Skip to main content Accessibility help

Kierkegaard and the Limits of Thought

  • Daniel Watts (a1)


This essay offers an account of Kierkegaard’s view of the limits of thought and of what makes this view distinctive. With primary reference to Philosophical Fragments, and its putative representation of Christianity as unthinkable, I situate Kierkegaard’s engagement with the problem of the limits of thought, especially with respect to the views of Kant and Hegel. I argue that Kierkegaard builds in this regard on Hegel’s critique of Kant but that, against Hegel, he develops a radical distinction between two types of thinking and inquiry: the ‘aesthetic-intellectual’ and the ‘ethico-religious’. I clarify this distinction and show how it guides Kierkegaard’s conception of a form of philosophical practice that involves drawing limits to the proper sphere of disinterested contemplation. With reference to two rival interpretations of Kierkegaard’s approach to the limits of thought—which I call ‘bullet-biting’ and ‘relativizing’—I further show how my ‘disambiguating’ account can better explain how, and why, his work courts a form of self-referential incoherence, in which it appears that certain limits of thought are at once affirmed and violated.



Hide All
Allison, H. E. (1967), ‘Christianity and Nonsense’, Review of Metaphysics 20: 432460.
Burgess, A. (2009), ‘Henrich Steffens: Combining Danish Romanticism with Christian Orthodoxy’, in J. Stewart (ed.), Kierkegaard and his Danish Contemporaries, Tome I Farnham: Ashgate.
Conant, J. (1989), ‘Must We Show What We Cannot Say?’, in R. Fleming and M. Payne (eds.), The Senses of Stanley Cavell. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press.
Conant, J. (1993), ‘Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein and Nonsense’, in T. Cohen, P. Guyer and H. Putnam (eds.), Pursuits of Reason. Texas: Texas University Press.
Evans, C. S. (1992), Passionate Reason: Making Sense of Kierkegaard’s Philosophical Fragments. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Evans, C. S. (2008), ‘Kierkegaard and the Limits of Reason: Can There Be a Responsible Fideism?Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 64: 10211035.
Ferreira, M. J. (1994), ‘The Point Outside the World: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on Nonsense, Paradox and Religion’, Religious Studies 30: 2944.
Frege, G. ((1977) [1918]), ‘Thoughts’, in his Logical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hannay, A. (2003), ‘Climacus among the Philosophers’, in Kierkegaard and Philosophy: Selected Essays. London: Routledge.
Hopkins, R. (1998), Picture, Image and Experience: A Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (2004), Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, trans. G. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lippitt, J. and Hutto, D. (1998), ‘Making Sense of Nonsense: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98: 263286.
McDowell, J. (1998), ‘Two Sorts of Naturalism’, in his Mind, Value, and Reality. London: Harvard University Press.
Moran, R. (2001), Authority and Estrangement: An Essay on Self-Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mulhall, S. (1999), ‘God’s Plagiarist: The Philosophical Fragments of Johannes Climacus’, Philosophical Investigations 22: 134.
Mulhall, S. (2001), Inheritance and Originality: Wittgenstein, Heidegger, Kierkegaard. Oxford: Clarendon.
Priest, G. (2001), Beyond the Limits of Thought. Oxford: Clarendon.
Ross, S. (1974), ‘Caricature’, The Monist 58: 285293.
Rubenstein, M.-J. (2002), ‘Ecstatic Subjectivity: Kierkegaard’s Critiques and Appropriations of the Socratic’, Modern Theology 17: 442473.
Rudd, A. (2000), ‘On Straight and Crooked Readings: Why the Postscript Does Not Self-Destruct’, in P. Houe, G. D. Marino and S. H. Rossel (eds.), Anthropology and Authority: Essays on Søren Kierkegaard. Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi.
Schönbaumsfeld, G. (2007), A Confusion of the Spheres: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein on Philosophy and Religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vidal, D. (2005), ‘The Pathos of Limit: Reading Kierkegaard Through the Dialectic of Limit’, in N. J. Cappelørn and H. Deuser (eds.), Kierkegaard Studies Yearbook: 2005. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Watts, D. (2007), ‘The Paradox of Beginning: Hegel, Kierkegaard and Philosophical Inquiry’, Inquiry 50: 533.
Watts, D. (2010), ‘Subjective Thinking: Kierkegaard on Hegel’s Socrates’, Hegel Bulletin 61: 2344.
Watts, D. (2013), ‘Kierkegaard and the Search for Self-Knowledge’, European Journal of Philosophy 21: 525549.
Weston, M. (1999), ‘Evading the Issue: The Strategy of Kierkegaard’s Postscript ’, Philosophical Investigations 22: 3564.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed