Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T03:46:30.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

NEGOTIATING FREE WILL: HYPNOSIS AND CRIME IN EARLY TWENTIETH-CENTURY GERMANY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2017

ANTHONY D. KAUDERS
ANTHONY D. KAUDERS*
Affiliation:
Keele University
*
History, Humanities Office, Keele University, Keele, st5 5bga.d.kauders@keele.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The history of free will has yet to be written. With few exceptions, the literature on the subject is dominated by legal and philosophical works, most of which recount the ideas of prominent thinkers or discuss hypothetical questions far removed from specific historical contexts. The following article seeks to redress the balance by tracing the debate on hypnosis in Germany from 1894 to 1936. Examining responses to hypnosis is tantamount to recording common understandings of autonomy and heteronomy, self-control and mind control, free will and automaticity. More specifically, it is possible to identify distinct philosophical positions related to the question as to whether hypnosis could surmount free will or not. The article demonstrates that the discourse often centred on the perceived struggle, located within a particular ‘personality’, between an individual's ‘character’ or ‘soul’ and the infiltration by a foreign or hostile force. While one group (compatibilists) emphasized the resilience of the ‘moral inhibitions’, another group (determinists) doubted that these were sufficient to withstand hypnosis.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 1047 - 1069
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Schrenck-Notzing, Albert von, ‘Thatbestand: Nach vorliegenden Berichten bearbeitet von Dr. Freiherrn von Schrenck-Notzing’, in Der Prozeß Czynski: Thatbestand desselben und Gutachten über Willensbeschränkung durch hypnotisch-suggestiven Einfluß abgegeben vor dem oberbayerischen Schwurgericht zu München (Stuttgart, 1895), pp. 1–44 Google Scholar, here pp. 3–5. The Czynski case was commented on extensively in the United States, especially in connection with similar trials in Iowa and elsewhere. See Laurence, Jean-Roch and Perry, Campbell, Hypnosis, will, and memory: a psycho-legal history (New York, NY, and London, 1988), p. 278Google Scholar.

2 Valverde, Mariana, Diseases of the will: alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom (Cambridge, 2008)Google Scholar; Smith, Roger, Free will and the human sciences (London, 2013)Google Scholar.

3 See, for example, Dilman, Ilham, Free will: an historical and philosophical introduction (London and New York, NY, 1999)Google Scholar; Watson, Gary, ed., Free will (Oxford, 2003)Google Scholar; Kane, Robert, ed., The Oxford handbook of free will (Oxford and New York, NY, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harris, James A., Of liberty and necessity: the free will debate in eighteenth-century British philosophy (Oxford, 2008)Google Scholar; Frede, Michael, A free will: origins of the notion in ancient thought (Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, and London, 2011)Google Scholar; Fuchs, Thomas and Schwarzkopf, Grit, eds., Verantwortlichkeit – nur eine Illusion? (Heidelberg, 2010)Google Scholar; Lampe, Ernst-Joachim, Pauen, Michael, and Roth, Gerhard, eds., Willensfreiheit und rechtliche Ordnung (Frankfurt am Main, 2008)Google Scholar; Pauen, Michael and Roth, Gerhard, Freiheit, Schuld und Verantwortung: Grundzüge einer naturalistischen Theorie der Willensfreiheit (Frankfurt am Main, 2008)Google Scholar. For a philosophical account that incorporates history and fiction, see Bieri, Peter, Das Handwerk der Freiheit: Über die Entdeckung des eigenen Willens (Munich, 2001)Google Scholar. Hypnosis was not the only subject that raised questions about the nature of free will. It would require a separate article, however, to address the way in which experts discussed the relationship between, say, alcohol abuse and free will. As will become clearer in the following pages, the connection between middle-class values and the exercise of free will might be assumed to have influenced discourse on this matter as well.

