Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:50:53.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imperialism in Decline? Tendencies in British Imperial policy between the wars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2009

John Darwin
John Darwin
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The inter-war years are a nomansland in the history of British decolonization. Conventional as it is to see the first World War as a great watershed in British imperial history, separating the era of strength and success from the age of decline and dissolution, it remains difficult to show conclusively that the disintegration of the imperial system had become inevitable before the second World War. Yet historians have felt instinctively that after 1918 much of the crude self-confidence had drained out of British imperialism. The age when Curzon could proclaim heroically that ‘efficiency of administration is in my view a synonym for the contentment of the governed’; when Cromer could lecture the khedive of Egypt like a schoolboy; or when Milner could set out to demolish everything that preserved a separate identity to the Afrikaners, appears in striking contrast to the post-war era when statesmen spoke the language of trusts and mandates, genuflected before the image of self-determination and claimed that self-government was the ultimate purpose of colonial rule. But for all the piety of its new principles, post-war imperial policy seemed strangely reluctant to liberate Britain's dependencies or hold out firm promises of independence; and the imperial government periodically repressed its recalcitrant subjects with a vigour and efficiency that would have impressed Lord Kitchener.

Type
Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , September 1980 , pp. 657 - 679
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Grimal, H., La décolonisation (Paris, 1965), p. 53Google Scholar.

2 McIntyre, W. D., Colonies into commonwealth (London, 1966), p. 209Google Scholar.

3 Porter, B., The lion's share (London, 1975), p. 301Google Scholar.

4 McIntyre, , Colonies, p. 209Google Scholar; von Albertini, R., Decolonisation: the administration and future of the colonies, 1919–1960 (New York, 1971), pp. 20, 48Google Scholar.

5 Schmokel, W., ‘The hard death of imperialism’ in Gifford, P. and Louis, W. R. (eds.), Britain and Germany in Africa (New Haven, 1967), p. 326Google Scholar.

6 See Halstead, J. P., Rebirth of a nation: origins and rise of Moroccan nationalism, 1912–1944 (Cambrdge, Mass., 1967)Google Scholar; Longrigg, S. H., Syria and Lebanon under French mandate (London, 1958)Google Scholar.

7 See Duffy, J., Portuguese Africa (Cambridge, Mass., 1961), p. 279Google Scholar; Young, C., Politics in the Congo (Princeton, 1965), pp. 10–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kossman, E. H., The Low Countries, 1780–1940 (Oxford, 1978), p. 671Google Scholar.

8 Pipes, R., The formation of the Soviet Union: communism and nationalism, 1917–23 (rev. edn, Cambridge, Mass., 1964), pp. 269–297Google Scholar.

9 Strachey, J., The coming struggle for power (London, 1932)Google Scholar: a sound Leninist position.

10 See the forebodings in Kenyatta, J., Facing Mount Kenya (London, 1938), p. 318Google Scholar.

11 Coupland, R., The constitutional problem in India (Madras, 1944)Google Scholar, part 1,146.

12 The primacy of imperial considerations in foreign and defence policy can be followed in: Howard, M., The continental commitment (London, 1972)Google Scholar; Pratt, L. R., East of Malta, west of Suez (Cambridge, 1975)Google Scholar; Newman, S., March 1939: the British guarantee to Poland (Oxford, 1976)Google Scholar; Lowe, P., Great Britain and the origins of the Pacific war, 1937–41 (Oxford, 1977)Google Scholar.

13 Conclusions of cabinet 31(33), 26 April 1933, CAB. 23/76, Public Record Office.

14 Strachey, , The coming struggle, p. 391Google Scholar.

15 Simon to Baldwin, personal, 20 July 1932, Baldwin papers, box 118, Cambridge University Library.

16 Note by Austen Chamberlain, 22 Oct. 1926, Balfour papers, British library, Add. MSS 49736.

17 Amery to Smuts, 20 June 1921, ibid: 49775.

18 Hertzog's own account in Van Den Heever, C. M., General J. B. M. Hertzog (Eng. trans, Johannesburg, 1946)Google Scholar.

19 Balfour in the House of Lords 8 Dec. 1926, Dugdale, B. E. C., Arthur James Balfour (London, 1936), II, 382Google Scholar; Amery's contemporary assessment, Amery, L. S., My political life: war and peace, 1914–29 (London, 1953), p. 394Google Scholar.

20 Mansergh, N., Survey of British commonwealth affairs: problems of wartime cooperation and post-war change, 1939–52 (London, 1958), pp. 8–9Google Scholar.

21 Amery to A. Chamberlain, 15 Oct. 1926, Balfour papers 49775.

22 ‘The Empire’, he revealed, ‘is, like the Kingdom of Heaven, within us’. Amery, L. S., The forward view (London, 1935), p. 186Google Scholar.

23 The Irish Free State represented a modified version.

24 Hankey to Balfour, secret, 1 Nov. 1926, Balfour papers 49704.

25 For an impression of how widespread still was the expectation that European migration would flow into new agrarian regions, see Bowman, I., The pioneer fringe (New York, 1931)Google Scholar, and Joerg, W. L. G. (ed.), Pioneer settlement (New York, 1932)Google Scholar.

26 For this notion, Condliffe, J. B., New Zealand in the making (London, 1930), p. 397Google Scholar.

27 Quoted in Plant, G. F., Overseas settlement (London, 1951), p. 128Google Scholar.

28 See McCleary, G. F., The menace of British depopulation (London, 1937), p. 7Google Scholar. For a confident academic view in the 1930s, Coatman, J., Magna Britannia (London, 1936), pp. 279–81Google Scholar.

29 Barnes, L., Caliban in Africa (London, 1930), p. 37Google Scholar.

30 See Neville Chamberlain's views in Drummond, I. M., British economic policy and the empire (London, 1972), p. 233, n. 10Google Scholar. For the general attitude towards colonial economic development, Meredith, D., ‘The British government and colonial economic policy, 1919–39’, Economic History Review 2nd series, XXVIII (1975), 495Google Scholar.

31 Thomas, B., Migration and economic growth (Cambridge, 1954), pp. 213–14Google Scholar. For the growing domination of primary products in Australian exports, 1901–27, Shann, E., An economic history of Australia (Cambridge, 1930), p. 386Google Scholar.

32 The proportion of N.Z. exports taken by Britain reached a peak of 88% in 1932 and stood at 84% in 1938. Ross, A., ‘Reluctant dominion or dutiful daughter’ Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, X, I, (1972), 41Google Scholar.

32 Meenan, J., The Irish economy since 1922 (Liverpool, 1970), p. 76Google Scholar.

34 Quoted in O'Sullivan, D., The Irish Free State and its senate (London, 1940), p. 327Google Scholar.

35 Gold comprised 50% of South African exports in 1922–9, 70% in 1932–8: Houghton, D. H. and Dagut, J., Source material on the South African economy (Cape Town, 1973), III, 113Google Scholar.

36 Whetham, E. H. (ed.), The agrarian history of England and Wales, Vol. VIII, 1914–1939, (Cambridge, 1978), p. 328Google Scholar. See also Richardson, J. H., British economic foreign policy (London, 1936), pp. 197 ffGoogle Scholar.

37 Ibid. p. 65.

38 Documents on Canadian external relations (Ottawa, 1973), V, 49Google Scholar.

39 See Bruce's encounter with Neville Chamberlain in Edwards, C., Bruce of Melbourne (London, 1965), p. 218Google Scholar.

40 See the description in Wood, G., Business and borrowing in Australia (Oxford, 1930)Google Scholar.

41 Hence the demand for special terms on the British market at the 1930 Imperial Conference.

42 For an authoritative contemporary guide, Cole, D. H., Imperial military geography (8th edn, London, 1935)Google Scholar.

43 Pointed out by Condliffe, , New Zealand, p. 400Google Scholar.

44 Granatstein, J. L. and Bothwell, R., ‘“A self-evident national duty”: Canadian foreign policy 1935–39’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, III, 2 (1975), 221Google Scholar.

45 See A. Trotter, ‘The dominions and imperial defence: Hankey's tour in 1934’, ibid, II, 3 (1974), 324.

46 Chanock, M., Unconsummated union: Britain, Rhodesia and South Africa, 1900–45 (Manchester, 1977), PP. 204–10Google Scholar.

47 See Wigley, P., Canada and the transition to commonwealth (Cambridge, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For Canadian and South African opposition to any formal co-operation in imperial defence in 1937, Tamchina, R., ‘In search of common causes: the Imperial Conference of 1937’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, I, 1 (1972), 93–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 D. Carlton, ‘The dominions and British policy in the Abyssinian crisis’, ibid. I, 1 (1972), 59–77.

49 Note by Austen Chamberlain, 22 Oct. 1926, Balfour papers 49736.

50 Memo, by dominions secretary for foreign secretary, 23 Mar. 1938, D.O. 114/94, Public Record Office.

51 High commissioner to dominions secretary, 13 Sept. 1939, D.O. 114/98.

52 For confident expression of this view by a trio of ‘enlightened imperialists’, see SirWillert, A., Long, B. K., Hodson, H. V., The empire and the world (London, 1937), ch. ixGoogle Scholar.

