Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T17:30:11.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Westerbork Survey of Rich Clusters of Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Edwin A. Valentijn*
Affiliation:
Sterrewacht, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the Westerbork Survey of Rich Clusters of galaxies (WSRC), seven nearby and rich clusters of galaxies have been observed with the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope. The results obtained at different frequencies are published in several papers of a series, and Table 1 serves as a general reference to these publications. In these papers, both discussions on individual radio sources and the presentation of cluster radio luminosity functions (RLF) are given. Here we summarize some of the results of the WSRC which, from a statistical point of view, impose some constraints on the rate of the radio activity of galaxies and on the influence of the galaxy environments on their activity. The rate of radio activity of a sample of galaxies in a cluster can be described by the integral RLF of the cluster, which represents the fraction of galaxies that emit in the radio domain above a certain power. When it is presented as a function of the optical luminosities of the cluster galaxies, it is called the bivariate radio luminosity function (BRLF). The BRLFs are most suitable for representing in an unbiased way the rate of activity of a sample of galaxies, since they are presented in absolute parameters and are normalized to the optical luminosity function (or distribution) of the galaxy samples. This is important since, both inside and outside clusters, it has been shown that the RLF depends strongly on the optical luminosities.

Type
Joint Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

Auriemma, C., Perola, G.C., Ekers, R., Fanti, R., Lari, C., Jaffe, W.J., Ulrich, M.H.: 1977, Astron. Astrophys. 57, p. 41.Google Scholar
Bridle, A.H., Fomalont, E.B., Miley, G.K., Valentijn, E.A.: (1980) (submitted to Astron. Astrophys.).Google Scholar
Cameron, M.J.: 1971a, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 152, p. 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, M.J.: 1971b, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 152, p. 429.Google Scholar
Fanaroff, B.L. and Riley, J.M.: 1974, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 167, p. 30.Google Scholar
Gavazzi, G.: 1978 (Paper VII) Astron. Astrophys. 69, p. 355.Google Scholar
Gavazzi, G.: 1979 (Paper VIII) Astron. Astrophys. 72, p. 1.Google Scholar
Gavazzi, G., Perola, G.C.: 1980 (Paper XII) Astron. Astrophys., in pressGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, W.J., Perola, G.C.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 26, p. 423.Google Scholar
Jaffe, W.J., Perola, G.C.: 1974, (Paper 0) Astron. Astrophys. 31, p. 223.Google Scholar
Jaffe, W.J., Perola, G.C.: 1975 (Paper I) Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 21, p. 137.Google Scholar
Jaffe, W.J., Perola, G.C.: 1976 (Paper II) Astron. Astrophys. 46, p. 275.Google Scholar
Jaffe, W.J., Perola, G.C., Valentijn, E.A.: 1976 (Paper III) Astron. Astrophys. 49, p. 179.Google Scholar
Lari, C., Perola, G.C.: 1978, IAU Symp. No. 79, The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 137.Google Scholar
Owen, F.N., Rudnick, L.: 1976, Astrophys. J. 205, p. LI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perola, G.C., Valentijn, E.A.: 1979, Astron. Astrophys. 73, p. 54 (Paper IX).Google Scholar
Perola, G.C, Tarenghi, M., Valentijn, E.A.: 1980 (Paper XI), Astron. Astrophys., in press.Google Scholar
Simon, A.J.B.: 1978, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 184, p. 537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentijn, E.A., Perola, G.C., Jaffe, W.J.: 1977 (Paper IV) Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 28, p. 333.Google Scholar
Valentijn, E.A., Perola, G.C.: 1978 (Paper V) Astron. Astrophys. 63, p. 29.Google Scholar