4 See also Winter, Alison, Memory: fragments of modern history (Chicago, IL, and London, 2012)Google Scholar; Carruthers, Susan L., Cold War captives: imprisonment, escape, and brainwashing (Berkeley, CA, Los Angeles, CA, and London, 2009)Google Scholar; Genter, Robert, ‘“Hypnotizzy” in the Cold War: the American fascination with hypnotism in the 1950s’, Journal of American Culture, 29 (2006), pp. 154–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See Dilman, Free will, p. 79; Mele, Alfred, ‘Psychology and free will: a commentary’, in Baer, John, Kaufman, James C., and Baumeister, Roy F., eds., Are we free? Psychology and free will (New York, NY, and Oxford, 2008), pp. 325–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 327; Roderick M. Chisholm, ‘Human freedom and the self’, in Watson, ed., Free will, pp. 26–37, here p. 27; Thomas Nagel, ‘Freedom’, in Watson, ed., Free will, pp. 229–56, here pp. 240–1; T. M. Scanlon, ‘The significance of choice’, in Watson, ed., Free will, pp. 352–71, here pp. 355–6.

6 Wegner, Daniel M., The illusions of conscious will (London and Cambridge, 2003), p. 272Google Scholar; McConkey, Kevin M., ‘Generations and landscapes of hypnosis: questions we've asked, questions we should ask’, in Nash, Michael R. and Barnier, Amanda J., eds., The Oxford handbook of hypnosis: theory, research, and practice (Oxford and New York, NY, 2008), pp. 53–7Google Scholar, here p. 54; Peter, Burkhard, ‘Therapeutisches Tertium und  hypnotische Rituale’, in Revenstorf, Dirk and Peter, Burkhard, eds., Hypnose in Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Medizin: Manual für die Praxis (Heidelberg, 2009), pp. 69–77 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Dirk Revenstorf and Burkhard Peter, ‘Kontraindikationen, Bühnenhypnose und Willenlosigkeit’, in idem and idem, eds., Hypnose, pp. 128–45, here p. 142.

7 Mele, ‘Psychology and free will’, p. 326.

8 Balaguer, Mark, Free will (Cambridge, MA, and London, 2014), p. 12Google Scholar.

9 Balaguer, Mark, Free will as an open scientific problem (Cambridge, MA, 2010)Google Scholar; Mele, Alfred R., Free will: why science hasn't disproved free will (Oxford and New York, NY, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Balaguer, Free will as an open scientific problem, pp. 19–20; Carol S. Dweck and Daniel C. Molden, ‘Self-theories: the construction of free will’, in Baer, Kaufmann, and Baumeister, eds., Are we free?, pp. 44–64, here pp. 57–8.

11 Kane, Robert, A contemporary introduction to free will (Oxford and New York, NY, 2005), pp. 53–4Google Scholar.

12 Keil, Geert, Willensfreiheit (Berlin and Boston, MA, 2013), pp. 97, 107Google Scholar; Georg Mohr, ‘Welche Freiheit braucht das Strafrecht?’, in Lampe, Pauen, and Roth, eds., Willensfreiheit, pp. 72–96, here p. 72.

13 Kane, A contemporary introduction to free will, pp. 19, 93; Michael Pauen, ‘Freiheit, Schuld und Strafe’, in Lampe, Pauen, and Roth, eds., Willensfreiheit, pp. 41–71, here pp. 50–1; Bieri, Das Handwerk der Freiheit, pp. 52–3; Thomas Fuchs, ‘Personale Freiheit: Ein libertarisches Freiheitskonzept auf der Grundlage verkörperter Subjektivität’, in Fuchs and Schwarzkopf, eds., Verantwortlichkeit, pp. 203–28, here p. 219.

14 German thinking on free will was heavily indebted to Immanuel Kant's libertarian concepts of autonomy and Gesinnung (good will). According to the philosopher, laws of nature were imposed upon us from outside, whereas obeying the moral law was to be self-legislating and therefore not subject to the constraints of space and time. Good will, Kant had affirmed, was responsible for moral action and impervious to external influence. This concept of Gesinnung had had a huge impact on the country's legal system, permitting the state to combine Kant with the Christian concept of the fall of man (Sündenfall) to classify felons as moral sinners. Even the worst of circumstances, including abject poverty, could not detract from the will to do good or evil. See Becker, Peter, Verderbnis und Entartung: Eine Geschichte der Kriminologie des 19. Jahrhunderts als Diskurs und Praxis (Göttingen, 2000), pp. 44–9, 366–7Google Scholar.

15 Kane, A contemporary introduction to free will, pp. 93–4; Scanlon, ‘The significance of choice’, pp. 355–6; Chisholm, ‘Human freedom and the self’, p. 27; Glover, Jonathan, Alien landscapes: interpreting disordered minds (Cambridge, MA, 2014), pp. 263–4Google Scholar.

