Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T15:36:00.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pro and Contra Changes in the Conventional Values of Precession

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2016

W. Fricke
W. Fricke*
Affiliation:
Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Heidelberg, F.R.G.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

From an evalution of the arguments pro and contra changes in the precessional constants it is concluded that corrections should be made simultaneously with changes in the values of planetary masses at the time when the new fundamental reference system, the FK5, is introduced into the ephemerides. In this case the location and motion of the equinox would be corrected at the same time. An IAU decision on changes in the constants should be made in 1976. Since the completion of the FK5 may be expected around 1980, the introduction into the ephemerides appears practicable in 1984.

Type
Joint Discussions
Information
Highlights of Astronomy , Volume 3: Highlights of Astronomy. As presented at the XVth General Assembly of the IAU, 1973 , 1974 , pp. 211 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1974

References

Aoki, S.: 1967, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 19, 585.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R.d’E.: 1951, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. III, 619.Google Scholar
Atkinson, R.d’E.: 1973, Astron. J. 78, 147.Google Scholar
Böhme, S. and Fricke, W.: 1965, in Kovalevsky, J. (ed.), ‘The System of Astronomical Constants’, IAU Symp. 21 =Bull Astron. 25, 269.Google Scholar
Boss, L.: 1910, Astron. J. 26, 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clube, S.V.M.: 1972, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 159, 289.Google Scholar
Fatchikhin, N. V.: 1970, Astron. Zh. 47, 619= Soviet Astron. 14, 495.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1966, Trans. IAU XIIB, p. 604.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1967a, Astron. J. 72, 642.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1967b, Astron. J. 72, 1368.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1971a, Astron. Astrophys. 13, 298.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1971b, Celes. Mech. 4, 150.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1972, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 10, 101.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1974, in Gliese, W., Murray, C. A., and Tucker, R. H. (eds.), ‘New Problems in Astrometry’, IAU Symp. 61, 23.Google Scholar
Gliese, W.: 1974, in Gliese, W., Murray, C. A., and Tucker, R. H. (eds.), ‘New Problems in Astrometry’, IAU Symp. 61, 31.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. E.: 1952, Izv. Glav. Astron. Obs. Pulkovo 19, No. 148, 72.Google Scholar
Klepczynski, W. J., Seidelmann, P. K., and Duncombe, R. L.: 1971, Celes. Mech. 4, 253.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J. (ed.): 1965,. ‘The System of Astronomical Constants’, IAU Symp. 21, 322.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J.: 1971, Celes. Mech. 4, 213.Google Scholar
Laubscher, R. E.: 1972, Astron. Astrophys. 20, 407.Google Scholar
Morgan, H. R. and Oort, J. H.: 1951, Bull. Astron. Inst. Neth. 11, 379.Google Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1898, Astron. Papers Washington, 8, Part 1.Google Scholar
Van Flandern, T. C: 1971, Celes. Mech. 4, 182.Google Scholar
Vasilevskis, S. and Klemola, A. R.: 1971, Astron. J. 76, 508.Google Scholar
Vasilevskis, S. and McNamara, B. J.: 1973, Astron. J. 78, 639.Google Scholar
Vicente, R. O.: 1971, Celes. Mech. 4, 186.Google Scholar
Walter, H. G.: 1974, in Gliese, W., Murray, C. A., and Tucker, R. H. (eds.),’New Problems in Astrometry’, IAU Symp. 61, 131.Google Scholar