Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:10:39.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hegel's Pragmatic Critique and Reconstruction of Kant's System of Principles in the 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2015

Kenneth R. Westphal
Kenneth R. Westphal*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Bogazici University, İstanbul westphal.k.r@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Peirce's study of Kant, and later of Hegel, and Dewey's (1930) retention of much of Hegel's social philosophy are recognised idealist sources of pragmatism. Here I argue that the transition from idealism to pragmatic realism was already achieved by Hegel. Hegel's ‘Objective Logic’ corresponds in part to Kant's ‘Transcendental Logic’ (WdL, GW 21:47.1-3). Hegel faults Kant for relegating concepts of reflection to an Appendix to his Transcendental Logic (WdL, GW 12:19.34-38), and for treating reason as ‘only dialectical’ and as ‘merely regulative’ (WdL, GW 12:23.12, .16-17). I present three important yet neglected features of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason which are key enthymemes undergirding Hegel's critical reconstruction of Kant's Critical philosophy (§2). I then summarise some features of the philosophical context within which Hegel begins to re-assess and reconstruct Kant's Transcendental Logic (§3), and review several key steps in this direction Hegel undertook in the 1807 Phenomenology (§4). (A related paper extends these results to Hegel's Logic and Encyclopaedia.) These points show that Hegel's reanalysis of Kant's Critical philosophy is the first and still one of the most sophisticated and adequate pragmatic — specifically pragmatic realist — accounts of the a priori.

Type
Articles
Information
Hegel Bulletin , Volume 36 , Special Issue 2: Pragmatism , October 2015 , pp. 159 - 183
Copyright
© The Hegel Society of Great Britain 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, L. W. (1978), Essays on Kant and Hume. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bouwsma, O. K. (1949), ‘Descartes’ Evil Genius’, The Philosophical Revivew 582: 141-151.Google Scholar
Burbidge, J. (1996), Real Process: How Logic and Chemistry Combine in Hegel's Philosophy of Nature. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, R. (1950), Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Collins, A. (2012), Hegel's Phenomenology: The Dialectical Justification of Philosophy's First Principles. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
De Gandt, F. (1995), Force and Geometry in Newton's Principia, trans. C. Wilson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
de Laurentiis, A. (2009), ‘Absolute Knowing’, in K. R. Westphal (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 246-264.Google Scholar
deVries, W. (1987), Hegel's Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca: NY, Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1930), Individualism Old and New. New York: Minton, Balch & Co.Google Scholar
Evans, G. (1975), The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Falkenburg, B. (1987), Die Form der Materie. Zur Metaphysik der Natur bei Kant und Hegel. Frankfurt am Main: Athenaeum.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (1988), ‘On the Relation Between “Mode” and “Measure” in Hegel’s Science of Logic: Some Introductory Remarks’. The Owl of Minerva 20(1): 21-49.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. 1991-92. ‘Logica e filosofia della natura nella Dottrina dell'essere hegeliana’, Parts 1, 2. el'esRivista di storia della filosofia, new series, Part 1: 46.4 (1991):701-735, Part 2: 47.1 (1992):103-124.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (1995), Guida al De orbitis planetarum di Hegel ed alle sue edizioni e traduzioni, La pars destruens, con la collaborazione di M. Nasti De Vincentis. Bern: Haupt.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (1996), Scienze empiriche e filosofie della natura nel primo idealismo tedesco. Milan: Guerini & Co.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (2002), ‘Being and Truth in Hegel’s Philosophy of Nature’. Hegel-Studien 37: 69-90.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (2007), ‘On Hegel’s Confrontation with the Sciences in “Observing Reason”: Notes for a Discussion’. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 55/56: 1-22.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (2009a), ‘The Challenge of Reason: From Certainty to Truth’, in K. R. Westphal (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. London: Blackwell, 72-91.