16 Quoted in Laurence and Perry, Hypnosis, will, and memory, p. 204. For similar debates in Europe, see, for example, Harris, Ruth, Murders and madness: medicine, law, and society in the fin de siècle (Oxford, 1989)Google Scholar; Pick, Daniel, Svengali's web: the alien enchanter in modern culture (New Haven, CT, and London, 2000)Google Scholar; Gallini, Clara, La sonnambula meravigliosa: magnetismo e ipnotismo nell'Ottocento italiano (Rome, 2013)Google Scholar; Gauld, Alan, A history of hypnotism (Cambridge, 1992), ch. 22Google Scholar.

17 Dierks, Manfred, Thomas Manns Geisterbaron: Leben und Werk des Freiherrn Albert von Schrenck-Notzing (Gießen, 2012)Google Scholar; Moll, Albert, Der Hypnotismus mit Einschluß der Psychotherapie und der Hauptmerkmale des Okkultismus (Berlin, 1924)Google Scholar; Lilienthal, Karl von, ‘Der Hypnotismus und das Strafrecht’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 7 (1887), pp. 281–394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here pp. 346–7; Forel, August, Der Hypnotismus oder die Suggestion und die Psychotherapie: Ihre psychologische, parapsychologische und medizinische Bedeutung (Stuttgart 1911), pp. 269–70Google Scholar. The book was first published in 1889.

18 Schrenck-Notzing, ‘Thatbestand’, pp. 4–5. Schrenck-Notzing quoted from the Augusbuger Abendzeitung and Munich's Neueste Nachrichten.

19 Ibid., pp. 9, 15, 16.

20 Ibid., p. 44.

21 James Braid coined the term hypnotism and challenged the fluidist position whereby a universal fluid or medium brought about a hypnotic state. He also laid claim to the invention of induction through eye fixation.  See Pintar, Judith and Lynn, Steven Jay, Hypnosis: a brief history (Chichester, 2008), pp. 43–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gauld, Hypnotism, pp. 279–88.

22 W. Preyer, ‘Aerztliches Gutachten’, in Der Prozeß Czynski, pp. 90–102, here pp. 94, 95.

23 Ibid., pp. 98, 99.

24 Professor Dr Grashey (Obermedicinalrath), ‘Aerztliches Gutachten’, in Der Prozeß Czynski, pp. 45–58, here p. 47.

25 Ibid., pp. 47–8.

26 Ibid., pp. 48, 52, 53, 57.

27 Kreuter, Alma, Deutschsprachige Neurologen und Psychiater: Ein biographisch-bibliographisches Lexikon von den Vorläufern bis zur Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts (Munich, 1996), p. 578Google Scholar.

28 Professor Hirt (Breslau), ‘Aerztliches Gutachten’, in Der Prozeß Czynski, pp. 59–66, here p. 61. In this respect, he agreed with Liébeault and Bernheim (against Liégeois) that very few persons could become automata in the hands of a hypnotist. See Laurence and Perry, Hypnosis, will, and memory, p. 203.

29 Bernheim, Hippolyte, Die Hypnose und ihre Heilwirkung (Leipzig and Vienna, 1888), p. 121Google Scholar.

30 Hirt, ‘Aerztliches Gutachten’, p. 61.

31 Ibid., pp. 62, 64. The quote is from p. 64.

32 Treitel, Corinna, A science for the soul: occultism and the genesis of the German modern (Baltimore, MD, and London, 2004), pp. 43–5Google Scholar; Kuff, Timon L., Okkulte Ästhetik: Wunschfiguren des Unbewussten im Werk von Albert von Schrenck-Notzing (Gießen, 2011), p. 101Google Scholar; Wolffram, Healther, ‘Parapsychology on the couch: the psychology of occult belief in Germany, c. 1870–1939’, Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 42 (2006), pp. 237–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 247.

33 Schrenck-Notzing, ‘Aerztliches Gutachten’, in Der Prozeß Czynski, pp. 67–90, here p. 72.

34 Ibid., p. 87.

35 Ibid., pp. 68–9.

36 Ibid.

37 John F. Kihlstrom, ‘The automaticity juggernaut – or, are we automatons after all?’, in Baer, Kaufmann, and Baumeister, eds., Are we free?, pp. 155–80.

