¹ Ives, E. W., The common lawyers of pre-reformation England: Thomas Kebell: a case study (Cambridge, 1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Faction in Tudor England (1979; 2nd edn, 1986); ‘Faction at the court of Henry VIII: the fall of Anne Boleyn’, History, LVII (1972), 169–88Google Scholar (there are differences of emphasis between this article and reviewed here).

² Walker, G., “‘Baytyngg the Bochers dogg”: the satires of John Skelton against Cardinal Wolsey as a source of the politics of the 1520s’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, 1985Google Scholar; John Skelton and the politics of the 1520s (Cambridge, forthcoming, 1988)Google Scholar.

³ Contrast Bernard, G. W., War, taxation and rebellion in early Tudor England: Henry VIII, Wolsey and the Amicable Grant of 1525 (Brighton, 1986), pp. 76–95Google Scholar.

⁴ Bernard, G. W., ‘The pardon of the clergy reconsidered’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, XXXVII (1986), 263Google Scholar, 275–6, 280; Gwyn, P.J., ‘Faction and the fall of Wolsey?’, paper read at the University of Southampton, 5 02 1987Google Scholar; Gunn, S.J., ‘The life and career of Charles Brandon, duke of Suffolk, c. 1484–1545’, D.Phil, thesis, University of Oxford, 1986, pp. 158–73Google Scholar; Charles Brandon, duke of Suffolk (Oxford, forthcoming 1988)Google Scholar.

⁵ Starkey, D. R., ‘The king's privy chamber 1485–1547’. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1973Google Scholar; ‘Representation through intimacy: a study in the symbolism of monarchy and court life in early modern England’, in Lewis, I. M., (ed.), Symbols and sentiments (1977), pp. 197–224Google Scholar; ‘From feud to faction: English politics c. 1450–1550’, History Today, XXXII (11. 1982), 16–22Google Scholar.

⁶ Starkey, D. R., ‘Privy secrets: Henry VIII and the Lords of the Council’, History Today, XXXVII (08 1987), 23–31Google Scholar; ‘Reform in theory and in practice 1450–1540’ and ‘Winners or losers? The aristocracy, ideology and the establishment of the Tudor privy council’, papers read at the Institute of Historical Research, 5 Mar. 1984 and 8 Dec. 1986.

⁷ Gunn, , ‘Life and career of Charles Brandon’, pp. 179–84Google Scholar.

⁸ Elton, G. R., ‘Thomas Cromwell's decline and fall’, Cambridge Historical Journal, x (1950–1952), 150–85Google Scholar, reprinted in Studies in Tudor and Stuart politics and government (Cambridge, 3 vols., 1974–83), I, 189–230; ‘Politics and the Pilgrimage of Grace’, in Malament, B., (ed.), After the reformation: essays in honour of J.H.Hexter(Pennsylvania, 1980), pp. 25–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar, reprinted in Studies, III, 183–215 (Cf. Davies, C. S. L., ‘Popular religion and the Pilgrimage of Grace’, in Fletcher, A. J. and Stevenson, J., eds., Order and disorder in early modem England 1500–1750 (Cambridge, 1985), pp. 58–91Google Scholar, and, on particular noblemen, Bernard, G. W., The power of the early Tudor nobility: a study ofthe fourth and fifth earls of Shrewsbury (Brighton, 1985), pp. 30–58Google Scholar; Hoyle, R. W., ‘The first earl of Cumberland: a reputation reassessed’; Northern History, XXII (1986), 63–94Google Scholar, and ‘Thomas Master's narrative of the Pilgrimage of Grace’, Northern History, XXI (1985), 53–79Google Scholar; Gunn, S. J., ‘The rising in Lincolnshire’, paper for the conference on the Pilgrimage of Grace (at Beverley in 09 1986)Google Scholar.

⁹ Guy, J. A., The Cardinal's court: the impact of Thomas Wolsey in Star Chamber (Hassocks, 1977)Google Scholar; cf. Davies, C. S. L., English Historical Review, XCIII (1978), 397–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

¹⁰ Dietz, B., History, LXXII (1987), 338Google Scholar.

