Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T13:56:29.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theoretical Considerations on the Dynamics of Normal Galactic Nuclei

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Robert H. Sanders*
Affiliation:
Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

I want to discuss the origin of non-circular gas motions observed in the nuclei of normal spiral galaxies and the possibility that recurring violent activity in normal nuclei excites such motion. But first, let us review several basic aspects of the nearest normal galactic nucleus — the nucleus of our own Galaxy.

The rotation curve as observed in the 21-cm line of neutral hydrogen gives some indication of the form of the gravitational field in the central region of the Galaxy. Figure 1 is a smooth fit to the rotation curve in the inner few kiloparsecs (solid line) taken essentially from the data of Rougoor and Oort (1960) and Simonson and Mader (1973). This rotation curve, within 1 kpc of the centre, is completely accounted for by the mass distribution implied by the extended 2.2-μ emission (Becklin and Neugebauer 1968, Oort 1971). Moreover, there is little doubt that this centrally condensed mass distribution should be identified with the bulge or spheroidal component of the Galaxy, because the spatial distribution of the 2.2-μ intensity is practically identical to the distribution of visible starlight in the bulge of M31 (Sandage, Becklin, and Neugebauer 1969). The conclusion is that the bulge overwhelmingly dominates the gravitational field inside of 1 kpc.

Type
Joint Discussion
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

References

Bania, T.M.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 216, 381 Google Scholar
Becklin, E.E., Neugebauer, G.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 151, 145 Google Scholar
Binney, J.: 1978, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 183, 501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, W.B., Liszt, H.S.: 1978, Astrophys. J. 225, 790 Google Scholar
Crane, P.: 1975, Astrophys. J. 197, 317 Google Scholar
De Vaucouleurs, G.: 1964, in I.A.U. Symp. 20, 88 Google Scholar
Kaifu, J., Kato, T., Iguchi, T.: 1972, Nature Phys. Sc. 238, 105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, F.J.: 1968, in Radio Astronomy and the Galactic System, I.A.U. Symp. 31, ed. van Woerden, H. Google Scholar
Komendy, J.: 1979, Astrophys. J. 227, 714 Google Scholar
Kruit P.C., van der: 1971, Astron. Astrophys. 13, 405 Google Scholar
Liszt, H.S., Burton, W.B.: 1980, Astrophys. J. in pressGoogle Scholar
Oort, J.H.: 1971, Nuclei of Galaxies, ed. O’Connel, D.J.K., North Holland Google Scholar
Oort, J.H.: 1977, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 15, 295 Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P., Peebles, P.J.E.: 1973, Astrophys. J. 186, 467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, W.L.: 1975, Astrophys. J. 195, 617 Google Scholar
Rickard, L.J., Palmer, P., Morris, M., Turner, B.E., Zuckermaii, B.: 1977, Astrophys. J. 213, 673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, W.W.: 1971, Bull. A.A.S. 3, 369 Google Scholar
Rougoor, G.W., Oort, J.H.: 1960, Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 46, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandage, A., Becklin, E.F., Neugebauer, G.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 157, 55 Google Scholar
Sanders, R.H., Louwinger, T.: 1972, Astron. J. 77, 292 Google Scholar
Sanders, R.H., Wrixon, G.T.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 26, 365 Google Scholar
Sanders, R.H., Prendergast, K.H.: 1974, Astrophys. J. 188, 439 Google Scholar
Sanders, R.H.: 1979, in The Large Scale Characteristics of the Galaxy, ed. Burton, W.B., IAU Symp. No. 84, 383.Google Scholar
Sanders, R.H., Tubbs, A.D.: 1980, Astrophys. J. in pressGoogle Scholar
Scoville, N.Z.: 1972, Astrophys. J. 175, L 127 Google Scholar
Shane, W.W.: 1978, in Structure and Properties of Nearby Galaxies, eds. Berkhuijsen, E.M. and Wielebinski, R., IAU Symp. No. 77, 180.Google Scholar
Simonson, S.C., Mader, G.L.: 1973, Astron. Astrophys. 27, 337 Google Scholar
Sinha, R.P.: 1979, Ph. D. Thesis, University of Maryland Google Scholar