38 Trömmer, E., Hypnotismus und Suggestion (Leipzig and Berlin, 1922), p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wolf-Braun, Barbara, ‘“Was jeder Schäferknecht macht, ist eines Arztes unwürdig”: Die Geschichte der Hypnose im wilhelminischen Kaiserreich und in der Weimarer Republik (1888–1932)’, Hypnose und Kognition, 17 (2000), pp. 135–52Google Scholar. For the post-war revival of the occult, see also Winter, Jay, Sites of memory, sites of mourning: the Great War in European cultural history (Cambridge, 1995)Google Scholar.

39 Wolffram, Heather, ‘Crime, clairvoyance and the Weimar police’, Journal of Contemporary History, 44 (2009), pp. 581–601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schellinger, Uwe, ‘Trancemedien und Verbrechensaufklärung: Die “Kriminaltelepathie” in der Weimarer Republik’, in Hahn, Marcus and Schüttpelz, Erhard, eds., Trancemedien und neue Medien um 1900: Ein anderer Blick auf die Moderne (Bielefeld, 2009), pp. 311–39Google Scholar; idem, ‘Kriminaltelepatie’, in Mayer, Gerhard, Schetzsche, Michael, Schmied-Knittel, Ina, and Vaitl, Dieter, eds., An den Grenzen der Erkenntnis: Handbuch der wissenschaftlichen Anomalistik (Stuttgart, 2015), pp. 215–27Google Scholar.

40 Maehle, Andreas-Holger, ‘The powers of suggestion: Albert Moll and the debate on hypnosis’, History of Psychiatry, 25 (2014), pp. 3–19 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Klan, Reginald, Der Mißbrauch der Hypnose: Zur historischen Diskussion um die forensische Bedeutung der Hypnose und ihre möglichen strafrechtlichen Implikationen, nebst einem Falle aus der gerichtsmedizinischen Praxis (Mainz, 1981)Google Scholar.

41 For other members of this ‘group’, see Ivers, Hellmut, Die Hypnose im Deutschen Strafrecht, Reihe: Kriminalistische Abhandlungen der Universität Leipzig (Leipzig, 1927), pp. 26, 67Google Scholar; Kauffmann, Max, Suggestion und Hypnose: Vorlesungen für Mediziner, Psychologen und Juristen (Berlin, 1920), pp. 5, 30, 59–60, 117CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Engelen, Paul, Suggestion und Hypnose (Munich, 1922), pp. 24–5, 38, 40Google Scholar. It is not always clear whether the discussion referred to hypnosis as a procedure (induction and suggestion) or hypnosis as a product (alteration in perception, involuntariness). For these differences, see Nash and Barnier, ‘Introduction: a roadmap for explanation, a working definition’, in idem and idem, eds., Oxford handbook, pp. 1–18, and John F. Kihlstrom, ‘The domain of hypnosis, revisted’, in Nash and Barnier, eds., Oxford handbook, pp. 21–52.

42 Forel, Hypnotismus, p. 274.

43 Ibid., p. 277.

44 Heberle, M. A., Hypnose und Suggestion im deutschen Strafrecht: Eine Studie (Munich, 1893), p. 13Google Scholar. On Lombroso, see Pick, Daniel, Faces of degeneration: a European disorder, c. 1848–c. 1918 (Cambridge, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Horn, David G., The criminal body: Lombroso and the anatomy of deviance (London, 2003)Google Scholar; Strasser, Peter, Verbrechermenschen: Zur kriminalwissenschaftlichen Erzeugung des Bösen (Frankfurt am Main, 2005)Google Scholar.

45 Heberle, Hypnose und Suggestion, p. 17.

46 Ibid., pp. 31, 33.

47 Forel, Hypnotismus, pp. 275–6.

48 Seigel, Jerrold, Modernity and bourgeois life: society, politics, and culture in England, France, and Germany since 1750 (Cambridge, 2012), p. 344CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

49 This scepticism vis-à-vis the determinists has been analysed in Kauders, Anthony D., ‘Verführung, Hingabe, Auftrag: Hypnose und Verbrechen nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg’, Hypnose: Zeitschrift für Hypnose und Hypnotherapie, 10 (2015), pp. 63–80 Google Scholar.