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (2009b), ‘Reason Observing Nature’, in K. R. Westphal (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. London: Blackwell, 92-135.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (2009c), ‘From Geological to Animal Nature in Hegel’s Idea of Life’, Hegel-Studien 44: 45-93.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (2010), ‘From the Physical World to the Habitat: Biocentrism in Hegel’s Interrelation of Animal Subjectivity with its Environment’, in O. Breidbach and W. Neuser (eds.), Hegels Naturphilosophie in der Dritten Moderne. Bestimmungen, Probleme und Perspektiven. Ernst-Haeckel-Haus-Studien. Monographien zur Geschichte der Biowissenschaften und Medizin 13. Berlin: Verlag fÏr Wissenschaft und Bildung, 119-135.Google Scholar
Ferrini, C. (2011), ‘The Transition to Organics: Hegel’s Idea of Life’, in S. Houlgate and M. Baur (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Hegel. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 203-224.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1892a), ,Über Begriff und Gegenstand”, Vierteljahresschrift ffe wissenschaftliche Philosophie. Leipzig: O. R. Reisland, 16: 192-205; rpt. in: Idem., 2008: 47-60.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1892b), ,Ü,92 Sinn und Bedeutung”, Zeitschrift fÏr Philosophie und philosophische Kritik. Halle a. S.: C. E. M. Pfeffer, 100:25-50; rpt. in: Idem., 2008: 23-46.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (2008), Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung: fÏnf logische Studien, ed. G. Patzig. GÎttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Fulda, H.-F. (1975), Das Problem einer Einleitung in Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik, 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Fulda, H.-F. (2007), ,,Das absolute Wissen - sein Begriff, Erscheinen und Wirklich-werden”/≪ Le savoir absolut: son concept, son apparaîre et son devenir effectivement réel ≫, Revue de métaphysique et de morale 3.55: 338–401. (Bilingual publication.)Google Scholar
Galilei, G. (1890–1910), Le Opere di Galileo Galilei, 20 vols., ed. A. Favaro. Fierenze: Edizione Nazionale, designated ‘Opere’.Google Scholar
Galilei, G. (1974), Two New Sciences, trans. S. Drake. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Harper, W. (2011), Isaac Newton's Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence about Gravity and Cosmology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1986-), Gesammelte Werke, 21 vols. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, with the Hegel-Kommission der Rheinisch-Westfälischen Akademie der Wissenschaften and the Hegel-Archiv der Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. H. (2010), The Science of Logic, trans. G. Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Provides pagination of GW.)Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. H. (forthcoming), The Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. T. Pinkard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huggett, N., Smith, G. E., Miller, D. M.Harper, W. (2013), ‘On Newton's method’, Metascience; doi: 10.1007/s11016-013-9745-y.Google Scholar
James, W. (1975), Pragmatism: a new name for some old ways of thinking : popular lectures on philosophy with an Introduction by H. S. Thayer, ed. F. Bowers and I. Skrupskelis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; first published: London & New York: Longmans, Green, 1907.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1902-), Kants Gesammelte Schriften. KÎniglich PreuÞische (now Deutsche) Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: G. Reimer (now De Gruyter).Google Scholar
Kuhn, F. (1996), Ein anderes Bild des Pragmatismus. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Lenz, J. G. (ed.) (1804-1811), Schriften der Herzoglichen SocietÌt fÏr die gesammte Mineralogie zu Jena (Jena, GÎpferdt; vol. 1. Available at http://zs.thulb.uni-jena.de/receive/jportal_jpvolume_00104632.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. I. (1929), Mind and the World Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Charles Scribners; rev. ed.: New York: Dover, 1956.Google Scholar
Moretto, A. (2004), Filosofia della Matematica e della Meccanica del sistema Hegeliano, 2nd rev. ed. Padova: Il Poligrafo.Google Scholar
Newton, I. (1999), The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. I. B. Cohen and A. Whitman with assistance from J. Budenz. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1877), ‘The Fixation of Belief’, Popular Science Monthly 12: 1-15; rpt. in: CP 5:358-387; Writings 3:248-257.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1931-35, 1958), Collected Papers of Charles Saunders Peirce, ed. C. Hartshorn, P. Weiss and A. W. Burks. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1982–2000), Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, ed. M. Fisch, C. Kloesel and N. Hauser et al. Bloomington: Indiana University Press., 7 vols. (to date).Google Scholar
Pfleiderer, C. F. von, (1804/1994), Physik. Naturlehre nach Klügel. Nachschrift einer Tübinger Vorlesung von 1804, ed. P. Ziche. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog.Google Scholar
Rauch, (1832), Verzeichniß der von dem Professor Herrn Dr. Hegel und dem Dr. Herrn Seebeck hinterlassenen Bücher-Sammlungen. Berlin: Müller.Google Scholar
Redding, P. (2014), ‘The Role of “Logic Commonly So-Called” in Hegel's Science of Logic’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy; published online 24.03.14, doi: 10.1080/09608788.2014.891196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, P. (2015), ‘An Hegelian Solution to a Tangle of Problems Facing Brandom's Analytic Pragmatism’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (Published online: 06 Dec 2014); doi: 10.1080/09608788.2014.984284.Google Scholar
Renault, E. (2001), Hegel: la naturalisation de la dialectique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1979, rpt. 2009), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1911), ‘Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description’, Rpt. in J. Passmore, gen. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Bertrand Russell. London: Routledge, 1994, 6: 147-82.Google Scholar
Sans, G. (2004), Die Realisierung des Begriffs. Eine Untersuchung zu Hegels Schlusslehre. Berlin: Akademie Verlag (de Gruyter).Google Scholar
Schneider, H. Hg. (2010), ,,Hegels Bibliothek. Der Versteigerungskatalog von 1832”, Jahrbuch für Hegel-Forschungen 13–14: 69-145.Google Scholar
Shook, J.Good, J. (2010), John Dewey's Philosophy of Spirit, with the 1897 Lecture on Hegel. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, G. (2002), ‘From the Phenomenon of the Ellipse to an Inverse-Square Force: Why Not?’, in D. Malament (ed.), Reading Natural Philosophy: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science and Mathematics. LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, 31-70.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. (ed.) (1996), The Hegel Myths and Legends. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, B. (1994), ‘Kantian Argument, Conceptual Capacities, and Invulnerability', in P. Parrini (ed.), Kant and Contemporary Epistemology. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 231-51.Google Scholar
Surber, J. P. (2013), ‘Hegel's Linguistic Thought in the Philosophy of Subjective Spirit: Between Kant and the “Metacritics”', in D. Stern (ed.), Essays on Hegel's Philososphy of Subjective Spirit. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 181-200.Google Scholar
Tetens, J. N. (1775), Über die allgemeine speculativische Philosophie. Bützow & Wismar: Boedner.Google Scholar
Tetens, J. N. (1777), Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwicklung, 2 vols. Leipzig: M. G. Weidmanns Erben und Reich.Google Scholar
Tetens, J. N. (1913), Über die allgemeine speculativische Philosophie ö Philosophische Versuche über die menschliche Natur und ihre Entwicklung, erster Band, ed. W. Uebele. Berlin: Reuther & Reichard.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (1989), Hegel's Epistemological Realism: A Study of the Aim and Method of Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Dordrecht & Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (1996), ‘Kant, Hegel, and the Transcendental Material Conditions of Possible Experience’, Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 33: 23-41.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (1998a), Hegel, Hume und die Identität wahrnehmbarer Dinge. Historisch-kritische Analyse zum Kapitel “Wahrnehmung” in der Phänomenologie von 1807. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (1998b), ‘On Hegel's Early Critique of Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’, in S. Houlgate (ed.), Hegel and the Philosophy of Nature. Albany: SUNY Press, 137-166.