¹¹ Elton, G. R.The Tudor resolution in government (Cambridge, 1953)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, the conclusions of which are usefully summarized in England under the Tudors (1955) ch. vii. For the Debates see Wernham, R. B., English Historical review, LXXI (1955), 92–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harriss, G. L. and Williams, P. H., ‘A revolution in Tudor history?’, Past and Present, XXV (1963), 3–58Google Scholar; G. R. Elton, ‘The Tudor revolution; a reply’, ibid. (1964), 26–49; G. L. Harriss and P. H. Williams, ‘A revolution in Tudor history?’, ibid. XXXI (1965), 87–96; G. R. Elton, ‘A revolution in Tudor history?’, ibid. XXXI (1965), 103–9.

¹² Davies, C. S. L., ‘Gathering and use of information c. 1450–1660’, paper for St Peterst College, Oxford, conference 04 1987Google Scholar.

¹³ Lock, P. W., ‘Officeholders and officeholding in early Tudor England c. 1520–1540’, Ph.D. thesis, University of Exeter, 1976Google Scholar; Robertson, M. L., ‘Thomas Cromwell's servants: the ministerial I household in early Tudor government and society’, Ph.D. thesis, 1975. University of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar, Los Angeles.

¹⁴ Catto, J., Sunday Times, 05 1972Google Scholar.

¹⁵ Williams, P. H., The Tudor regime (Oxford, 1979)Google Scholar.

¹⁶ Bernard, , Power of the early Tudor nobility, pp. 185–97Google Scholar.

¹⁷ Davies, C. S. L., English Historical Review, CII (1987), 413Google Scholar.

¹⁸ Guy, J. A., The public career of Sir Thomas More (Brighton, 1980), pp. 151–56Google Scholar; ‘The Tudor commonwealth: revising Thomas Cromwell’, Historical Journal, XXIII (1980), 684–7Google Scholar. It is worth noting in passing some inconsistency in Guy's account of the emergence of the royal supremacy: in these works and in those discussed in the review, Christopher St German is given a prominent part in its making; in ‘Henry VIII and the praemunire manoeuvres of 1530–31’, English Historical Review, XCVII (1982), 481–503Google Scholar, the royal supremacy is seen as an accidental product of Henry's desire to secure a financial grant from the clergy in early 1531 (but cf. my ‘The pardon of the clergy reconsidered’, art. cit., n. 4 above); while in ‘Thomas Cromwell and the intellectual origins of the Henrician Revolution’, in Reassessing the Henrician age, Guy pursues the royal supremacy back to the early years of Henry VII's reign.

¹⁹ Elton, G. R., Reform and renewal (Cambridge, 1973), pp 71–4Google Scholar.

²⁰ Plucknett, T. F. T and Barton, J. L. (eds.), St German's ‘Doctor and student’, Selden Society, XCI (1974). 327Google Scholar.

²¹ Ibid.p. 328.

²² Ibid.p. 317.

²³ , C.Haigh ‘introduction’ ‘The recent histrography of the English reformation’, in The English Reformation revised (Cambridge, 1987), pp. I–33, 56–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Scarisbrick, J. J., The reformation and the English people (Oxford, 1984)Google Scholar.

²⁴ Ramsay, G.D., ‘A saint in the city: Thomas More at Mercers'Hall, London’, English Historical Review, XCVII (1982), 269–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁵ Guy, Public career of Sir Thomas More.

²⁶ Derrett, J. D. M. ‘The trial of sir Thomos More’ in English Historical Review, LXXIX (1964), pp. 446–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

²⁷ Trevor-Roper, H., ‘sir Thomas More and ulopia’, in renaissance Essays (1985), PP. 24–58Google Scholar.

²⁸ Fenlon, D., ‘Sir Thomas More and tyranny’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History, XXXVI (1985), 535–69Google Scholar.

²⁹ Bradshaw, B., ‘The controversial Thopmas More’ journal of Ecclesiastical History, XXXVI (1985), 152–5Google Scholar.

³⁰ Elton, G. R., English History review, LXXXIX (1974), 382–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; XCIII (1978), 399–404 (both reprinted in Studies, III, 444–50, 454–60); XCVIII (1983), 152–5.

³¹ Dowling, M., ‘Ann e Boleyn an d reform’ Journal of Ecclesiastical History, XXXV (1984), pp.30–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; ‘Humanist support for Katherine of Aragon’, Bulletin of the Institute of Historical Research, LVII 46–55Google Scholar.

³² McConica, J. K., English humanists and Reformation politics under Henry VIII and Edward VI (Oxford, 1965)Google Scholar.

³³ Gunn, , ‘Life and Carrer of Charles Brandon’, pp. 69–70, 86–8Google Scholar.