50 As was mentioned time and again, the recorded instances of hypnotic crime were few and far between and those that ended up in court always involved sexual crimes. See, for example, Moll, Hypnotismus, p. 498; Vorkastner, Willy, ‘Die forensische (strafrechtliche) Bedeutung der Hypnose’, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankenheiten, 73 (1925), pp. 461–81, here p. 468CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 Andriopoulos, Stefan, Possessed: hypnotic crimes, corporate fiction, and the invention of cinema (Chicago, IL, and London, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Killen, Andreas, ‘Weimar cinema between hypnosis and enlightenment’, in Laffan, Michael and Weiss, Max, eds., Facing fear: the history of an emotion in global perspective (Princeton, NJ, and Oxford, 2012), pp. 91–113 Google Scholar.

52 Vorkastner, ‘Bedeutung der Hypnose’, pp. 465–6.

53 Bürger-Prinz, Hans, ‘Verbrechen in Hypnose? Fragen und Anmerkungen zu dem Buch von Ludwig Mayer’, Monatsschrift für Kriminalbiologie und Strafrechtsreform, 29 (1938), pp. 194–8Google Scholar.

54 Kirchhoff, Johannes, ‘Ein forensischer Beitrag zum Problem von Suggestion und Hörigkeit’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 178 (1944), pp. 13–51 CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 48. See also Gruhle, Hans W., ‘Die Verwendung der Hypnose und die Mitwirkung von Medien in der Rechtspflege’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 82 (1923), pp. 82–92, here p. 82CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 On ‘hypnotizzy’, see Winter, Memory, p. 103; Genter, ‘“Hypnotizzy”’.

56 On this, see Kane, A contemporary introduction to free will, pp. 121–2, 128; Aschaffenburg, Gustav, Das Verbrechen und seine Bekämpfung (Heidelberg, 1906), p. 211Google Scholar.

57 Harry Frankfurt, ‘Freedom of the will and the concept of a person’, in Watson, ed., Free will, pp. 322–36, here pp. 325, 327–8, 330. For a similar approach based on the concept of self-regulation, see Roy F. Baumeister, ‘Free will, consciousness, and cultural animals’, in Baer, Kaufmann, and Baumeister, eds., Are we free?, pp. 65–85, here p. 71.

58 Friede, Paul, Hypnose und verbrechen (Kempten, 1924), p. 38Google Scholar.

59 Ibid., p. 19.

60 Ibid., p. 28.

61 Ibid., p. 21.

62 Ibid., p. 19; Dessoir, Max, Das Doppel-Ich (Leipzig, 1890), p. 29Google Scholar. For a contemporary critique of Dessoir, see Loewenfeld, Leopold, Hypnotismus und Medizin: Grundriss der Lehre von der Hypnose und der Suggestion mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der ärztlichen Praxis (Munich and Wiesbaden, 1922), p. 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Another commentator, the jurist Walter Weniggensen, tried to distinguish between a conscious that could resist hypnosis and an unconscious that could not, but admitted that it may be possible for ‘counter-perceptions’ to ‘enter’ the unconscious, in such cases precluding sexual crimes. Weniggensen, Walter, Strafbare Handlungen unter hypnotischem Einfluß und ihre Aufklärung (Cologne, 1935), pp. 37–9Google Scholar.

63 See, for example, Kauffmann, Suggestion und Hypnose, pp. 30–1; Gruhle, ‘Die Verwendung der Hypnose’, p. 84.

64 Friedländer, A. A., ‘Hypnose und Rechtspflege: Ein volkshygienisches Mahnwort über die Gefahren der Hypnose’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 83 (1923), pp. 325–83, here p. 366CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

65 Ginneken, Jaap van, Crowds, psychology, and politics, 1871–1899 (Cambridge, 1992), pp. 42–3Google Scholar; Bon, Gustave Le, Psychologie der Massen (Stuttgart, 1911)Google Scholar.