53 Hancock, W. K., Australia (London, 1930)Google Scholar, passim.

54 Ross, , ‘Reluctant dominion’, pp. 28–9Google Scholar; Condliffe, , New Zealand, pp. 397–9Google Scholar.

55 See memos by Wrong, H. H., 7 12 1938. Documents on Canadian external relations (Ottawa, 1972), VI, 1104–6Google Scholar; and by O. D. Skelton, 25 Aug. 1939, ibid. pp. 1247–52.

56 Stultz, N. M., Afrikaner politics in South Africa, 1934–48 (Los Angeles and London, 1974), p. 57Google Scholar; Long, B. K., In Smuts' camp (London, 1945), p. 36Google Scholar.

57 It was possible to visualize Anglo-Irish defence co-operation, said De Valera in Dec. 1938, but only in a free and united Ireland: Mansergh, N., The commonwealth and the nations (London, 1948), p. 180Google Scholar.

58 See O'Sullivan, Irish Free State; Lyons, F. S. L., Ireland since the famine (rev. edn, London, 1973), p. 526Google Scholar.

59 For De Valera's promise, see Nowlan, K. and Williams, T. D. (eds.), Ireland in the war years and after (Dublin, 1969), p. 6Google Scholar. For Anglo-Irish co-operation after Sept. 1939, see Dwyer, T. R., Irish neutrality and the U.S.A. (Dublin, 1977), p. 19Google Scholar. British policy 1932–8 is summarized in Harkness, D., ‘Mr De Valera's dominion: Irish relations with Britain and the commonwealth 1932–38’, Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, VII, 3 (1970)Google Scholar.

60 Pointed out by Admiral Beatty. Memo, by chief of naval staff, 27 Oct. 1920, C.P. 2034, CAB 24/114.

61 Report by chiefs of staff subcommittee, 5 Feb. 1936, F.O. 371/20098, Public Record Office.

62 Pointed out in memo, by foreign secretary, 4 Jan. 1936, C.P. 6 (36), F.O. 371/20096.

63 J. Darwin, Britain, Egypt and the Middle East: imperial policy in the aftermath of war 1918–22 (forthcoming), ch. 111.

64 Memo, by colonial secretary, 16 Sept. 1920, C.P. 1870, CAB. 24/111. Milner's ideas are best set out in the ‘General Conclusions’ of the Milner mission, May 1920, F.O. 848/19/1; and in Milner to Curzon, confid., 19 Aug. 1920, Milner papers 162, Bodleian Library.

65 Minute by Lindsay, 16 Mar. 1929, F.O. 371/13841.

66 Vansittart to Lampson, personal, 10 July 1935, F.O. 371/19073. Lampson was high commissioner in Egypt.

67 Memo. by J. Murray, 23 Mar. 1928, F.O. 371/13118.

68 Ibid.

69 Ibid.

70 Lampson to Sir S. Hoare, 1 Aug. 1935, F.O. 371/19073. When Fu'ad died, Lampson's comment was the same. Lampson's diary, 30 April 1936, Killearn collection, Middle East Centre, at Antony's College, Oxford.

71 Minute by J. Murray, 13 June 1929, F.O. 371/13841.

72 Lampson's diary, 18 April 1935.

73 Ibid.

74 ‘Historical summary’, Oct. 1925 to Nov. 1926, F.O. 371/12354.

75 Minute by R. I. Campbell, 17 June 1935, F.O. 371/19073.

76 Lampson's diary, 10 April 1934.

77 Memo, by foreign secretary, 8 June 1936, C.P. 156 (36), F.O. 371/20110; conclusions of cabinet 43 (36), 23 June 1936, F.O. 371/20111; Lampson's diary, 15 June 1936.

78 Lampson to Foreign Office, 6 Oct. 1935, F.O. 371/19076.

79 Egypt, annual report for 1937, F.O. 371/22006.

80 Lampson to Foreign Office, 28 May 1936, F.O. 371/20109.

81 See Rawson, J. O., ‘The role of India in imperial defence beyond Indian frontiers and home waters’, D.Phil, thesis, Oxford, 1976Google Scholar.

82 For a discussion of this see Tomlinson, B. R., ‘Foreign private investment in India, 1920–50’, Modern Asian Studies, XII, 4 (1978)Google Scholar, and his longer study, The political economy of the Raj, 1914–47 (London, 1979)Google Scholar.

83 See Seal, A., ‘Imperialism and nationalism in India’, Modern Asian Studies, VII, 3 (1973), 333–4Google Scholar; Washbrook, D., The emergence of provincial politics (Cambridge, 1976), pp. 51 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bayly, C. A., The local roots of Indian politics (Oxford, 1975), pp. 11, 96–7Google Scholar.

