaller officer component. An idea of the depleted state of the commissioned ranks in Sindia's brigades is given by Stuart, who stated that there were, including himself, only fifteen (out of a possible twenty-six) officers with the first brigade. He recollected ten in the fourth and only four in Brownrigg's brigade – SNRR, 1, 374–7.Google Scholar

⁸³ Perron confirms that ‘the greater part of the majors, captains and lieutenants were English or the natural sons of Englishmen by native women’ – Martineau, , op. cit., p. 166Google Scholar. In his unofficial correspondence the governor-general acknowledged that most of Sindia's officers were British, and that they were ‘much more favourable to the British than the French interests': Ingram, E. (ed.), Two Views of British India (Bath, 1970), p. 28.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Wellington, , op. cit. iv, 130.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Sessional Papers, 1803/4, XII, 213, 216, 532–4.

⁸⁸ Smith, , op. cit. p. 60.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Fraser, , op. cit. pp. 129–30, 171, 302–3.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Martin, , op. cit. III, 401–3. Dudrenec was reviled as a renegade throughout northern India. He had already deserted both Kasi Rao Holkar and Jaswant Rao Holkar-Martineau, op. cit. p. 78 and fn.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Smith, , op. cit. pp. 58–9Google Scholar; Fraser, , op. cit. 1, 190.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Martineau, , op. cit. pp. 166–7; information of Stuart: SNRR, 1, 337.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Fraser, , op. cit. 1, 250–4Google Scholar; Martin, , op. cit. III, 285.Google Scholar

⁹² Information of Stuart: SNNR, 1, 375–6. Stuart heard that Pohlman was not present at the battle of Assaye and that the brigade was commanded by his deputy, Major Dorson, who was killed. This information is suspect, since Dorson was not killed. His name appears in the Personal Records list.

⁹³ Compton, , op. cit. p. 379.Google Scholar

⁹⁴ Martineau, , op. cit. p. 174.Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Martin, , op. cit. III, 291, 293.Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Ibid, III, 393–6, 400.

⁹⁷ Ibid, III, 446.

⁹⁸ Compton, , op. cit. p. 318.Google Scholar m Sessional Papers, 1803/4, XII, 17, 534; Tone, , op. cit. p. 33.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ Cadell, patrick, History of the Bombay Army (London, 1938), p. 14.Google Scholar

¹⁰¹ Barat, Amiya, The Bengal Native Infantry (Calcutta, 1962), pp. 35–8.Google Scholar

¹⁰² Cardew, F. G., A Sketch of the Services of the Bengal Native Army (Calcutta, 1903), p. 56Google Scholar. The injunction, of course, remained a dead letter. The trouble seems to have been caused by the high cost of grain in the Carnatic, which was rice country. The Bengal troops were grain-eaters, and consequently found their pay inadequate for subsistence in Madras. See Dodwell, H., Sepoy Recruitment in the Old Madras Army (Calcutta, 1922), pp. 36–7.Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Martin, , op. cit. v, 291.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ Ibid. iii, 312.

¹⁰⁵ Ibid. iii, 396.

¹⁰⁶ Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 533.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ Martin, , op. cit. v. 181.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁸ Pearse, , op. cit. p. 385.Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Cunningham, J., History of the Sikhs (reprint, Delhi, 1955), p. 155.Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Gleig, , op. cit. III, 199.Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Sen, S., op. cit. p. 125.Google Scholar

¹¹² Smith, , op. cit. p. 177Google Scholar; information of Collins: Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 253. Lake estimated Holkar's horse in 1804 at 10,000; but this tallies with no other estimate. Malcolm's figure of 66,000 (op. cit. 1, 238) would include Pindaris and the cavalry reckoned to have come over from Sindia. The latter amounted to 15,000 men according to information obtained by Malcolm shortly after the war – see PRC, x, 214. All these estimates exclude the cavalry attached to the regular brigades, with which this part of the discussion is not concerned.Google Scholar

¹¹³ Duff, Grant, op. cit. III, 235.Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ PRC, x, 214–5.

¹¹⁵ Tone, , op. cit. p. 23.Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ Ibid. p. 24; Moor, , op. cit. p. 95.Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ George Watt, A Dictionary of the Economic Products of India, iv, s.v. ‘Horses’; Broughton, T. D., Letters from a Maratha Camp (London, 1813), pp. 45–6.Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Gleig, , op. cit. III, 57.Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Addington, R. A., ‘Notes on the Remounting of the Madras Cavalry in the Days of the Company Bahadur’ & ‘Remounting of the Madras Cavalry’: Cavalry Journal, xvii (1927), 80–6; xix (1929), 580–8. A study of the history of horse breeding and trading in India is badly needed.Google Scholar

¹²⁰ Moor, , op. cit. p. 224Google Scholar; Blacker, E. V., Memoir of the Operations … in the Maratha War of 1817, 1818 and 1819 (London, 1821), p. 21.Google Scholar

¹²¹ Tone, , op. cit. pp. 22–3; Memorandum by Malet: Home Miscellaneous Records, vol. 242, ff. 30–1. The state cavalry also contained bargirs, since officers would mount followers of their own and contract with the government for the services of a troop. This practice prevailed in the silahdar regiments raised by the Company, until abolished in 1840.Google Scholar

¹²² Figures from the official returns, printed in Thorn, op. cit.

¹²³ SirFortescue, John, A History of the British Army (London, 1921), v, 67.Google Scholar

¹²⁴ Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 391.Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Gleig, , op. cit. 1, 120.Google Scholar

¹²⁶ Home Miscellaneous Records, vol. 242, f. 43.

¹²⁷ Nolan, L. E., Cavalry: Its History and Tactics (London, 1853), P. 61.Google Scholar

¹²⁸ Fullarton, William, A View of the English Interests in India (London, 1787), pp. 55, 223–4.Google Scholar

¹²⁹ ‘Memorandum Relating to the Sources Whence Horses Were Formery Procured for this Establishment’: Nugent MSS, Library of the Royal United Services Institution, London.

¹³⁰ Fraser, , op. cit. 11, 45.Google Scholar

¹³¹ Wellington, , op. cit. III, 432.Google Scholar

¹³² Minute of Evidence taken before the Select Committee of the House of Commons (printed by order of the Court of Directors, London, 1833), v, 161Google Scholar, 172; Stubbs, , op. cit. 1, 251.Google Scholar

¹³³ Home Miscellaneous Records, vol. 242, f. 35.

¹³⁴ Report of Sir George Nugent: Bengal Secret Consultations, 6 August 1813.no. 4, para. 43: India Office Records. See also Minutes of Evidence, v, 80Google Scholar; Thorn, , op. cit. pp. 84–5.Google Scholar

¹³⁵ Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 67–73Google Scholar; Wellington, , op. cit. 1, 290 ff.Google Scholar

¹³⁶ Gleig, , op. cit. III, 192.Google Scholar

¹³⁷ Gurwood, , op. cit. 1, 528–31.Google Scholar

¹³⁸ Stubbs, , op. cit. 1, 251Google Scholar. For Lake's account see Martin, , op. cit. v, 296–9.Google Scholar

¹³⁹ Thorn, , op. cit. p. 447.Google Scholar

¹⁴⁰ Details in Stubbs, , op. cit. IIIGoogle Scholar, 550ff.; Hughes, B. P., The Bengal Horse Artillery (London, 1971), passim.Google Scholar

¹⁴¹ Gurwood, , op. cit. 11, 364. The Marathas had no horse artillery, save a few gallopers with Perron's brigade of regular cavalry – Sessional Papers, 1803/4, xii, 22.Google Scholar