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2000), ‘Hegel's Internal Critique of Naïve Realism’, Journal of Philosophical Research 25: 173-229.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2002-03), ,,Analytischer Gehalt und zeitgenössische Bedeutung von Hegels Kritik des unmittelbaren Wissens”, Jahrbuch für Hegel-Forschungen 8/9: 129-143.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2003a), Hegel's Epistemology: An Introduction to the Phenomenology of Spirit. Cambridge, Mass.: Hackett Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2004), Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2007), ‘Consciousness and its Transcendental Conditions: Kant's Anti-Cartesian Revolt’, in S. Heinämaa, V. Lähteenmäki and P. Remes (eds.), Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 223-243.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2008), ‘Philosophizing about Nature: Hegel's Philosophical Project’, in F. C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 281-310.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2009a), ‘Hegel's Phenomenological Method and Analysis of Consciousness’, in K. R. Westphal (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 1-36.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2009b), ‘Does Kant's Opus Postumum Anticipate Hegel's Absolute Idealism?’, in E.-O. Onnasch (ed.), Kants Philosophie der Natur. Ihre Entwicklung bis zum Opus postumum und Nachwirkung. Berlin: deGruyter, 357-383.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2009c), ‘Consciousness, Scepticism and the Critique of Categorial Concepts in Hegel's 1807 Phenomenology of Spirit’, in M. Bykova and M. Solopova (eds.), Сущность и Слово. Сборник научных статей к юбилею профессора Н. В. Мотрошиловой. Moscow: Phenomenology & Hermeneutics Press, 357-376. (Volume title: Essence and Word. Festschrift for Professor N. V. Motroshilova.).Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2009d), ‘Mutual Recognition & Rational Justification in Hegel's, Phenomenology of Spirit’, Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 48(4), 1-47; doi: http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1017/S0012217309990412.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2010a), ‘Hegel, Russell, and the Foundations of Philosophy’, in A. Nuzzo (ed.), Hegel and the Analytical Tradition. New York: Continuum, 174-194.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2010b), ‘Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy’, in P. Guyer (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 401-430.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2010-11), ‘Analytic Philosophy and the Long Tail of Scientia: Hegel and the Historicity of Philosophy’, The Owl of Minerva 42(1-2), 1-18.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2011), ‘Self-Consciousness, Anti-Cartesianism and Cognitive Semantics in Hegel's 1807 Phenomenology’, in S. Houlgate and M. Baur (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Hegel. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 68-90.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2014), ‘Hegel's Semantics of Singular Cognitive Reference, Newton's Methodological Rule Four & Scientific Realism Today’, Philosophical Inquiries 2(i): 7-63.Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2015a), ‘Causal Realism & the Limits of Empiricism: Some Unexpected Insights from Hegel’, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5(2).Google Scholar
Westphal, K. R. (2015b), ‘Hegel's Pragmatic Critique & Reconstruction of Kant's System of Principles in the Logic & Encyclopaedia’, Dialogue: Canadian Journal of Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie 54(2); doi: 10.1017/0012217315000219.Google Scholar
Will, F. L. (1997), Pragmatisim and Realism, ed. K. R. Westphal. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (1986), ,,Hegel und Cauchy. Eine Untersuchung zur Philosophie und Geschichte der Mathematik”, in R.-P. Horstmann (ed.), Hegel und die Naturwissenschaften. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: frommann-holzboog, 197-263.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (2009a), Abhandlungen über die Prinzipien der Logik, 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar
Wolff, M. (2009b), Der Begriff des Widerspruchs, 2nd rev. ed. Frankfurt am Main: University of Frankfurt Press.Google Scholar
Ziche, P. (1997), ,,Naturforschung in Jena zur Zeit Hegels. Materialen zum Hintergrund der spekulativen Naturphilosophie”. Hegel-Studien 32: 9-40.Google Scholar