84 For the confident judgement of Harcourt Butler in 1910, Bayly, , The local roots, p. 243Google Scholar.

85 For surveys of British policy after 1918, Tomlinson, B. R., The Indian National Congress and the Raj, 1929–42: the penultimate phase (London, 1976), pp. 7–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Moore, R. J., The crisis of Indian unity (Oxford, 1974)Google Scholar.

86 For a recent example, Ramsden, J., The age of Balfour and Baldwin (London, 1978), p. 336Google Scholar.

87 Note by Lord Birkenhead, 4 June 1925, Baldwin papers, box 93.

88 Willingdon to Baldwin, 29 Aug. 1924, Baldwin papers, box 102. Willingdon was governor of Madras 1919–24.

89 Report of the Indian statutory commission, vol. II: Recommendations, Cmd. 3569 (1930), para 40Google Scholar.

90 Ibid. para. 45.

91 Ibid. para. 11.

92 Ibid. para. 24.

93 Ibid. para. 108.

94 A process to be encouraged by financial devolution.

95 Report, II, para. 19.

96 Lord Lloyd to Baldwin, private, 2 Mar. 1931, Baldwin papers, box 104; Birkenhead to Baldwin, very urgent, 30 June 1930, ibid.

97 Gilbert, M., Winston S. Churchill, vol. V: 1922–39 (London, 1976), 376, 380, 469, 483Google Scholar.

98 Irwin to Baldwin, 11 April 1927, Baldwin papers, box 102.

99 Moore, , The crisis, pp. 116–17Google Scholar.

100 For Hoare's discovery of the federal solution, ibid., ch. III.

101 Provincial council entry had blighted the all-India activities of Congress after 1922. Brown, J. M., Gandhi and civil disobedience (Cambridge, 1977), pp. 11–14Google Scholar.

102 Note by chief secretary, Madras government, 5 Dec. 1934, quoted in Arnold, D., ‘The politics of coalescence in Tamilnad 1930–7’, in Low, D. A. (ed.), Congress and the Raj (London, 1977), p. 282Google Scholar.

103 See Glendevon, J., Viceroy at bay (London, 1971)Google Scholar; ‘Essayez’: the memoirs of the second marquess of Zetland (London, 1956), p. 277Google Scholar.

104 Linlithgow to Baldwin, 10 Sept. 1936, Baldwin papers, box 107. For the internal divisions of Congress after taking office in 1937, Tomlinson, , The Indian National Congress, pp. 86–107Google Scholar; M. Harcourt, ‘Unity on trial: Congress in Bihar, 1929–39’, in Congress and the Raj.

105 Thus Irwin had looked forward to the emergence of parties based upon non-communal socio-economic interests. Bridge, C., ‘Conservatism and Indian reform, 1929–39’. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, IV, 2 (1976), 183Google Scholar.

106 See Report, II, part V. Irwin shared this assumption. See Peele, G., ‘A note on the Irwin Declaration’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, I, 3 (1973), 331–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For its surival after 1945, see the views of the chiefs of staff in March 1946 in Mansergh, N., The transfer of power, 1942–7 (London, 1976), V, 1166–73Google Scholar.

107 Hence the emphasis upon preserving the European element in the Indian civil service in the later 1930s. Potter, D. C., ‘Manpower shortage and the end of colonialism’, Modern Asian Studies, VII, 1 (1973), 47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar; T. H. Beaglehole, ‘From rulers to servants: the I.C.S. and the British demission of power in India’, ibid. XI, 2 (1977), 243.

108 Hoare to Willingdon, private and personal, 2 Sept. 1931, Templewood collection, MSS Eur. E 240/1, India Office Records.

109 Templewood papers, VIII/4, Cambridge University Library.

110 Linlithgow to Baldwin, 22 Mar. 1940, Baldwin papers, box 107.

111 Lucas, C. P. (ed.), Lord Durham's report on the affairs of British North America (3 vols., Oxford, 1912), II, 79–83Google Scholar.

112 See Ward, J. M., Colonial self-government: the British experience, 1759–1856 (London, 1976), pp. 211, 269, 287, 297–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For the later nineteenth cent., Will, H. A., ‘Problems of constitutional reform in Jamaica, Mauritius and Trinidad, 1880–95’, English Historical Review, 81 (1966), 693–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

113 McCracken, J. L., The Cape parliament, 1854–1910 (Oxford, 1967), p. 125Google Scholar.

114 Chanock, , Unconsummated union, p. 60Google Scholar.

115 Report of the special commission on the constitution of Ceylon, Cmd. 3131 (1928), pp. 18–29, 35, 72.

116 SirClementi, C., Constitutional history of British Guiana (London, 1937), p. 393Google Scholar.