66 Friedländer, ‘Hypnose’, p. 366.

67 Engelen, Suggestion und Hypnose, p. 14; Loewenfeld, Hypnotismus und Medizin, p. 128; Meyer, Semi, Traum, Hypnose und Geheimwissenschaften (Stuttgart, 1922), p. 45Google Scholar; John, Karl, ‘Zum Problem “Hypnose und Verbrechen”’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für die gesamte gerichtliche Medizin, 9 (1926), pp. 603–17Google Scholar, especially pp. 616–17; Jess, Hans, Verbrechen in Hypnose und posthypnotische Suggestion (Würzburg, 1936)Google Scholar. Jess quoted from John, see p. 13; Többen, Heinrich, ‘Über verbrecherische Ausnutzung suggestiver Fähigkeiten’, Monatsschrift für Kriminalpsychologie und Strafrechtsreform, 12 (1921/2), pp. 331–41Google Scholar; idem, ‘Hypnose’, in Neuseiter, F., ed., Handwörterbuch der gerichtlichen Medizin und naturwissenschaftlichen Kriminalistik (Berlin, 1940), pp. 375–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Knigge, Fritz, ‘Aberglaube und Verbrechen (Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Frage der psychischen Induktion)’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 166 (1939), pp. 271–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

68 Lucas, Werner, Der Hypnotismus in seinen Beziehungen zum deutschen Strafrecht und Strafprozess (Berlin and Bonn, 1930), p. 20Google Scholar.

69 Ibid., p. 8.

70 Ibid., p. 72. See also Loewenfeld, Hypnotismus und Medizin, p. 127; Verworn, Max, Die Mechanik des Geisteslebens (Leipzig and Berlin, 1919), p. 99Google Scholar; Schilder, Paul, Über das Wesen der Hypnose (Berlin, 1922), p. 18Google Scholar.

71 Ivers, Hypnose, pp. 18–21.

72 Ibid., p. 24.

73 Ibid., pp. 53, 67.

74 Ibid., pp. 26, 67.

75 Ibid., p. 67.

76 For similar accounts, see Kauders, ‘Verführung’.

77 Friedrichs, Theodor, Zur Psychologie der Hypnose und der Suggestion: Mit einem Vorwort von Arthur Kronfeld (Stuttgart, 1922), pp. 10–11 Google Scholar; Hammerschlag, Heinz, Hypnose und Verbrechen: Ein Beitrag zur Phänomenologie der Suggestion und der Hypnose (Munich and Basle, 1954), p. 96Google Scholar. Accounts of the standard social psychological view that hypnotics are well aware of the situation in which they are expected to be hypnotized can be found in  Kirsch, Irving, ‘Response expectancy theory and application: a decennial review’, Applied and Preventive Psychology, 6 (1997), pp. 69–79 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sarbin, Theodore, ‘Dialogical components in theory-building: contributions of Hilgard, Orne and Spanos’, Contemporary Hypnosis, 19 (2002), pp. 190–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lynn, Steven Jay and O'Hagen, Sean, ‘The sociocognitive and conditioning and inhibition theories of hypnosis’, Contemporary Hypnosis, 26 (2009), pp. 121–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lynn, Steven Jay and Green, Joseph P., ‘The sociocognitive and dissociation theories of hypnosis: towards a rapprochment’, International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 59 (2011), pp. 277–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Paas, Fritz Wilhelm Gustav, Strafbare Handlungen Hypnotisierter (Erlangen, 1933), pp. 21, 23Google Scholar.

79 Ibid., 31.

80 Paas appropriated a view made prominent by Bernheim, Hippolyte, Die Suggestion und ihre Heilwirkung (Leipzig and Vienna, 1889), pp. 121–2Google Scholar.

81 Paas, Strafbare Handlungen, p. 22.

82 Bergmann, Wilhelm, ‘Hypnose und Willensfreiheit im Lichte der neueren Forschung’, Frankfurter Zeitgemäße Broschüren, 31 (1922), pp. 1–28, here pp. 10–12Google Scholar.

83 Bergmann, ‘Hypnose’, p. 21.

84 Forel, Hypnotismus, pp. 275–7. See also Hirschlaff, Leo, Hypnotismus und Suggestivtherapie für Ärzte und Studierende (Leipzig, 1928), pp. 76–7Google Scholar.

85 Bergmann, ‘Hypnose’, pp. 17–18.

86 Ibid., p. 9.

87 Kindborg, Erich, ‘Die Verwendung der Hypnose in der Rechtspflege’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 88 (1924), pp. 233–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

88 Ibid., p. 240.

89 Teichler, Jens-Uwe, ‘Der Charlatan strebt nicht nach Wahrheit, er verlangt nur nach Geld’: Zur Auseinandersetzung zwischen naturwissenschaftlicher Medizin und Laienmedizin im deutschen Kaiserreich am Beispiel von Hypnotismus und Heilmagnetismus (Stuttgart, 2002)Google Scholar; Freytag, Nils, Aberglauben im 19. Jahrhundert: Preußen und seine Rheinprovinz zwischen Tradition und Moderne (1815–1918) (Berlin, 2003), pp. 266–7Google Scholar; Barbara Wolf-Braun, ‘Parapsychologische und psychiatrische Konstruktionen des Mediumismus um 1900’, in  Hahn and Schüttpelz, eds., Trancemedien, pp. 145–70, here pp. 148–9.

90 Peter, Burkhard, ‘Ist Hypnose hinreichend ein Verbrechen zu begehen? Die Kontroverse zwischen Mayer und Bürger-Prinz über den Heidelberger Hypnoseprozess 1936: Ein frühes Beispiel des Diskurses über den Bewusstseinszustand von Hypnotisierten’,  Hypnose, 10 (2015), pp. 7–26, here pp. 7, 9Google Scholar; Ludwig Mayer, Das Verbrechen in der Hypnose und seine Aufklärungsmethoden (Munich and Berlin, 1937), pp. 94, 98, 106–7, 114–16, 188.

91 Mayer, Ludwig, Die Technik der Hypnose (Munich, 1934)Google Scholar.

92 Mayer, Ludwig, ‘Zur forensischen Bedeutung der Hypnose’, Hypnose, 10 (2015), pp. 27–43 Google Scholar.

93 Mayer, Verbrechen, p. 10.

94 Ibid., pp. 10, 35.

95 Ibid., pp. 37, 208–9.

96 Ibid., pp. 67, 197.

97 Ibid, pp. 53, 67.

98 Ibid., p. 53; Hellwig, Albert, ‘Hypnose und Verbrechen: Lehren des Heidelberger Falles’,  Deutsche Justiz, 99 (1937), pp. 1986–9, here p. 1986Google Scholar.

99 Hellwig, ‘Hypnose’, p. 1988.

100 Bürger-Prinz, ‘Verbrechen’, pp. 194–5. Bürger-Prinz relied on Vorkastner, whom he cited approvingly.

101 Ibid., p. 197.

102 See n. 76.

103 Ibid., p. 196.

104 Knigge, ‘Aberglaube und Verbrechen’, p. 284. See also Haupt, Johannes, ‘Eine experimentelle Untersuchung zur Frage der kriminellen hypnotischen Beeinflussbarkeit’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie, 159 (1937), pp. 767–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar, here p. 768.

105 Kirchhoff, ‘Ein forensischer Beitrag’, p. 48.

106 Bieri, Das Handwerk der Freiheit, p. 22.

107 Kane, A contemporary introduction to free will, p. 18.

108 On the importance of emotional self-control for conceptions of bürgerlich identity, see Reckwitz, Andreas, Das hybride Subjekt: Eine Theorie der Subjektkulturen von der bürgerlichen Moderne zur Postmoderne (Weilerwist, 2006)Google Scholar, and Hettling, Manfred and Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig, ‘Der bürgerliche Wertehimmel: Zum Problem individueller Lebensführung im 19. Jahrhundert’, Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 23 (1997), pp. 333–59Google Scholar.

109 Kauders, ‘Verführung’; Van Ginneken, Crowds, psychology, and politics, pp. 42–3; Wolffram, Heather, The stepchildren of science: psychical research and parapsychology in Germany, c. 1870–1939 (Amsterdam and New York, NY, 2009), p. 51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wolf-Braun, ‘Parapsychologische’, p. 166.

110 Reckwitz, Das hybride Subjekt, p. 97.

111 See, for example, Mergel, Thomas, ‘Führer, Volksgemeinschaft und Maschine: Politische Erwartungsstrukturen in der Weimarer Republik und dem Nationalsozialismus, 1918–1936’, in Hartwig, Wolfgang, ed., Politische Kulturgeschichte der Zwischenkriegszeit, 1918–1939 (Göttingen, 2005), pp. 91–127 Google Scholar.

112 Hettling and Hoffmann, ‘Der bürgerliche Wertehimmel’, pp. 358–9.