Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T04:51:36.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Streaming Motions in the Local Universe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

Ofer Lahav*
Affiliation:
Institute of AstronomyMadingley Road Cambridge, CB3 OHA. England

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Deviations from the Hubble flow directly probe of the underlying total mass distribution, assuming the gravitational instability picture. We discuss the origin of motion of the Local Group with respect to the Cosmic Background Radiation and review the peculiar velocity field deduced from distances to hundreds of elliptical and spiral galaxies, including new results for the Shapley Supercluster. Bulk-flow solutions which are free of Malmquistbias are presented, indicating coherence length larger than that expected from the optical and IRAS dipoles or from Cold Dark Matter models.

Type
Joint Commission Meetings
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1992

References

Aaronson, M, et al., 1986. Ap. J., 302, 536.Google Scholar
Bertschinger, E. & Dekel, A., Faber, S.M., Dressier, A., & Burstein, D., 1990. Ap. J., 364, 370.Google Scholar
Dressier, A. & Faber, S.M., 1990. Ap. J., 354, L45.Google Scholar
Efstathiou, G., Sutherland, W.J. & Maddox, S.J., 1990. Nature, 348, 705.Google Scholar
Faber, S.M. & Burstein, D., 1988. in Large Scale Motions in the Universe, eds. Coyne, G. V. & Rubin, V.C., Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Gorski, K. et al. 1989. Ap. J., 344, 1.Google Scholar
Groth, E.J., Juszkiewicz, R. & Ostriker, J.P., 1989. Ap. J., 346, 558.Google Scholar
Juszkiewicz, R., Vittorio, N. & Wyse, R., 1990. Ap. J., 349, 408.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N., 1988. M.N.R.A.S., 231, 149.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. & Lahav, O., 1989. M.N.R.A.S., 237, 129.Google Scholar
Kaiser, N. el al., 1991. M.N.R.A.S., 252, 1.Google Scholar
Lahav, O., Kaiser, N. & Hoffman, Y., 1990. Ap. J., 352, 448.Google Scholar
Lahav, O., Lilje, P.B., Primack, J.R., & Rees, M.J., 1991. M.N.R.A.S., 251, 128.Google Scholar
Lilje, P.B., Yahil, A. & Jones, B.J.T., 1986. Ap. J, 307, 91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucey, J.R., Guzman, R., Carter, D. & Terlevich, R. J., 1991. preprint.Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D., Faber, S.M., Burstein, D., Davies, R.L., Dressier, A., Terlevich, R.J & Wegner, G., 1988. Ap. J., 326, 19.Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D., Lahav, O. & Burstein, D., 1989. M.N.R.A.S., 241, 325.Google Scholar
Lynden-Bell, D., 1991. In “Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy”, eds. Babu, G.J. & Feigelson, E.D..Google Scholar
Mathewson, D.S., Ford, V.L. & Buchhorn, M., 1991. preprint.Google Scholar
Ostriker, J.P. & Suto, S., 1990. Ap. J., 348, 378.Google Scholar
Peebles, P.J.E., 1980. The Large Scale Structure of The Universe, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Raychaudhury, S., 1989. Nature, 342, 251.Google Scholar
Regos, E. & Szalay, A.S., 1989. Ap. J., 343, 627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rephaeli, Y. & Lahav, O., 1991. Ap. J., 372, 21.Google Scholar
Rowan, Robinson et al., 1990. M.N.R.A.S., 247, 1.Google Scholar
Sandage, A., Tammann, G.A. & Yahil, A., 1979. Ap. J., 232, 352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharf, C., Hoffman, Y., Lahav, O. & Lynden-Bell, D., 1991. preprint.Google Scholar
Schechter, P., 1980. Astr. J., 85, 801.Google Scholar
Strauss, M.A. & Davis, M., 1988. in Large Scale Motions in the Universe, eds. Coyne, G. V. & Rubin, V.C., Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Sunyaev, R.A. & Zeldovich, Ya.B., 1980. M.N.R.A.S., 190, 413.Google Scholar
Tonry, J.L., Ajhar, E.A. & Luppino, G.A., 1989. Ap. J., 346, L57.Google Scholar
Tully, R.B., 1988. Nature, 334, 209.Google Scholar
Yahil, A. 1990. in Proceedings of the Moriond conference, March 1990.Google Scholar
Willick, J.A. 1990. Ap. J., 351, L5.Google Scholar