Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T06:51:49.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

3. Lord Acton's Correspondence with Döllinger

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2010

Herbert Butterfield
Herbert Butterfield
Affiliation:
Peterhouse, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Historical Journal , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , 1966 , pp. 140 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Father Conzemius has used this source where an actual letter has not survived, pp. 493-4n.

2 Cambridge University Library MSS. Add. 5527-9, 5751; cf. Add. 4862, 5752.

3 Vol. VIII, no. 3 (1946), 186-204, ‘Journal of Lord Acton: Rome 1857’.

4 Fortnightly Review, 11 and 12 1921 and 01 1922.Google Scholar

5 Politica, iv, 248-65, ‘The Place of Lord Acton in the Liberal Movement of the Nineteenth Century’.

6 Author of Jakob III von Eltz, Erzbischof von Trier, 1567-81 (Wiesbaden, 1956)Google Scholar.

7 For the imperfections of this see Cambridge Historical Journal, x, 1 (1950), 75–105Google Scholar , ‘Gasquet and the Acton-Simpson Correspondence’.

8 I have tried to set out our knowledge of this (down to the appearance of the Acton-Dollinger correspondence) in ‘Acton: His training, methods and intellectual system’ in Sarkissian, A. O. (ed.), Studies in Diplomatic History and Historiography in honour of G. P. Gooch (London, 1961)Google Scholar.

9 The doubt was raised by a passage in Bright, J. F., A History of England 1837-80 (London, 1888), p. 444.Google Scholar See Letters of Lord Acton to Mary Gladstone (London, 1913), pp. 187–8Google Scholar , and Acton's review of Bright, English Historical Review, III (1888), 803Google Scholar.

10 MacDougall, H. A., The Acton-Newman Relations (New York, 1962), pp. 91–3.Google Scholar